What's new

Hersh: Turkey behind Syria sarin attack

Hasbara Buster

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 17, 2010
Messages
4,612
Reaction score
-7
Hersh: Turkey behind Syria sarin attack

357556_chemical.jpg

Last August’s attack in the Damascus suburb of Ghouta claimed hundreds of lives.

American investigative journalist Seymour Hersh says Turkey was behind last year’s sarin gas attack carried out by foreign-backed insurgents in Syria.

In a report published on Sunday in the London Review of Books, Hersh claimed Turkey staged the gas attack to provoke a US war on Syria. Turkish Prime Minister Recep Erdoğan was known to be supporting the al-Nusra Front, an insurgent group fighting the Syrian government, he said.

According to the report, more than ten members of the al-Nusra Front were arrested last May in southern Turkey with “two kilograms of sarin.” But in a news conference last summer, Turkey’s ambassador to Moscow Aydin Sezgin dismissed the arrests and told reporters that the recovered “sarin” was merely “anti-freeze,” the report said.

“We knew there were some in the Turkish government,” Hersh quoted a former senior US intelligence official, who has access to current intelligence, as saying. The American official believed “they could get [Syrian President Bashar al-]Assad’s nuts in a vice by dabbling with a sarin attack inside Syria – and forcing Obama to make good on his red line threat.”

Last August’s attack in the Damascus suburb of Ghouta claimed hundreds of lives.

At the time, the Barack Obama administration and the US mainstream media immediately blamed the Syrian government for the atrocity, with Obama ordering the Pentagon to draw up targets for bombing. America’s European and Middle Eastern allies backed Washington’s warmongering campaign.

The report showed the US military leadership knew that the White House claims were false.

The American and British intelligence also had been aware that insurgents in Syria were developing chemical weapons, according to the report.

So far, the UN-led inquiries have found no evidence on the Syrian government’s involvement in the attack.

PressTV - Hersh: Turkey behind Syria sarin attack
 
:lol: Safavids' mouthpiece propaganda.

The crazed Mullahs need to develop some kind of new strategies to bash their enemies.

The Supreme Leader should fire the douche of the Ministry of Information. So far, everything he had done turned into a dark comedy. :rofl:

Nuts.
 
:lol: Safavids' mouthpiece propaganda.

The crazed Mullahs need to develop some kind of new strategies to bash their enemies.

The Supreme Leader should fire the douche of the Ministry of Information. So far, everything he had done turned into a dark comedy. :rofl:

Nuts.
Actually it was me who was behind the attack
 
There are so many videos revealed regime using Volcano rockets. Yet that clown claims that rockets are not regime.

oh so now Hersh became a Syrian regime propagandist... you are a joke... no matter how many times WESTERN scholars and scientists from MIT and many journalists claim something you have to step up and defend Alqaeda...

Press TV: Iranian toilet outlet

Next
Hersh:Turkey’s Erdogan behind chemical attack of Syria’s Gouta

what are you going to claim next? Hersh is Iranian??

:lol: Safavids' mouthpiece propaganda.

The crazed Mullahs need to develop some kind of new strategies to bash their enemies.

The Supreme Leader should fire the douche of the Ministry of Information. So far, everything he had done turned into a dark comedy. :rofl:

Nuts.
STFU
Hersh:Turkey’s Erdogan behind chemical attack of Syria’s Gouta
 
Last edited:
oh so now Hersh became a Syrian regime propagandist... you are a joke... no matter how many times WESTERN
Hersh is well known conspiracytard. There are plenty idiots in West, who believe that moon flight was a conspiracy and so on.

scholars and scientists from MIT and many journalists claim something you have to step up and defend Alqaeda...
We already discussed that report. It is based on two false assumptions:

1) The distance from the edge of regime controlled areas to Zamalka in 5.5-6 miles.

Fact: The range from regime controlled al Maamounie to center of Zamalka is 1.5 km.

Wikimapia - Let's describe the whole world!

