Hatf IX Nasr Missile Tested by Pakistan

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

scuds fall off the sky and their success rate is abyssimal...
Patriots may or may not have hit them...they may have fell down on their own...
plus scuds were medeival missiles comlred to modern day missiles.

I think you"ve confused PAC-1 performance in 1991 with PAC-2's performance in 2003

 

[graphican]

~~Help from ALLAH and success is near~~ translation of Arabic Ayat

إِذَا جَاءَ نَصْرُ اللَّهِ وَالْفَتْحُ
When comes the Help of Allah, and the Victory,

Nasr Means Help. Alfateh means victory.

 

[lightoftruth]

Really ? So you have modified your doctrine to include " an Indian citizen " too ? Interesting !

The thing to keep in mind is that the other party possesses you-know-what too ... Whilst the use of tactical nukes on Indian invading IBG's that too on Pakistani soil is one thing , using it as a prelude to launch a full-blown strike on Pakistan will result in Mutually Assured Destruction ... So ask yourself , Are you ready to lose a billion people for a couple of IBG's ? Your understanding of the nuclear doctrine itself is flawed , Nuclear weapons are used as a last resort ...

if u dont know about Indian nuclear doctrine why bother replying?

its simply logical that by using this on ibg ur gono loose ur first major strike advantage.

 

[HZR2011]

It is understandable.. Pakistan's army is trying very hard to match india conventionally. Only way for them to get close to that is to perfect the use of tactical nuclear warheads in battlefield.

Already 2 indian Synthetic aperture radar satellites are orbiting in Space...

 

[Splurgenxs]

THis falls under the category of rocket artillery?

conventional Rocket artillery have range more than this.

 

[Windjammer]

if u dont know about Indian nuclear doctrine why bother replying?

its simply logical that by using this on ibg ur gono loose ur first major strike advantage.

The neutralising of any Indian misadventure on Pakistani soil doesn't necessarily involves a nuclear strike. They intruding party may well find it'self under a rain of cluster munitions, however when push comes to shove then all options may be exercised.

 

[Jango]

إِذَا جَاءَ نَصْرُ اللَّهِ وَالْفَتْحُ
When comes the Help of Allah, and the Victory,

Nasr Means Help. Alfateh means victory.

Actually, Al-Nasr, as in the Surha's name means victory, but in the ayat that you mentioned, it means help.

 

[Windjammer]

THis falls under the category of rocket artillery?

conventional Rocket artillery have range more than this.

The Hatf IX, named Nasr (Arabic: نصر&#8206 , is a solid fuelled battlefield range ballistic missile (BRBM) system developed by Pakistan. The missile's existence was first reported after a test-firing on 19 April 2011.[1][2] It is referred to by Pakistan's Inter Services Public Relations organization as a "Multi Tube Ballistic Missile" because the launch vehicle carries multiple missiles.
The name "Nasr" is an Arabic word meaning "Victory".

 

[Hack-Hook]

its a little annoying when these journalists emphasis on this missile being nuclear capable ,as a matter of fact every single missile that Pakistan or any other country have is a nuclear capable missile and this is the proof of it
Nuclear artillery - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

when they emphasis on its nuclear capable they have some agenda more than reporting the news , here it was better to report how much more precise this missile is compared to the older generation of the missiles , how much it need less maintenance and how faster they could fire it when the need for that arise.

as a matter of fact as they are making it more precise its a clear sign that they have another plan for it instead putting a nuclear device inside it.

 

[Desert Fox]

I think you"ve confused PAC-1 performance in 1991 with PAC-2's performance in 2003

Regardless of what version of the PAC the Americans were using during GW1 and GW2, the facts remains and the main point is that the Iraqis were firing outdated Scuds which are pretty much outdated for even the year of 2003, and Pakistani missiles are no Scud's, though a few might have their origins from Scud variants but they are not Scuds since our scientists and engineers have heavily modified them, increased their range, and upgraded their internal/guidance systems. NASR BRBM however is in no way a Scud and does not originate from the former, therefore what the PAC-1 or PAC-2 scored against a few outdated Iraqi Scuds does not mean it can score the same against maneuverable, fast, and short rage BRBM's like the NASR which is specially meant to dodge ABM systems, same applies to other Pakistan BM's as well.

Its actually amusing and sad at the same time that you indians are under the delusion that while you purchase all of these ABM systems we Pakistanis will just sit back and watch as spectators?

 

[regular]

Its actually amusing and sad at the same time that you indians are under the delusion that while you purchase all of these ABM systems we Pakistanis will just sit back and watch as spectators?

Sir! these Indians/politicians/generals are buying ABM systems not just to defend their countries but for only kickbacks , using the tax money to fillup their pockets. Its the greed game ........

