What's new

Heavy water leakage at Kakrapar atomic plant in south Gujarat, 1 plant shut, no radiation leak

I seriously doubt that India will be able to fulfil it's ambitious commitments made in Paris without it impacting growth. Let's see how it pans out. Corporate sector is not at all enthused and neither are the banks after the hit they took on Suzlon.
I'm expecting a massive Carbon credit trading for countries like China and India in future with under developed countries.
It is ironic but we will see a sad situation, where it will be in interest of developing nations that poorly developed countries remain in that state.
 
.
Sectoral growth is as follows (around 8.5% growth)
View attachment 298322 However good thing is that deficit of power is reducing constantly with improvement in Plant Load and availability factors and massive investment in National Grid.

View attachment 298323
Power Sector at a Glance ALL INDIA | Welcome To Ministry of Power

Figures are wrong. I have seen this chart and there is a lot of skulduggery done. Deficit is much much more and but is hidden or manipulated by understating the demand. This was a policy decision by Congress which seems has been continued by BJP.

Let's leave it here.

P.S. I am talking only about the deficit not the installed capacity. Installed capacity is easily verifiable and seems to be on the money.

I'm expecting a massive Carbon credit trading for countries like China and India in future with under developed countries.
It is ironic but we will see a sad situation, where it will be in interest of developing nations that poorly developed countries remain in that state.

There is a fortune to be made (or lost) when Carbon trading takes off but sadly common folks like me wont even get into the game.
 
.
skulduggery
True and i'll tell you what it is.
The report says production at facility and not what consumer gets.
Here the things get murky when you consider the fact that even though we have a good installed capacity, a lot of people and industry doesn't get power. the reason is paying capability and this is where things go wrong. a lot of people (especially rural areas) can't pay owing to high costs. secondly a lot of power bills are waived off as a political tool (election seasons it is quite common to see) and all this leads to a situation where Electricity Boards are in extremely poor financial condition as @PARIKRAMA has mentioned.
the grid is then forced to stop supply leading to several plants (Peak load ones especially) to reduce generation further leading to loss of revenue over and above unpaid amount they have accumulated. this becomes a vicious cycle where owing to a distorted market structure and relatively not a very large gap between supply and demand, a commodity remains elusive to many.
massive reforms are required in this area (Distribution more so) to improve the situation.
 
.
Ok here is some more for Solar Power Financing Challenges

Despite favourable policies and support being provided by the Central and State Governments, solar power financing faces the following major challenges:

1. Power Sector Exposure Limit: Most banks have already reached their exposure limits in power sector set by them in pursuance of the RBI guidelines. In addition, there is continual asset liability mismatch due to the long term nature of the solar power plant projects. These factors cause tightness in liquidity and borrowing costs.

2. Lack of Payment Security / SEB Health: Though the Centre has provided Gross Budgetary Support of INR 486 Cr towards payment security mechanism under Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission /JNNSM giving some comfort to the lenders, deteriorating financial health of the state utilities makes the lenders uncomfortable in financing state sponsored solar power projects. As a result lenders tend to place solar projects in high risk categories and that increases cost of borrowing.

3. Smaller Size Projects: To enhance participation by more bidders/developers, solar projects are fragmented into small capacities as compared to traditional power plants and therefore, lenders are reluctant to finance small transactions. Even if finance is available, transaction costs are higher.

4. Technology: Solar is relatively new to India. Banks/Development Finance Institutions (DFIs) are still reluctant to invest in technologies that have not been followed closely. Given the perceived technology risk, project finance in solar is yet to take off on a substantial scale.

5. Lack of On-Ground Insolation Data: Solar Radiation is a raw material for solar power and any error in solar resource estimation adds uncertainty to the future returns. On ground solar insolation data is sketchy and a database needs to be developed for different locations to give comfort to the lenders. Hence, lack of insolation data results in lenders insisting on (P90 - P95) levels for energy production and revenues.

6. High Sensitivity to Variable Interest Rates and Impact on Financial Viability: Variable interest rate impacts the cost of the project to a significant extent as all the investment is upfront and projects are debt funded.

7. Evacuation Arrangements: Evacuation of power produced is not possible in case the grid is unavailable or if the evacuation infrastructure is insufficient. Developers need to be compensated by the discom by way of a deemed generation clause in the Power Purchase Agreement. Lenders typically look for a deemed generation clause and if it
not there, then this results in a higher interest rate.

In view of the above challenges, developers of solar power projects are finding it difficult to get their projects funded.

The Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) is addressing points 3-5 with knowledge sharing of demonstrated technologies, installing monitoring stations on their own as well as through all developers of the National Solar Mission and building scale into the assignment of Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs). However points 1-2 remain a critical challenge for the banking policymakers and some suggestive steps towards addressing these challenges are described below.

