What's new

Headley: ISI had no links to 26/11

Matey.. i understand both cases, you don't need to go into detail, we were discussing Rana's case and then suddenly Kassab's name popped in, along with Pasha and Hafiz Saeed in another post..

As far as Civil court is concerned, that case is purely going to be kicked out, the base is totally wrong, those people were in INDIA and it was Indian responsibility to provide security for them and protect them.. so if Israel wants to sue for its dead citizen, it should sue India, not Pakistan..

Hope i cleared you misconception..

You seem to be living in your own lil lego land it seems.....

Obviously the Israelis feel wronged by ISI....thats why the civil lawsuit against it....Its success or failure is a whole another story....But it is definitely on the records is what can be mentioned...

As far as suing India goes....LOL!!! So by your logic, the 30K off Pakistani families that have lost dear ones in deaths should not lose hope and sue the Pak govt. ASAP.....being that you were responsible for their security...
Also, maybe Daniel Pearls wife should take a hint from your proclaimation as well....
 
this is funny ....just because the guy did not have direct contact with the head of ISI does not mean that the ISI was not involved as so many Pakistan members claim....the report clearly states that ISI agents were involved.....

this is like saying the US president and generals are not responsible for the drone strikes, some random US soilder is controling the drone so he alone is responsible....if this is the logic you guys have ...please dont blame or show demonstrations against the US after every drone strike...rather just blame one guy

Kindly make sense.. two different scenarios.. Totally different :P

That just proves that you are out of any credible thing to say :lol:
 
No mate.. he said Major Iqbal is involved.. he is not sure about ISI.. it is what Iqbal 'told' him

Quote
"Headley, who has pleaded guilty to 12 terror charges arising out of the attacks on India’s financial capital, said during the Chicago trial of his childhood friend, Tahawwur Hussain Rana, that no more than a handful of ISI agents were involved in the plot"
 
Till now headly was rubbished by pakistan and now suddenly his statements have been looked at very closely ....:what:

Honestly we still dont believe this headly, as whatever he says is not credible on account of his past history and reputation.

It is for those who were continuosly asking us to watch the chicago trial closely.
 
Nothing has changed.....and this lame piece of news does NOT change anything either....

.

i have deleted the fiction part from your baseless allegations.

if his is lame piece of news then all those stupidly written bharati propaganda news are no more than just piece of BS.'


now its laughable that you bharatis are ready to forget about Headely and saying hey he was not subject to trial now its only rana :P
'
 
You are incorrect here.. If a Pakistani driver driving a German car on Indian roads intentionally overruns an American, the American or his next of kin will sue the Pakistani driver and not India for the roads or German company for making the car.

Anyway the case has not been thrown out. The case has moved forward. Summons have been issued to head of ISI and Hafeez Saeed. Pakistani govt is already preparing a defense of ISI chief. Hafiz Saeed is also demanding a similar defense by Pak govt (imagine Pak govt defending a UN declared terrorist). Plantiffs may or may not get what they are asking for, but the case is certainly not getting thrown out..

again, as usual, the example you gave was irrelevant, a Pakistani driver driving a German is 'responsible' for that German until he is sitting in his car..

Understand the difference matey..

As far as case is concerned, Hafiz Saeed can just deny the summons, and refuse to go, US Court has NO Jurisdiction in Pakistan as the Crime was NOT committed on US soil.. So not my words.. NOTHING is going to happen as per the court is concerned.. it is just another plan to defame Pakistan.. nothing else..
 
Agree, but ISI as an organization has NOT been excluded yet.. There is no court ruling yet. The papers are simply reporting what Headley said in response to a question.
Headley's testimony was the 'prime evidence' so far.

Without it there is nothing to support ISI involvement, not even rogue agent invovlement.

In fact, even the allegation of 'rogue agents' needs to be established through verifying the identities of the 'ISI agents' allegedly invovled', or at least verifying that they were indeed 'ISI agents'.

Lots of egg on the faces of the Indian media and others (Western news organizations and analysts included) that were trumpeting the so called 'Headley Confessions' to Indian investigators.
 
Attacks being plotted in a soil of a country doesn’t involves THAT country.. now does it??.. Terror Attacks of 9/11 were “plotted” and “executed” from inside USA, so why is USA waging WoT whole over the globe??

Because when you want to exterminate a rat infestation, you dont target the one solitary rat found in a remote corner of the house.....You target their breeding ground where they are concentrated....

Now replace rats with terrorists and add up the rest....
 
You seem to be living in your own lil lego land it seems.....

Obviously the Israelis feel wronged by ISI....thats why the civil lawsuit against it....Its success or failure is a whole another story....But it is definitely on the records is what can be mentioned...

As far as suing India goes....LOL!!! So by your logic, the 30K off Pakistani families that have lost dear ones in deaths should not lose hope and sue the Pak govt. ASAP.....being that you were responsible for their security...
Also, maybe Daniel Pearls wife should take a hint from your proclaimation as well....

Please read post # 67
 
His being Pakistani is questionable cuz no one in his “alleged” home town knows him..you can find the video on YouTube where a newspaper did Investigative report on Ajmal Kasab.. but.. I’ll give this to you.. so Ajmal Kasab was (probably) Pakistani and has been held in India, prosecute him and hang him till death..

2. Mumbai attacks were carried out from Pakistan.



Attacks being plotted in a soil of a country doesn’t involves THAT country.. now does it??.. Terror Attacks of 9/11 were “plotted” and “executed” from inside USA, so why is USA waging WoT whole over the globe??



An Extract from the article:




Deccan Herald??? Is this a credible source????? :P

That is why I wrote in my previous posts that there is tremendous disconnect between Pakistani govt's stand and Pakistani people's views..while govt accepts one thing but Pakistani populace choose to delve in conspiracies because it is much less painful for them keep believing such and remain in denial.
 
Quote
"Headley, who has pleaded guilty to 12 terror charges arising out of the attacks on India’s financial capital, said during the Chicago trial of his childhood friend, Tahawwur Hussain Rana, that no more than a handful of ISI agents were involved in the plot"

:P You know what the court is gonna ask?? Did you saw their IDs?? :lol:

I don't know about you, but i would always ask for ID to confirm the identity of a person.. but hay.. Headley has a history of offences right?
 
this is funny ....just because the guy did not have direct contact with the head of ISI does not mean that the ISI was not involved as so many Pakistan members claim...

Mukti bahini terrorists were directly in contact with Indira Gandhi so are you ready to accept she was a terrorist head?

btw we are not claiming its what your once beloved David Headly is saying
 
Because when you want to exterminate a rat infestation, you dont target the one solitary rat found in a remote corner of the house.....You target their breeding ground where they are concentrated....

Now replace rats with terrorists and add up the rest....

According to your logic.. to finish BLA terrorism.. shall we bomb India then??
 
Pakistanis have a habit of relying upon confessions when it suits them to ignore evidence.
What evidence is being ignored?
Can you provide evidence implicating ther ISI as an institution or implicating the ISI leadership?

Pakistanis are not the ones 'ignoring the facts and evidence here' :D

The 'prime witness' says so. :D
There is no verdict so the thread title should probably be changed to suit the story quoted by the OP.

Prime witness screwed you Pakistani haters, what else is left for the court to issue a 'verdict' on, implicating the ISI as an institution and/or its leadership?
 
Back
Top Bottom