What's new

Gujarat does a double! Why can't India under the 'visionary' NaMo.

Yes, I agree. Strong regional leaders and weak national leaders is what we need. We want individual states to compete and develop and a center who bring everybody together by consensus.

No, we want strong National leader, because it's the policies of centre that makes the difference. And it's funny to say that Modi is doing well in the state but will fail in centre and blah blah blah... without giving him a chance..!
 
No, we want strong National leader, because it's the policies of centre that makes the difference. And it's funny to say that Modi is doing well in the state but will fail in centre and blah blah blah... without giving him a chance..!

I dont want a PM who is denied visa in other countries, and could have been tried for crime against humanity had he not been Indian.
 
Modi is too much political that weighs him down. I doubt he will ever make it PMs post, even though he is perfect for it. Nitish seems like the best bet for NDA at present.
 
Remember NDA survived because of Vajpayee who towered over the rest. Also they appointed George Fernades as convener who could bring people together.
Modi as PM candidate will not get you any partner to begin with, you have better luck with Sushma Swaraj.

BJP's greatest asset and their "selling image " to the voters in 2013 is their

1) development agenda

2) Their crackdown on corruption.

In both of these things , Modi becomes the Ideal person as PM candidate because his record in Gujarat speaks for himself. Other options may be Nitish Kumar but he ranks second to Modi.

Sushma Swaraj is more into party politics and party administration...she doesn't fit the image of a PM - running the country in anyway so I disagree.

Also she is untested , there are doubts about her capability - Compared to Modi's record in Gujrat , she doesn't have much to speak of during her tenure as Delhi CM or as Union Cabinet Minister . Apart from empowerment of women , she has not much success to speak of.
 
People still use bofors to beat congress, remember, and anti sikh riots too.
Gujrat is too recent incident compared to that.

ya.. that argument makes it cute!! no individual ploitician is hunted & haunded for those incidents the way modi is been targetted! those impotent leaders at the centre are so frustrated & threatened by modi's good work in gujarat, that they have no other option other than to keep dwelling on the past! when you got nothing to show for all those years of governance other than scandals after scandals of huge magnitude, you tend to rely on mudslinging on few people who are doing a better job for their people!
 
Have you seen what happened when they wanted Sajjan Kumar to fight election. People may forgive party but not individuals.

Oh please ...Sajjan Kumar is almost a non-entity as far politics are concerned ...Modi is a nationally recognized , democratically elected , successful CM of a state ...no comparison.

and there is no comparison to the charges involved either - Modi - accused of inaction and turning the other way.

Sajjan Kumar, Jagadhish Tyler - accused of inciting and leading rioters and mobs .
 
This will never happen till Rahul Gandhi is there .... :P somebody book his flights to Italy
 
I dont want a PM who is denied visa in other countries, and could have been tried for crime against humanity had he not been Indian.

why should that be an issue? so we want to choose a PM on the basis of the openion of outside world? that's an absurd argument! what makes you to come this conclusion that modi should be tried for crimes against humanity? you got no fainth in indian judicial system? ok.. let's take the case to ICC & try him there! afterall our ruling congress party is the epitome of human rights! why aren't they doing something about it??
 
This will never happen till Rahul Gandhi is there .... :P somebody book his flights to Italy

looks like there are dearth in congress for leaders! or they can't come out nehru/gandhi shadow! pretty sad for a so called GOP of india!!
 
why should that be an issue? so we want to choose a PM on the basis of the openion of outside world? that's an absurd argument! what makes you to come this conclusion that modi should be tried for crimes against humanity? you got no fainth in indian judicial system? ok.. let's take the case to ICC & try him there! afterall our ruling congress party is the epitome of human rights! why aren't they doing something about it??

Yes, it is an issue. Our PM represents us in international community, I am not sure Modi will really be liked within or outside our country.
Surely there are vocal Modi supporter, but remember most indian PMs are men of consensus, they are not like CMs.
Modi creates sharp polarization, some intensely like him and some intensely hate him.

BJP lost two election because they did not get their formula right. Modi as PM will make it third time unlucky.
 