A. Making Renewable Energy as an Independent Sector within the Banking / RBI guidelines
B. Increasing Liquidity through Various Measures like a Solar Energy Fund, Bonds, Securtisation etc
C. Lowering Cost of Borrowing
D. Steps to Improve Performance of State Utilities


@MilSpec @anant_s @Spectre @AUSTERLITZ @nair @Abingdonboy

even renewable energy is a big challenge for our nation
 
.
True and i'll tell you what it is.
The report says production at facility and not what consumer gets.
Here the things get murky when you consider the fact that even though we have a good installed capacity, a lot of people and industry doesn't get power. the reason is paying capability and this is where things go wrong. a lot of people (especially rural areas) can't pay owing to high costs. secondly a lot of power bills are waived off as a political tool (election seasons it is quite common to see) and all this leads to a situation where Electricity Boards are in extremely poor financial condition as @PARIKRAMA has mentioned.
the grid is then forced to stop supply leading to several plants (Peak load ones especially) to reduce generation further leading to loss of revenue over and above unpaid amount they have accumulated. this becomes a vicious cycle where owing to a distorted market structure and relatively not a very large gap between supply and demand, a commodity remains elusive to many.
massive reforms are required in this area (Distribution more so) to improve the situation.

Excellent analysis! One word - Privatisation.

Distribution (and if possible transmission) Privatisation with a flat charge of X per unit (direct subsidy transfer using Adhar to bank accounts) will solve most of the woes. @PARIKRAMA Are there some whispers in corridors regarding this or too soon for such a scheme

Ok here is some more for Solar Power Financing Challenges

Despite favourable policies and support being provided by the Central and State Governments, solar power financing faces the following major challenges:

1. Power Sector Exposure Limit: Most banks have already reached their exposure limits in power sector set by them in pursuance of the RBI guidelines. In addition, there is continual asset liability mismatch due to the long term nature of the solar power plant projects. These factors cause tightness in liquidity and borrowing costs.

2. Lack of Payment Security / SEB Health: Though the Centre has provided Gross Budgetary Support of INR 486 Cr towards payment security mechanism under Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission /JNNSM giving some comfort to the lenders, deteriorating financial health of the state utilities makes the lenders uncomfortable in financing state sponsored solar power projects. As a result lenders tend to place solar projects in high risk categories and that increases cost of borrowing.

3. Smaller Size Projects: To enhance participation by more bidders/developers, solar projects are fragmented into small capacities as compared to traditional power plants and therefore, lenders are reluctant to finance small transactions. Even if finance is available, transaction costs are higher.

4. Technology: Solar is relatively new to India. Banks/Development Finance Institutions (DFIs) are still reluctant to invest in technologies that have not been followed closely. Given the perceived technology risk, project finance in solar is yet to take off on a substantial scale.

5. Lack of On-Ground Insolation Data: Solar Radiation is a raw material for solar power and any error in solar resource estimation adds uncertainty to the future returns. On ground solar insolation data is sketchy and a database needs to be developed for different locations to give comfort to the lenders. Hence, lack of insolation data results in lenders insisting on (P90 - P95) levels for energy production and revenues.

6. High Sensitivity to Variable Interest Rates and Impact on Financial Viability: Variable interest rate impacts the cost of the project to a significant extent as all the investment is upfront and projects are debt funded.

7. Evacuation Arrangements: Evacuation of power produced is not possible in case the grid is unavailable or if the evacuation infrastructure is insufficient. Developers need to be compensated by the discom by way of a deemed generation clause in the Power Purchase Agreement. Lenders typically look for a deemed generation clause and if it
not there, then this results in a higher interest rate.

In view of the above challenges, developers of solar power projects are finding it difficult to get their projects funded.

The Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) is addressing points 3-5 with knowledge sharing of demonstrated technologies, installing monitoring stations on their own as well as through all developers of the National Solar Mission and building scale into the assignment of Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs). However points 1-2 remain a critical challenge for the banking policymakers and some suggestive steps towards addressing these challenges are described below.

A. Making Renewable Energy as an Independent Sector within the Banking / RBI guidelines
B. Increasing Liquidity through Various Measures like a Solar Energy Fund, Bonds, Securtisation etc
C. Lowering Cost of Borrowing
D. Steps to Improve Performance of State Utilities


@MilSpec @anant_s @Spectre @AUSTERLITZ @nair @Abingdonboy

even renewable energy is a big challenge for our nation

TBH it is a bad situation. Will be damned if we do and damned if we don't. I have full faith that our babus will (in the words of immortal Donald J Trump) Delay, Delay and Delay and after that obfuscate and after that manipulate. When it comes to creative obstruction no one can beat us Indians.
 