2) Vulcano rockets used Grad motor.

Fact: Vulcano rockets leave heavy smoke trail, while Grad does not.

MIT: Syrian Government is not responsible for Ghouta Chemical Attack
 
Hersh is well known conspiracytard. There are plenty idiots in West, who believe that moon flight was a conspiracy and so on.


We already discussed that report. It is based on two false assumptions:

1) The distance from the edge of regime controlled areas to Zamalka in 5.5-6 miles.

Fact: The range from regime controlled al Maamounie to center of Zamalka is 1.5 km.

Wikimapia - Let's describe the whole world!

2) Vulcano rockets used Grad motor.

Fact: Vulcano rockets leave heavy smoke trail, while Grad does not.

MIT: Syrian Government is not responsible for Ghouta Chemical Attack
we are not talking about the moon here, we are talking about Syria.. don't go off topic... and how dare you call Hersh idiot? just because he exposes the truth and exposes your terrorism agenda, that doesn't meant he is idiot... he was the first one to exposes American crimes in Vietnam... and since then he always said the truth... I bet if you read his anti-Syria reports you wouldn't call him idiot...

and about the MIT report, MIT know the locations better than you... they have used American government satellites and White House reports ....and it doesn't matter what rocket it was used, because F$A terrorists also have rockets, you and your friends always post stuff like that in the Syrian thread... and btw, Zamalka wasn't where the attack happened, so stop using Zamalka...
 
No surprises here.

Everyone knows Turkey is a murderous terrorist state. It's part of Turkish culture to be friends with terrorists and carry out terrorist activities.

Nobody is surprised by the terrorist acts of this truly vulgar and repulsive state.
 
Seymour Hersh Unearths More Lies on Syria

By Jonathan Cook

April 07, 2014 "ICH" - Investigative journalist Seymour Hersh has a second fascinating essay that rewrites the official record of the sarin gas attack on Ghouta, near Damascus, in August last year. As usual, Hersh uses his sources in the US security establishment to throw light on what really took place. The bottom line: Turkey was almost certainly the party responsible for the attack, hoping it would force Obama to honour his threatened “red line” if Assad used chemical weapons. Was the Assad regime to be brought down by a US military campaign, Turkey assumed it would be able to turn Syria into a client state.

Like the earlier article, this one will probably gain very little attention. It is published in the obscure UK literary publication the London Review of Books. Presumably like last time, Hersh could not find a mainstream publication willing to take it – and I’m guessing that, like last time, these stunningly important revelations will be shunned by the liberal media. Instead, it will be consigned to the memory hole, along with so much other evidence of western crimes against humanity. Pundits and analysts will continue to tell us confidently that Assad carried out the Ghouta attack, oblivious to Hersh’s findings.

The reason the New York Times, the Washington Post and the Guardian have been studiously ignoring Hersh’s investigations on this, it seems to me, is that they show the Obama administration’s foreign policy is just as criminal as the previous Bush White House’s.

Here is a summary of Hersh’s main findings:

* Obama’s sudden climbdown on his threatened military strike against Assad was in part forced on him by a chemical analysis of samples of the sarin used in Ghouta, which showed that its signature did not match that of the stockpiles held by the Assad regime.

* Despite US claims, the White House knew that the Syrian rebels had developed chemical weapons production facilities. UN investigators thought the Syrian opposition were the most likely culprits behind earlier chemical weapons attacks, in April and May 2013.

The American and British intelligence communities had been aware since the spring of 2013 that some rebel units in Syria were developing chemical weapons. On 20 June analysts for the US Defense Intelligence Agency issued a highly classified five-page ‘talking points’ briefing for the DIA’s deputy director, David Shedd, which stated that al-Nusra maintained a sarin production cell.

* The military strike being prepared by the White House after the Ghouta attack was, far from small-scale, as secretary of state John Kerry intimated, modelled on the shock and awe campaign against Saddam Hussein.