Yes, it is an issue. Our PM represents us in international community, I am not sure Modi will really be liked within or outside our country.
Surely there are vocal Modi supporter, but remember most indian PMs are men of consensus, they are not like CMs.
Modi creates sharp polarization, some intensely like him and some intensely hate him.

BJP lost two election because they did not get their formula right. Modi as PM will make it third time unlucky.

Unlucky for whom?? for the people of India ... We dont want congress to rule our country for 100 years......
 
Yes, it is an issue. Our PM represents us in international community, I am not sure Modi will really be liked within or outside our country.
Surely there are vocal Modi supporter, but remember most indian PMs are men of consensus, they are not like CMs.
Modi creates sharp polarization, some intensely like him and some intensely hate him.

BJP lost two election because they did not get their formula right. Modi as PM will make it third time unlucky.

mate.. looks like you are reading too much in to this visa refusal by US. Modi doesn't need to do anything. US will fall into line on it's own if at all modi becomes PM.. have a read through!! you will know what i'm talking about!!

'It would dilute our influence to avoid Modi completely'

Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi is in the headlines once again. This time round it's thanks to WikiLeaks, which in a leaked United States diplomatic cable has revealed how the US diverged from its no-interaction stance on the Bharatiya Janata Party leader.

Modi, whose American visa was revoked at the level of the consul general in 2005 over his alleged role in the 2002 communal violence in Gujarat, was sought after by US diplomats owing to his fast rising stature in national politics, a WikiLeaks cable accessed by The Hindu newspaper said.

Analysing the importance of dealing with Modi, Michael S Owen, consul general in Mumbai, in a cable dated November 2, 2006, said: "If Modi does eventually get a national leadership role in the BJP in the foreseeable future, the USG (United States government) will be obliged to decide how it wants to deal with a figure of national prominence whose B1/B2 we revoked. We believe it would dilute our influence to avoid Modi completely."

Click on NEXT to read further...



'The US does not have a formal no-contact policy'
Last updated on: March 22, 2011 10:27 IST
If we waited to engage Modi after he attains national stature within India's largest and most important opposition party, many in the BJP would likely view this as an opportunistic move and only deepen the suspicions cultivated by some BJP leaders in western India since the visa revocation," the diplomat said in his cable.

"Since the riots of 2002, we have declined to engage Modi at the ambassadorial level, but Mumbai consul generals have routinely sought meetings with Modi whenever they visited Ahmedabad. We will continue to seek such meetings at the level of the CG to emphasise that the USG does not have a formal no-contact policy and to demonstrate to the BJP that we are interested in cultivating relationships with the party while it is in the opposition."

"Direct encounters with Modi will also enable us to deliver a clear message regarding USG concerns for the state of human rights and religious freedom in Gujarat."

'Modi is an insular, distrustful person'
Last updated on: March 22, 2011 10:27 IST
Owen also outlined his analysis of Modi thus:

"Modi has successfully branded himself as a non-corrupt, effective administrator, as a facilitator of business in a state with a deep commercial culture, and as a no-nonsense, law-and-order politician who looks after the interests of the Hindu majority. In public appearances, Modi can be charming and likeable. By all accounts, however, he is an insular, distrustful person who rules with a small group of advisors. This inner circle acts as a buffer between the chief minister and his cabinet and party," he said.

"He reigns more by fear and intimidation than by inclusiveness and consensus, and is rude, condescending and often derogatory to even high level party officials. He hoards power and often leaves his ministers in the cold when making decisions that affect their portfolios," the cable added.
WikiLeaks exposes US change of heart about Modi - Rediff.com News
 
How does one justify entry denial to an MP in a STATE FUNCTION ?!!! As for targeting him, the prick deserves it. Gujarat riots are still a searing reminder why he should be quarantined. If it were up to me i would not leave the fate of my nation to chance.

there was no denial..
THey were opposing and helding a protest before the rally.They got arrested and after she was on dias with NAMO.and he was giving speech the b**ch started walking towards him and said something to him so secrurity took her down from the dias..Dont make an issue out of it you congress dalal
 
Back
Top Bottom