.
Well couple of days back ET carried a article on SEBs
here:Strong political will can improve Indian power sector says World Economic Forum - The Economic Times

Strong political will can improve Indian power sector says World Economic Forum
By Debjoy Sengupta, ET Bureau | Mar 10, 2016, 09.24 AM IST

KOLKATA: In a report on the Indian power sector the World Economic Forum has said that a stronger political will is needed to execute basics in the sector. These includes a robust metering & bill collection systems as well as segregation of electricity infrastructure for different industries -- industry & agriculture.

WEF, an international organization for Public-Private cooperation, has made a four pronged recommendation for improvement of the power sector, which it feels is at an inflection point, given the government's conviction that electricity is a critical enabler for economic growth.

The government recognizes the need for private investment in the power sector and is planning to adopt progressive policies on renewables and the overall sector. At this juncture alignment between federal and state government objectives is critical, as India devolves significant power to its states it said.

Recommendations include suggestions to fix viability of the power distribution system, and improve financial health of distribution companies. This, WEF feels can be achieved if policy makers develop and promote a framework conducive to public-private partnerships in electricity transmission, distribution and generation.

According to WEF regulators can help by ensuring a level playing field for private players that enter the market, and work to stem non-technical losses. Regulators can ensure transparency in governance and clear separation between policy-makers and regulators. Regulators can also ensure delivery of open access -- the ability of large commercial and industrial customers to purchase power from an open market.

India also needs to address its fuel-supply challenge, WEF has suggested. Policy-makers have an important role to play by moving upstream industries towards the free market and attracting more participation from the private sector. Initiatives such as a streamlined and viable coal-auction process, defined risk-reward frameworks to attract global majors with the right technologies and capabilities, and adopting free market-driven pricing will all help increase supply.

Indian regulators can also optimize and scale the model of Mine-Develop-Operate by accelerating the MDO award process, adopting single-window clearance through a coordinated approach across ministries.

According to the Forum a new long-term strategic model for Coal India also needs to be adopted with a better capital management and asset strategy, including potentially breaking out parts of CIL. Power infrastructure needs to be optimized with more pithead plants, which generate power from coal at the mines and UHV lines from coastal locations, WEF said.

WEF feels that India's plan to add 175 GW of capacity from renewables by 2022 can succeed only if the relevant stakeholders act in ways that encourage investment in this part of the sector.

Policy-makers should develop the blueprint for the country's renewable energy capacity by 2022 and provide policy support to foster investment in solar power. They can help attract external capital by reducing borrowing costs through strengthening the state electricity boards. They can also boost the solar industry by simplifying rules and regulations of construction of distributed solar power across many types of infrastructure. Similarly, land-acquisition regulations should be simplified to accelerate growth of wind and solar power generation.

They can enforce the mechanisms underlying renewable purchase obligations and renewable generation obligations, while also promoting open access for wind power. Critically, they should ensure long-term tariff consistency with no retroactive changes or flip-flops.

Even with huge investments in renewables, most of the power consumed in India over the next two decades will be generated by burning fossil fuel and India can do much to improve the efficiency of the existing power infrastructure. Policy-makers should develop an integrated outlook for India's energy, including targets for fuel mix, emissions and sector progress, and set a government body to monitor progress. Tariffs and rates for fuel pricing, costs that are passed through to customers, and peak power policies and pricing should all be transparent and consistent across India's states.

Businesses also play a critical role in promoting efficient new technologies, such as ultra-super critical boilers, particularly as they become more financially viable. They can also help optimize the use of the coal through coal-to-power system efficiency initiatives such as heat-rate optimization, washed coal and fire minimization. They will also be the training ground for the next generation of skilled workforce for the energy industry.



++++


Post COP21, PWC had come out with the future energy sector perspectives. This is particular to O&G segment. What is interesting is the components within each individual perspective can have a large say with other energy sources say like Coal, Nuclear or even Renewable like Solar, Wind, Hydro..


upload_2016-3-13_1-9-13.png


upload_2016-3-13_1-9-38.png


and each perspective in detail
upload_2016-3-13_1-11-8.png


upload_2016-3-13_1-11-39.png


upload_2016-3-13_1-11-55.png

upload_2016-3-13_1-12-15.png
 
.
Ahmedabad: One of the two 220 MW units of Kakrapar Atomic Power Station(KAPS) in Gujarat's Surat district was on Friday shut down after leakage of heavy water and a temporary emergency situation was declared but there was no radioactive leak and all workers are safe.
According to officials, the leakage of heavy water that is used in cooling off the nuclear reactor core was detected around 9 am and it was fixed in some time and the temporary emergency was lifted shortly afterwards.

Surat District Collector Rajendra Kumar said there was no leakage of radiation at the plant and the situation was under control.

The incident took place on a day when Japan marks the fifth anniversary of Fukushima nuclear disaster caused by a monster tsunami.

inReadcloseicon.png

Advertisement: Replay Ad
spcr.gif

Ads by ZINC
inarticle-Close-Btn.png

inReadcloseicon.png

Advertisement: Replay Ad
spcr.gif

Ads by ZINC
KAPS site director L K Jain in a statement said radiation levels in and outside the plant are normal.

"Unit-1 of KAPS, which was operating at its rated power, was shut down at about 9:00 Hrs today. Consequent to a small leak in Primary Heat Transport (PHT) system, the reactor was shut down as intended as per the design provisions. All safety systems are working as intended," the statement said.

"The radioactivity/radiation levels in the plant premises and outside are normal. KAPS 1 and 2 consists of two Units of Pressurized Heavy Water Reactors of 220 MWe each," Jain added.

The KAPS, located on the border of Surat and Tapi districts near Vyara town of Tapi, is run by Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd (NPCIL).

"The director of the plant informed me that unit-1 has been shut down following a problem in the primary heat transmission system. There was some leakage of heavy water that is used in cooling the reactor core. At present, the situation is under control," Rajendra Kumar told PTI.

According to KAPS website, the power station has two generation units of Pressurised Heavy Water Reactors (PHWR) that were commissioned during early 90s.

"The problem was detected in the morning and it has been fixed as of now. The plant also declared temporary emergency, which has been lifted after some time. As of now, there is no emergency and things are under control. We are told that Unit-1 will take some time to start functioning again," Kumar added.

Meanwhile, neighbouring Tapi district administration also swung into action and sought details from plant officials after learning about the leakage.

Tapi District Collector B C Patni also confirmed that there was no report of radiation leakage.

"The problem occurred in Unit-1 of the plant at around 9 am. As per the reports received from the site director, all the employees are working in the plant and no internal or external radiation leak took place. The leakage of liquid has been fixed," said Patni.

: The Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited`s (NPCIL) atomic power plant at Kakrapar in South Gujarat was shut down on Friday morning following a leak in its Primary Heat Transport System (PHTS), official sources said.

NPCIL`s site director Lalit Kumar Jain said Unit One of the nuclear plant was closed at 9 a.m. after a "small leak" in the PHTS.

"All safety systems (at the plant) are working as intended," Jain said in a statement.

Kakrapar Atomic Power Station (KAPS) comprises two units of pressurised heavy water reactor of 220 MWe each.

Allaying any fears, Jain said: "The radio-activity/radiation levels in the plant premises and outside are normal."


Official and police sources in Tapi district, where the plant is located, meanwhile, echoed Jain`s statement that there was no need for panic or evacuation at the plant.

Heavy water leakage at Kakrapar atomic plant in south Gujarat, 1 plant shut, no radiation leak | Zee News

Countries like India, who have an extremely bad safety record should not be generating nuclear power. Or maybe they should outsource it.

***************************************************************************************************************

The secrecy that shrouds the civilian nuclear industry in India makes it almost impossible for citizens to know accurately the details of accidents that have occurred, or indeed sometimes whether accidents have occurred at all. Yet the sector teems with rumours and eyewitness accounts of near-misses, leaks, cracks, radiation exposures and safety violations.

The costs paid by Indian citizens, in both health and environment, seem to be far greater than the meager 2.7% of electricity currently provided by India’s civilian nuclear sector (1). An even greater injustice is that it is often the same factions of society - the nameless day labourers who are not educated in the dangers of radiation - that are brought in to clear up the mess, as are then overlooked when it comes to distributing reliable supplies of electricity.

The frequency and similarity of many of these incidents and accidents is disturbing. It discredits the Department of Atomic Energy as the head of a nuclear industry, and the ability of the AERB to ensure safety in that industry.

Read about some accidents at nuclear power plants in India dating back to 1991 here.

In addition to all nuclear power facilities the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) must also ensure the safety of India’s 52,000-plus radiological facilities. These include medical institutions, industrial uses, and research facilities, and safety violations happen at them, too. The most serious incident to date is Mayapuri in 2010, in which a cobalt-60 source was sold and taken apart in a scrapyard, killing one man and hospitalising seven others.
Nuclear accidents in India | Greenpeace India

***************************************************************************************
Below is a list of leaks, fires and structural damages that have occurred in India’s civilian nuclear power sector. Numerous other examples of oil leaks, hydrogen leaks, fires and high bearing vibrations have often shut plants, and sometimes not (1).

As the Department of Atomic Energy is not obliged to reveal details of ongoings at these plants to the public, there may be many other accidents that we do not know about.

