What's new

Grand Siege of Kaaba ended by SSG under Musharraf ?

Zarvan

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
54,470
Reaction score
87
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Soon after the rebel seizure, about a hundred security officers of the Ministry of Interior attempted to retake the mosque, and were decisively turned back with heavy casualties. The survivors were quickly joined by units of the Saudi Arabian Army and Saudi Arabian National Guard.
By the evening, the entire city of Mecca had been evacuated. Prince Sultan appointed Turki bin Faisal Al Saud, then head of the Al Mukhabaraat Al 'Aammah (Saudi Intelligence), to take over the forward command post several hundred metres from the mosque, where Prince Turki would remain for the next several weeks. However, the first order of business was to seek the approval of the ulema, which was led by Abdul Aziz bin Baz. Islam forbids any violence within the Grand Mosque, to the extent that plants cannot be uprooted without explicit religious sanction. Ibn Baaz found himself in a delicate situation, especially as he had previously taught al-Otaybi in Medina. Regardless, the ulema issued a fatwa allowing deadly force to be used in retaking the mosque.[16]
With religious approval granted, Saudi forces launched frontal assaults on three of the main gates. The assaulting force was repulsed, and never even got close to breaking through the insurgents' defences. Snipers continued to pick off soldiers who showed themselves. The mosque's public address system was used to broadcast the insurgents' message throughout the streets of Mecca.
An elite unit called "Rahbar" of the SSG, the commando battalion of the Pakistan Army, headed by Major Pervez Musharraf now a Retired General of Pakistan Army and Ex-President of Pakistan, was mobilized and SSG commandos were rushed to Mecca from Pakistan on Saudi Government's request.[1] In the middle of the day, Saudi troops abseiled from helicopters directly into the central courtyard of the mosque. The Saudi soldiers were picked off by insurgents holding superior positions. After failure of this exercise, Pakistani SSG Commandos split/showered the water allover the Grand Masjid floors even in Minarets. This situation was very surprising for the insurgents that what was going to be happen next. On having water all over the floors of the Grand Masjid, Pak Army Commandos released the electric current in the water and insurgent suspended their activities and start changing their positions to save them from the electric shocks. During this Pak Army Commandos were dropped by helicopters into the Grand Masjid in different locations and they easily captured many of the insurgents alive. [17]
The insurgents aired their demands from the mosque's loudspeakers, calling for the cutoff of oil exports to the United States and the expulsion of all foreign civilian and military experts from the Arabian Peninsula.[18] On 25 November, the Arab Socialist Action Party – Arabian Peninsula issued a statement from Beirut alleging to clarify the demands of the insurgents. The party, however, denied any involvement of its own in the seizure.[19]
Officially, the Saudi government took the position of not aggressively taking the mosque, but rather to starve the militants. Nevertheless, several unsuccessful assaults were undertaken, at least one of them through the underground tunnels in and around the mosque.[20]
By 27 November, most of the mosque was retaken by the Saudi National Guard and the Army, though they suffered heavy casualties in the assault. In the catacombs under the mosque, however, several militants continued to resist and tear gas was used to force them out.[21] Several of the top militants escaped the siege [22] and days later sporadic fighting erupted in other parts of the city in trying to capture them.
The battle had lasted more than two weeks, and had officially left "255 pilgrims, troops and fanatics" killed and "another 560 injured ... although diplomats suggested the toll was higher."[citation needed] Military casualties were 127 dead and 451 injured.[23]
Grand Mosque Seizure - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia @Aeronaut @Leader @Oscar @nuclearpak @Icarus @Rafi @Areesh @balixd @HRK @Arabian Legend @Yzd Khalifa @JUBA @al-Hasani @BLACK EAGLE @DESERT FIGHTER @Imran Khan @jaibi @A.Rafay and others
 
Last edited by a moderator:
. .
was there any detachment of Pak SSG at that time??

anyway many suggest that they were asked or rather advised not to disclose or accept or claim that any Pakistani commando took part in that operation

was there any detachment of Pak SSG at that time??

anyway many suggest that they were asked or rather advised not to disclose or accept or claim that any Pakistani commando took part in that operation.
 