 

[mdcp]

India and Pakistan got minimum deterrence , thats more than enough, let spend on welfare of our own people rather than spending on weapons

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

Regardless of what version of the PAC the Americans were using during GW1 and GW2, the facts remains and the main point is that the Iraqis were firing outdated Scuds which are pretty much outdated for even the year of 2003,

Iraqia were firing other SRBMS in GW2 Abdali and Al_Samoud-2

Al_Samoud-2

As a matter of fact it was more difficult to intercept the Scuds as they would break up during trajectory

Patriot System Performance: Report Summary

One can argue that
these relatively slow missiles which did not break up in flight like the Scuds of Desert Storm, were not stressing targets; however, their short range and the coalition’s goal of large defended footprints and high-altitude intercepts due to chemical warhead concerns made them somewhat stressing targets for the Patriot and their crews.

and Pakistani missiles are no Scud's, though a few might have their origins from Scud variants but they are not Scuds since our scientists and engineers have heavily modified them, increased their range, and upgraded their internal/guidance systems. NASR BRBM however is in no way a Scud and does not originate from the former, therefore what the PAC-1 or PAC-2 scored against a few outdated Iraqi Scuds does not mean it can score the same against maneuverable,

I meant from the point of interception of TBMs, i agree that in reality things might be different , but based on PAC-2 performance in combat, the probability of intercept high.

fast, and short rage BRBM's like the NASR which is specially meant to dodge ABM systems, same applies to other Pakistan BM's as well.

The bolded part seems confusing here. Was there such a statement made by anyone related to project or test ?

If so, NASR's ability to dodge ABM seems more of disadvantage than advantage, First with limited trajectory and flight time the possibility of evading seems difficult to begin with, if achieved , the target cannot be reached because if recall Nasr is meant for precision strikes , in course of evading an ABM, Nasr ends up missing the target.

As for other Pakistani other BMs unless they are nuclear, evading an ABM is pointless, a Pakistani BM with conventional warhead on dodgeing an ABM will have the same role as that of a long range artillery i.e accuracy.

Its actually amusing and sad at the same time that you indians are under the delusion that while you purchase all of these ABM systems we Pakistanis will just sit back and watch as spectators?

It funny some people think India will purchase all ABMs systems to counter BM threat from Pakistan, If India obtains any they"ll be point defence system plus SAMs and ABM deployment and development are expensive. India will only obtain them if really necessary.

 

[Zarvan]

Pakistan to test fires new ballistic missile ‘Nasr’ by end of May

INP 12 hrs ago | Comments (0)

KARACHI - Pakistan will test fire its new missile “Nasr” by the end of this month and most likely on May 28. The missile with 180 Kilometers range has high degree of accuracy.

According to sources, Pakistan army has completed all its preparation to test fire the nuclear-capable, surface-to-surface ballistic missile “Nasr” on May 28 Monday. The name "Nasr" is an Arabic word meaning "Victory".

‘Nasr can carry nuclear warheads and can hit the target with high accuracy, it is learnt.
“The missile has been developed to add deterrence to Pakistan’s strategic weapons development programme”.

Pakistan to test fires new ballistic missile



* Previous version had a test range of 60 kilometers.

Can this missile be used just as a rocket fitted with other lethal things to destroy Enemy Tanks and other things and also have they increased the range of this missile ?

May 19 Lahor: Pakistan’s new Battlefield Range Ballistic Missile (BRBM) Nasr, developed by the National Development Complex (NDC) will undergo tests by the end of this month. The name Nasr is an Arabic word meaning Victory. Nasr can carry nuclear warheads and can hit the target with high accuracy.
This is the third missile test to be conducted by the Pakistani Armed Forces in a few months time. Last March, it had tested the nuclear capable Short-Range Ballistic Missile (SRBM) Abdali-I. The Hatf-III (Ghaznavi) SRBM was also tested by the Pakistanis early this month.
The Nasr, which uses the solid fuel propellant system, is having an effective operational range of up to 110 miles. The missile, which is also known asHatf-IX, was first tested on 19 April 2011. The missile can be fired from a Transporter Erector Launcher (TEL) and can be armed either with a nuclear warhead or a conventional high-explosive warhead. The short operational range of the missile means that it is more likely to be used as a defence option, rather than as an offensive one. The missile, which the Pakistani experts claim is one of the most accurate SRBMs in the world, is capable of inflicting heavy damage upon attacking armoured brigades and infantry battalions.
The Nasr is the latest missile developed under the Pakistani missile research and development program, which was initiated nearly three decades ago. The program, which initially focussed on the SRBMs, achieved its first major breakthrough in 1997, with the development of the Medium Range Ballistic Missile (MRBM). In 2005, Pakistan developed its first ground-launched cruise missile, the Hatf VII (Babur). The Air Launched Cruise Missile (ALCM), Ra’ad was developed two years later.
The Nasr is just one of the six SRBMs which the Pakistan Armed Forces are operating. The Hatf-I was the first ballistic missile the Pakistani armed forces ever developed. Its successors, the Hatf-II and Hatf-III SRBMs were tested just a few months ago. The Hatf-IV (Shaheen-I) is being upgraded currently, with the addition of Multiple Independently Targetable Re-entry Vehicle (MIRV) capability. Apart from these missiles, the Pakistani troops are also in the possession of a number of Dongfeng 11 (CSS-7) SRBMs, which were purchased from China.
News Gathered by India News
Become a Hosting Provider
Get Domain Reseller Account Free .in domain Rs 115 Reseller Hosting in just Rs 999

Well How the hell this news is all over the place I don't think this has happened before that before the missile test the news is already in the media of future missile test being conducted

 

[regular]

India has no mood to challenge its neighbor sovereignty, don't worry india will not cross the border.

Oh thanks buddy!! I know U guyz cares about us so much.....