April 2011 Fire alarms blare in the control room of the Kaiga Generating Station in Karnataka. Comments by officials alternately say there was no fire, that there was only smoke and no fire, and that the fire was not in a sensitive area (2). Details from the AERB are awaited.

November 2009 Fifty-five employees consume radioactive material after tritiated water finds its way into the drinking water cooler in Kaiga Generating Station. The NPCIL attributes the incident to “an insider’s mischief” (3).

April 2003 Six tonnes leak of heavy water at reactor II of the Narora Atomic Power Station (NAPS) in Uttar Pradesh (4), indicating safety measures have not been improved from the leak at the same reactor three years previously.

January 2003 Failure of a valve in the Kalpakkam Atomic Reprocessing Plant in Tamil Nadu results in the release of high-level waste, exposing six workers to high doses of radiation (5). The leaking area of the plant had no radiation monitors or mechanisms to detect valve failure, which may have prevented the employees’ exposure. A safety committee had previously recommended that the plant be shut down. The management blames the “over enthusiasm” of the workers (6).

May 2002 Tritiated water leaks from a downgraded heavy water storage tank at the tank farm of Rajasthan Atomic Power Station (RAPS) 1&2 into a common dyke area. An estimated 22.2 Curies of radioactivity is released into the environment (7).

November 2001 A leak of 1.4 tonnes of heavy water at the NAPS I reactor, resulting in one worker receiving an internal radiation dose of 18.49 mSv (8).

April 2000 Leak of about seven tonnes of heavy water from the moderator system at NAPS Unit II. Various workers involved in the clean-up received ‘significant uptakes of tritium’, although only one had a radiation dose over the recommended annual limit (9).

March 1999 Somewhere between four and fourteen tonnes (10) of heavy water leaks from the pipes at Madras Atomic Power Station (MAPS) at Kalpakkam, Tamil Nadu, during a test process. The pipes have a history of cracks and vibration problems (11) . Forty-two people are reportedly involved in mopping up the radioactive liquid (12).

May 1994 The inner surface of the containment dome of Unit I of Kaiga Generating Station collapses (delaminates) while the plant is under construction. Approximately 130 tonnes of concrete fall from a height of nearly thirty metres (13), injuring fourteen workers. The dome had already been completed (14), forming the part of the reactor designed to prevent escape of radioactive material into the environment in the case of an accident. Fortunately, the core had not then been loaded.

February 1994 Helium gas and heavy water leak in Unit 1 of RAPS. The plant is shut down until March 1997 (15).

March 1993 Two blades of the turbine in NAPS Unit I break off, slicing through other blades and indirectly causing a raging fire, which catches onto leaked oil and spreads through the turbine building. The smoke sensors fail to detect the fire, which is only noticed once workers see the flames. It causes a blackout in the plant, including the shutdown of the secondary cooling systems, and power is not restored for seventeen hours. In the meantime, operators have to manually activate the primary shutdown system. They also climb onto the roof to open valves to slow the reactions in the core by hand (16). The incident was rated as a Level 3 on the International Nuclear Event Scale, INES.

May 1992 Tube leak causes a radioactive release of 12 Curies of radioactivity from Tarapur Atomic Power Station (17).

January 1992 Four tons of heavy water spilt at RAPS (17).

December 1991 A leak from pipelines in the vicinity of CIRUS and Dhruva research reactors at the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) in Trombay, Maharashtra, results in severe Cs-137 soil contamination of thousands of times the acceptable limit. Local vegetation was also found to be contaminated, though contract workers digging to the leaking pipeline were reportedly not tested for radiation exposure, despite the evidence of their high dose (18).

July 1991 A contracted labourer mistakenly paints the walls of RAPS with heavy water before applying a coat of whitewash. He also washed his paintbrush, face and hands in the deuterated and tritiated water, and has not been traced since (19).

March 1991 Heavy water leak at MAPS takes four days to clean up (20).

Nuclear accidents in India | Greenpeace India

@MaarKhoor @Paksanity @The Eagle @Zibago @Ammara Chaudhry
@Gufi @Bratva @araz
 
Last edited:
.
Countries like India, who have an extremely bad safety record should not be generating nuclear power. Or they maybe they should outsource it.
***************************************************************************************************************

The secrecy that shrouds the civilian nuclear industry in India makes it almost impossible for citizens to know accurately the details of accidents that have occurred, or indeed sometimes whether accidents have occurred at all. Yet the sector teems with rumours and eyewitness accounts of near-misses, leaks, cracks, radiation exposures and safety violations.