.
was there any detachment of Pak SSG at that time??

anyway many suggest that they were asked or rather advised not to disclose or accept or claim that any Pakistani commando took part in that operation

was there any detachment of Pak SSG at that time??

anyway many suggest that they were asked or rather advised not to disclose or accept or claim that any Pakistani commando took part in that operation.

SSG took part in that operation that is known to every one that is a fact they were they ones to who took out those militants

I am only shocked by Musharraf as their leader that is only thing which shocked me
 
.
SSG took part in that operation that is known to every one that is a fact they were they ones to who took out those militants

I am only shocked by Musharraf as their leader that is only thing which shocked me

I really don't know but there are reports and claims that suggest otherwise.

As I said that many were suggested to keep a mum over involvement of Pakistani commandos in ending the siege.

More evidence is in support of involvement of French commandos too.
 
.
SSG took part in that operation that is known to every one that is a fact they were they ones to who took out those militants

I am only shocked by Musharraf as their leader that is only thing which shocked me

But from where you pick this story..........what is a source............I also have a different version of story.......but first i want a source of your story..
 
.
But from where you pick this story..........what is a source............I also have a different version of story.......but first i want a source of your story..

I posted the source above wikki Mr what do you know about this operation
 
.
But from where you pick this story..........what is a source............I also have a different version of story.......but first i want a source of your story..

That part is recently added into Wikipedia article by some fanboy - can be someone from PDF :pop:
 
.
was there any detachment of Pak SSG at that time??

anyway many suggest that they were asked or rather advised not to disclose or accept or claim that any Pakistani commando took part in that operation

was there any detachment of Pak SSG at that time??

anyway many suggest that they were asked or rather advised not to disclose or accept or claim that any Pakistani commando took part in that operation.

It is correct that Pak SSG ultimately got the issue resolved. I did not know that the det commander was PM
 
.
was there any detachment of Pak SSG at that time??

anyway many suggest that they were asked or rather advised not to disclose or accept or claim that any Pakistani commando took part in that operation

was there any detachment of Pak SSG at that time??

anyway many suggest that they were asked or rather advised not to disclose or accept or claim that any Pakistani commando took part in that operation.

was there any detachment of Pak SSG at that time??

No, they assisted us unconditionally.



anyway many suggest that they were asked or rather advised not to disclose or accept or claim that any Pakistani commando took part in that operation.

This goes in contrast to what they taught us.

That part is recently added into Wikipedia article by some fanboy - can be someone from PDF :pop:

:rofl: :lol: ^ LoL sarcasm much? :cheesy:?
 
.
No, they assisted us unconditionally.

:) always.





This goes in contrast to what they taught us.

I was talking about the Pakistanis. I don't know personally but those who knew and were close said they were suggested not to claim or own anything like that.



But since you are Saudian and may be knowing more hence I believe your post.
 
. .
from what i have heard, it was the French special force which lead the operation and it was French idea to use this water trick. SSG was also supporting the operation but it was the French who were leading it. i read this info somewhere on this forum few years back and no one could contradict it from what i remember.
 
. .
from what i have heard, it was the French special force which lead the operation and it was French idea to use this water trick. SSG was also supporting the operation but it was the French who were leading it. i read this info somewhere on this forum few years back and no one could contradict it from what i remember.

France's involvment was more like of a consultative one, while Pakistan played a key role in this Opt long with the SANG.

We didn't have specialized Comandos to handle a sitution like this.

I honestly don't know anything about the Pakistani version of the story, all I know is that the Saudis apprecaited Pakistan's help to go hand in hand with the SANG to destory these scums.


:) always.

I was talking about the Pakistanis. I don't know personally but those who knew and were close said they were suggested not to claim or own anything like that.



But since you are Saudian and may be knowing more hence I believe your post.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom