Hatf IX Nasr Missile Tested by Pakistan

[Rig Vedic]

Sir! these Indians/politicians/generals are buying ABM systems not just to defend their countries but for only kickbacks , using the tax money to fillup their pockets. Its the greed game ........

No kickbacks on domestic production.

 

[yyetttt]

It's gonna be used on border with India... If time of war comes.. Whatever military camps india has will be destroyed by tactical nukes.

 

[Major Shaitan Singh]

Pakistan will test fire a new nuclear-capable missile by the end of this month, a media report said on Saturday.Geo News reported that the surface-to-surface `Nasr’ missile has a 180-km range and a high degree of accuracy. The army has completed preparations for it, said sources.

Pakistan April 25 successfully test-fired an intermediate range nuclear-capable missile, less than a week after India tested a 5,000-km range missile.The missile was capable of carrying nuclear and conventional warheads.

In March, Pakistan test-fired a nuclear-capable short-range surface-to-surface ballistic missile. The Hatf-2 missile can travel up to 180 km and deliver nuclear as well as conventional warheads with high accuracy.

Pakistan’s missile repertory includes Hatf ballistic missiles and its variants, Ghaznavi short-range ballistic missile, Ghauri and Shaheen medium and intermediate range ballistic missiles, Babur cruise missiles and Baktar-Shikan anti-tank guided missile, most of which have been developed with China’s help.

 

[lightoftruth]

thread exist

 

[Last Hope]

False News.
NASR will still have a range of 60km, it was designed to be a short range BRBM.

Technically too, one cannot just "Triple" the range, without massive changes in the design.

Seems like you have no idea what you are talking about.
Nasr was not designed to be a battle range missile.
And you still can increase the range with same design, using a more efficient motor, a stronger fuel (solid) and a faster boast with same consumption of fuel.

 

[The Deterrent]

Seems like you have no idea what you are talking about.
Nasr was not designed to be a battle range missile.
And you still can increase the range with same design, using a more efficient motor, a stronger fuel (solid) and a faster boast with same consumption of fuel.

Then what was it designed to be? Enlighten me please...

Yes you can, but not that much as stated. I guess we should wait for 2-3 days for the verification then...

 

[mosu]

well thats good news for pakistan

 

[Ajaxpaul]

I hope this missile will carry only conventional weapons.

Nuking India 180 kms into Indian territory will invite Retaliatory strikes which Pak cant afford.

 

[Windjammer]

I hope this missile will carry only conventional weapons.

Nuking India 180 kms into Indian territory will invite Retaliatory strikes which Pak cant afford.

Albeit, the missile will be equipped with both conventional and non conventional war heads, but......are you implying that India CAN afford a nuclear attack. !!

 

[Jungibaaz]

I hope this missile will carry only conventional weapons.

Nuking India 180 kms into Indian territory will invite Retaliatory strikes which Pak cant afford.

NASR is to be used on the battlefield.
If we wanted to take it to the level you are suggesting why not just deploy cruise missiles and larger ballistic missiles?

 

[Ajaxpaul]

NASR is to be used on the battlefield.
If we wanted to take it to the level you are suggesting why not just deploy cruise missiles and larger ballistic missiles?

I was just thinking what would be the implications of a 180 km nuke strike? Will it stop war ? No. Will it cause so massive casuallity that will decide the fate of war ? No.

 

[laiqs@mi]

I was just thinking what would be the implications of a 180 km nuke strike? Will it stop war ? No. Will it cause so massive casuallity that will decide the fate of war ? No.

one thing is for sure .........
the command and control system the scientists and the are not CH**tia. when they were going and announcing that it can carry Nuks then they have some plans behind it.

 

[Jungibaaz]

I was just thinking what would be the implications of a 180 km nuke strike? Will it stop war ? No. Will it cause so massive casuallity that will decide the fate of war ? No.

you aren't getting the point of NASR.
NASR wont be carrying some massive nuke, only a small tactical nuke if that, hell it doesn't have to be nuclear either can be conventional. It is to be used on the battlefield, why would we want to use a massive nuke on our own land, NASR is to stop invading forces in their tracks not to target cities or civilians.

And as for the consequences, you can expect no less of a response from Pakistan with the use of Prahaar.
These aren't some large ICBM's with megaton nukes, small nukes or none at all and short-range.

 

[Windjammer]

I was just thinking what would be the implications of a 180 km nuke strike? Will it stop war ? No. Will it cause so massive casuallity that will decide the fate of war ? No.

Primarily, it's designed to neutralise any armour thrust towards Pakistan.....if your soverienty is threatened, the fate of the war will be last thing on your mind. !!

 

[lightoftruth]

I was just thinking what would be the implications of a 180 km nuke strike? Will it stop war ? No. Will it cause so massive casuallity that will decide the fate of war ? No.

cmonnneee can't make them understand .