The costs paid by Indian citizens, in both health and environment, seem to be far greater than the meager 2.7% of electricity currently provided by India’s civilian nuclear sector (1). An even greater injustice is that it is often the same factions of society - the nameless day labourers who are not educated in the dangers of radiation - that are brought in to clear up the mess, as are then overlooked when it comes to distributing reliable supplies of electricity.

The frequency and similarity of many of these incidents and accidents is disturbing. It discredits the Department of Atomic Energy as the head of a nuclear industry, and the ability of the AERB to ensure safety in that industry.

Read about some accidents at nuclear power plants in India dating back to 1991 here.

In addition to all nuclear power facilities the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) must also ensure the safety of India’s 52,000-plus radiological facilities. These include medical institutions, industrial uses, and research facilities, and safety violations happen at them, too. The most serious incident to date is Mayapuri in 2010, in which a cobalt-60 source was sold and taken apart in a scrapyard, killing one man and hospitalising seven others.
Nuclear accidents in India | Greenpeace India

***************************************************************************************
Below is a list of leaks, fires and structural damages that have occurred in India’s civilian nuclear power sector. Numerous other examples of oil leaks, hydrogen leaks, fires and high bearing vibrations have often shut plants, and sometimes not (1).

As the Department of Atomic Energy is not obliged to reveal details of ongoings at these plants to the public, there may be many other accidents that we do not know about.

April 2011 Fire alarms blare in the control room of the Kaiga Generating Station in Karnataka. Comments by officials alternately say there was no fire, that there was only smoke and no fire, and that the fire was not in a sensitive area (2). Details from the AERB are awaited.

November 2009 Fifty-five employees consume radioactive material after tritiated water finds its way into the drinking water cooler in Kaiga Generating Station. The NPCIL attributes the incident to “an insider’s mischief” (3).

April 2003 Six tonnes leak of heavy water at reactor II of the Narora Atomic Power Station (NAPS) in Uttar Pradesh (4), indicating safety measures have not been improved from the leak at the same reactor three years previously.

January 2003 Failure of a valve in the Kalpakkam Atomic Reprocessing Plant in Tamil Nadu results in the release of high-level waste, exposing six workers to high doses of radiation (5). The leaking area of the plant had no radiation monitors or mechanisms to detect valve failure, which may have prevented the employees’ exposure. A safety committee had previously recommended that the plant be shut down. The management blames the “over enthusiasm” of the workers (6).

May 2002 Tritiated water leaks from a downgraded heavy water storage tank at the tank farm of Rajasthan Atomic Power Station (RAPS) 1&2 into a common dyke area. An estimated 22.2 Curies of radioactivity is released into the environment (7).

November 2001 A leak of 1.4 tonnes of heavy water at the NAPS I reactor, resulting in one worker receiving an internal radiation dose of 18.49 mSv (8).

April 2000 Leak of about seven tonnes of heavy water from the moderator system at NAPS Unit II. Various workers involved in the clean-up received ‘significant uptakes of tritium’, although only one had a radiation dose over the recommended annual limit (9).

March 1999 Somewhere between four and fourteen tonnes (10) of heavy water leaks from the pipes at Madras Atomic Power Station (MAPS) at Kalpakkam, Tamil Nadu, during a test process. The pipes have a history of cracks and vibration problems (11) . Forty-two people are reportedly involved in mopping up the radioactive liquid (12).

May 1994 The inner surface of the containment dome of Unit I of Kaiga Generating Station collapses (delaminates) while the plant is under construction. Approximately 130 tonnes of concrete fall from a height of nearly thirty metres (13), injuring fourteen workers. The dome had already been completed (14), forming the part of the reactor designed to prevent escape of radioactive material into the environment in the case of an accident. Fortunately, the core had not then been loaded.

February 1994 Helium gas and heavy water leak in Unit 1 of RAPS. The plant is shut down until March 1997 (15).

March 1993 Two blades of the turbine in NAPS Unit I break off, slicing through other blades and indirectly causing a raging fire, which catches onto leaked oil and spreads through the turbine building. The smoke sensors fail to detect the fire, which is only noticed once workers see the flames. It causes a blackout in the plant, including the shutdown of the secondary cooling systems, and power is not restored for seventeen hours. In the meantime, operators have to manually activate the primary shutdown system. They also climb onto the roof to open valves to slow the reactions in the core by hand (16). The incident was rated as a Level 3 on the International Nuclear Event Scale, INES.

May 1992 Tube leak causes a radioactive release of 12 Curies of radioactivity from Tarapur Atomic Power Station (17).

January 1992 Four tons of heavy water spilt at RAPS (17).

December 1991 A leak from pipelines in the vicinity of CIRUS and Dhruva research reactors at the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) in Trombay, Maharashtra, results in severe Cs-137 soil contamination of thousands of times the acceptable limit. Local vegetation was also found to be contaminated, though contract workers digging to the leaking pipeline were reportedly not tested for radiation exposure, despite the evidence of their high dose (18).