Under White House pressure, the US attack plan evolved into ‘a monster strike’: two wings of B-52 bombers were shifted to airbases close to Syria, and navy submarines and ships equipped with Tomahawk missiles were deployed. ‘Every day the target list was getting longer,’ the former intelligence official told me. … The new target list was meant to ‘completely eradicate any military capabilities Assad had’, the former intelligence official said. The core targets included electric power grids, oil and gas depots, all known logistic and weapons depots, all known command and control facilities, and all known military and intelligence buildings.

* The US developed a back channel of weapons-smuggling to the Syrian rebels, known as the rat line, in cooperation with Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar, using the “liberated” arsenals from Libya following the west’s ousting of Gaddafi.

The rat line, authorised in early 2012, was used to funnel weapons and ammunition from Libya via southern Turkey and across the Syrian border to the opposition. Many of those in Syria who ultimately received the weapons were jihadists, some of them affiliated with al-Qaida. … By the terms of the agreement, funding came from Turkey, as well as Saudi Arabia and Qatar; the CIA, with the support of MI6, was responsible for getting arms from Gaddafi’s arsenals into Syria. … The operation was run by David Petraeus, the CIA director who would soon resign when it became known he was having an affair with his biographer.

* The job of the US consulate in Libya – the one where ambassador Christopher Stevens was killed – was to provide logistical assistance with the rat line. That was the reason the consulate was attacked.

‘The consulate’s only mission was to provide cover for the moving of arms,’ the former intelligence official, who has read the annex, said. ‘It had no real political role.’ … Washington abruptly ended the CIA’s role in the transfer of arms from Libya after the attack on the consulate, but the rat line kept going. ‘The United States was no longer in control of what the Turks were relaying to the jihadists,’ the former intelligence official said. Within weeks, as many as forty portable surface-to-air missile launchers, commonly known as manpads, were in the hands of Syrian rebels. On 28 November 2012, Joby Warrick of the Washington Post reported that the previous day rebels near Aleppo had used what was almost certainly a manpad to shoot down a Syrian transport helicopter. ‘The Obama administration,’ Warrick wrote, ‘has steadfastly opposed arming Syrian opposition forces with such missiles, warning that the weapons could fall into the hands of terrorists and be used to shoot down commercial aircraft.’

* By late 2012 the US had assessed that the rebels were losing the civil war, and started to downgrade their involvement in the rat line. That left Turkey’s Recep Erdogan the main loser.

The American decision to end CIA support of the weapons shipments into Syria left Erdoğan exposed politically and militarily. ‘One of the issues at that May summit was the fact that Turkey is the only avenue to supply the rebels in Syria,’ the former intelligence official said. … Without US military support for the rebels, the former intelligence official said, ‘Erdoğan’s dream of having a client state in Syria is evaporating and he thinks we’re the reason why. When Syria wins the war, he knows the rebels are just as likely to turn on him – where else can they go? So now he will have thousands of radicals in his backyard.’

* Erdogan therefore became focused on exploiting the “red line” Obama had set on Assad’s use of chemical weapons to force the US to attack Syria.

Erdoğan knew that if he stopped his support of the jihadists it would be all over. The Saudis could not support the war because of logistics – the distances involved and the difficulty of moving weapons and supplies. Erdoğan’s hope was to instigate an event that would force the US to cross the red line. But Obama didn’t respond [to the previous chemical weapons attacks] in March and April.’ … We now know it was a covert action planned by Erdoğan’s people to push Obama over the red line,’ the former intelligence official said. ‘They had to escalate to a gas attack in or near Damascus when the UN inspectors’ – who arrived in Damascus on 18 August to investigate the earlier use of gas – ‘were there. The deal was to do something spectacular. … Barring a major change in policy by Obama, Turkey’s meddling in the Syrian civil war is likely to go on.

Jonathan Cook is an award-winning British journalist based in Nazareth, Israel, since 2001.http://www.jonathan-cook.net
Seymour Hersh Unearths More Lies on Syria
 
Back
Top Bottom