July 1991 A contracted labourer mistakenly paints the walls of RAPS with heavy water before applying a coat of whitewash. He also washed his paintbrush, face and hands in the deuterated and tritiated water, and has not been traced since (19).

March 1991 Heavy water leak at MAPS takes four days to clean up (20).

Nuclear accidents in India | Greenpeace India

@MaarKhoor @Paksanity @The Eagle @Zibago @Ammara Chaudhry
@Gufi @Bratva @araz
Source.......Greenpeace, enough said.


This is a nation that is so unsafe and incompetent that the US agreed to sign a civil nuclear deal with? Grow up.
 
. .
Source.......Greenpeace, enough said.


This is a nation that is so unsafe and incompetent that the US agreed to sign a civil nuclear deal with? Grow up.

Well is Greenpeace lying? Did the incidents mentioned NOT happen?

Go hide your insecurities and inferiority complex some where else, and stop talking BS.

Not to forget an NSG waiver :cool:

nuclear pariahs can cry all they want.

Dumb logic at work. Nothing new!
 
.
Source.......Greenpeace, enough said.

I agree. The sad thing is, so much of the world believes sources like Greenpeace. The irony is, even with the accidents, even with bad oversight, like the Soviets at Chernobyl, even if you take every country's nuclear power safety record and combined all of them, nuclear energy is by far, still the safest, most environmentally friendly form of energy production that exist, and it has been since it's development.
 
.
I agree. The sad thing is, so much of the world believes sources like Greenpeace. The irony is, even with the accidents, even with bad oversight, like the Soviets at Chernobyl, even if you take every countries nuclear power record and combined all of them, nuclear energy is by far, still the safest, most environmentally friendly form of energy production that exist, and it has been since it's development.
:eek: No I am afraid not. Solar is the safest, most environmentally friendly form of energy production. It may not be cheap or particularly efficient but nothing beats the good old Sun when it comes to clean energy.

Technology will get there when it will even become cheap and efficient leading to formation of micro-grids through which communities can sustain itself. The only thing which can put a damper on this coal and oil lobby which even now are bottle necking technology transmission through cheap tricks so that their respective industries and huge labor force are able to sustain themselves. But we will get there....

I am not worried about energy crisis - it is the water crisis which scares the shit out of me that is unless some breakthrough is had in de-salination i
 
.
No I am afraid not. Solar is the safest, most environmentally friendly form of energy production. It may not be cheap or particularly efficient but nothing beats the good old Sun when it comes to clean energy.

I have nothing against solar energy and I am not one who thinks that there is just one right answer, but solar energy is, as you admit, not efficient and is not about to power a modern society or economy.
 
.
Well is Greenpeace lying?
5 reasons why there is something wrong with the protests in Kudankulam


Generally the Prime Minister open his mouth rarely and speaks even less. And whenever he or for that matter, any of his ministers speak, this is how most of us react



And our reactions were more or less similar, when our Prime Minister went back to the 1980’s vintage, ‘Foreign Hand’ theory when he railed against the Kudankulam protest.

This time however, for a change, he made sense.

The story actually begins in 1974. The year in which Indira Gandhi decided, that India needed some nuke bombs.




Let us say the US was as benevolent towards India after that nuclear test, as US today is towards Iran.

In line with the US policy of benevolence, India was slapped with a trade embargo, which among other things, prevented us from getting something called, Uranium. And without the Uranium, the entire nuclear infrastructure in the country at that time, went into panic mode. The reactors were scaled down and the power generation was cut, because we did not have sufficient fuel.

Because India refused to sign the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty, no Uranium rich, decadent western country, was willing to sell Uranium to us. According to them, If India ever gets Uranium, she will peddle it to the first crackpot dictator who wants to build a bomb.




India was effectively placed in a quarantine, and denied access to anything that was remotely related to ‘Nuclear’

The status-quo continued till 2008, when George W Bush arrived in India.

Amidst all the despicable things George.H.W.Bush has inflicted on this world, he has to get credit for one thing.

He was the only guy who got Manmohan Singh to talk. In fact ‘Dubya’ Bush is singularly responsible for Manmohan, speaking up for something, that does not have the word ‘Gandhi’ in it.




If you are wondering If I am making that up, here is a clue, do the words INDO-US NUCLEAR DEAL mean anything to you?

Well, for Manmohan Singh, it meant a lot. Hell, it meant so much that, MMS flipped the normal protocol of ‘Madam Tell, Me Follow’, upside down. And he allowed a India, a brief glimpse of a part of his anatomy, that is called the spine. For the first and the last time as a P.M, he opposed a major coalition partner, stood his ground and got something done.

MMS single-handedly ended, for good, India’s three decade long nuclear isolation.

But, there are no free lunches in the capitalist world.

When the US guys told us they will take care of that NPT thingy and get us all the Uranium we need, as a quid pro pro, they demanded a major slice in the Indian nuclear power pizza. In fact they wanted the whole pizza. You see, the whole point of this generous nuclear deal, was to ensure the US derives the maximum economic benefit out of our inevitable nuclear boom.

And a major hurdle in the quest for that pizza.




You see, the reactors used to generate electricity in Kudankulam, the aforementioned VVER-1000 reactors, are a direct competitor to General Electric’s Advanced Boiling Water Reactor. And if the VVER-1000 is successful, India might opt for more of these reactors to satiate her power demands, which are projected to go North.

And if that happens, the US would become the guy, who did everything possible to impress a girl, only to see a direct competitor walking away with the credit and the girl on the first date.

Just think about it, the other Nuclear project announced after the deal was signed, was Jaitapur. And it was a French one. And guess what is happening there,



In short, USA has every reason, to pray for the failure of Kudankulam. Because, if it is successful, they have the most to lose.

After the PM’s accusation in that Science Magazine interview, the Home Ministry, moved quickly to freeze the accounts of four NGO’s, Tuticorin Diocese Association (TDA), Tuticorin Multipurpose Social Service Society (TMSSS), People’s Education for Action and Liberation and Good Vision trust.

According to the Ministry of Home Affairs, they were misdirecting the funds meant for social work, to fund a political protest. Which is explicitly stated as wrong,



The ministry of home affairs, has an amazing web-page. They list all the transactions made by the NGO’s who receive more than one crore a year.

Here is the 2010-2011 account statement of the Tuticorin Multipurpose Social Service Society (TMSSS).



If you notice, the maximum money, has been spent, in activities, mysteriously classified as ‘Others’. No explanation has been given on what those activites constitute. Now, this particluar NGO has received more than Rs 42 crores in foreign donations, over the last five years.

But, they don’t even have a website of their own. A website where they can publish detailed accounts of what they are doing with all the money. Introduce some modicum of transparency. Now, why is that?

Similiarly, the other NGO, the Tuticorin Diocese Association, received 22 crores in the same period. And they too, do not have a website, or a statement.

So, this mysterious money trail leads to a dead end. But that is not the only problem. On 6th of February, the Home ministry stated, that these very NGO’s received 54 crores from sources abroad.

Now, with a very minimum knowledge of economics, I think Rs 54 crores is quite a lot of money. And, according to the Home Ministry, they do not have the accounts to show for it. And no person from these two NGO’s has come out and given a convincing reply to the Home Ministry’s accusation.

In fact two NGO’s in question, are headed by the same guy, one Bishop Yvon Ambroise. And, since the day the report was published in the Hindu, this person has gone underground. I mean, if you are so honest about your financials, why this mysterious silence?

Similiarly, the home ministry also alleges that, DR Udayakumar, received Rs 1.5 crores of cash, in his account,to fund this agitation. In typical, Udayakumar style, he countered it aggressively, even invoking capital punishment in his defence. And, his NGO, the People’s Movement Against Nuclear Energy (PMANE) released its own account statement, to prove its innocence. This what they said

  • Total fund collection: Rs 25, 17,991. Collected Rs 200 from every household in Idinthakarai with additional help coming from Fishermen, beedi workers etc etc, who contributed 10 percent of their earnings.
  • Total expenditure: Rs 17,64,233. Spent on hiring transport, diesel genset, marquees, and supply of water to the people who congregate at the protest fast venue.
As usual, no specifics have been given. Also, they do not have a website where they can publish a detailed report. And, our media as is the norm, didn’t bother to verify this statement.

Turns out, the village of Idinthakarai has a total population of 3996. Assuming 3 members per household, total households in that village: 1332.

Going by Udayakumar’s assertion and assuming every household contributed, the total amount collected comes to: Rs 2, 66, 400.

Where did you get the rest of the money, i.e Rs 22, 51 ,591, from Dr Udaya Kumar? Are you telling us that the fishermen and beedi workers from Kudankulam contributed this amount??

Or is the Prime Minister right, when he says, Foreign money is at play?

Paying protestors to campaign against a venture by your competitor, is an old tactic in India. Every industrialist, worth his or her salt, has done it at some point of time in his/her life.

5 reasons why there is something wrong with the protests in Kudankulam Part:2 | The Kaipullai's Vetti Thoughts : The outer playground of my inner devil


@PARIKRAMA @MilSpec @Spectre @nair @Desertfalcon @Koovie @Echo_419 @anant_s @Skull and Bones
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom