Always Neutral
BANNED
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2007
- Messages
- 4,859
- Reaction score
- -20
Just curious ? What currency does Pakistan pay China for its arms.
Regards
Regards
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dear, airbus, sir
I would like to thank you, for your kind information. plz , explore more on that issue, so that all the commrads, can get it more.
Blain,
Do you think we can produce a capable ELINT aircraft based on Chinese Y-8?
Most of avionics used in ELINT can be bought off shelves without restrictions.
The problem with Pakistan right now is that it does not have much time, the Great Satan is closing in from all sides. What Pakistan is doing now, it should have done that at least two years back. There's a proverb "A drop in time saves nine", I suppose the Pakistani leadership never imagined that things would come to this, they thought that the Great Satan could never afford to betray Pakistan again and that is the failure of the Pakistani leadership.
Donot refer to USA as the Great Satan, this is a moderate board and we'd like to keep the mullah's away!
So, you call yourself moderate and who calls the power which is responsible for most of the evils of today's world by its true name a 'mullah'. If your "ally" is such a benevolent power I don't understand why you Pakistanis are so upset about its recent actions, I don't understand why you people have such sinister thoughts about the "pure" intentions of your "ally". It is quite clear that you do not have any reservations about that "ally", you're too busy keeping your name in the good-book of your benevolent "ally", but even after all that your "ally" somehow thinks you're not sincere in fighting terrorism. Would you please elucidate why your "ally" chronically has such low faith in Pakistan ?
Surveillance Radars
Detection and Tracking are keywords........through fixed or ground-based radars, AEW and ELINT aircrafts. Now thats not some extra redundancy. If an intruding aircraft goes to low level, its AEW that shall detect it instead of ground-based ones.
When AEW is not available in a certain area, ELINT aircraft can provide detection using passive methods. ELINT aircrafts can potentially give a more long-range detection capability.
If an intruder turns off its radar and radio ie attacks in radio silence, ground-based radar and AEW should be able to detect them.
Bi-static capability can be introduced in both ground-based radars and our AEW platforms too. This shall give them advantage in detecting stealth aircraft and shall make them resistant to jamming.
For surveillance radars, there are some important parameters. First, 31 operating frequencies are USELESS if they are in the same band. If these 31 frequencies of JY-14 radar belong to different bands like 4-5 belonging to I-band (old X-band), 5-6 belonging to G-band (old C-band) and then some in lower B or C-band (called P-band in old system), then its ok.
Jammers and anti-radiation missiles specially work in certain bands...and all frequencies in one band are then covered.....
Secondly, the beam width (main lobe)....thats important because beam width plays central role in capability to identify individual aircrafts flying in a tight formation....
4-5 fighters flying closely at 100km from a radar may seem to be just one aircraft on radar screen...only a radar with a very narrow beam shall be able to do it....Its difficult to achieve because beam width increases with range.....
Then comes the side lobes and back lobes of a radar.......they play important role in jamming.....they should be reduced to minimum as compared to the main lobe....some anti-radiation missiles use these side-lobes for guidance...
Then is the sheer power output of radar......the more powerful a radar, the less effective is noise jamming technique...and more is the burn-through range of the radar against jammer....
PAF has got the jammers, they can do field trails of burn-through range....and sorting of tight formation...we can fly a tight formation of 4 fighters at distances of 150km, 100km and 50km range and then see at which range actually the radar picks up individual aircrafts.
Then a modular design,whereby the antenna can be replaced easily and quickly if destroyed by anti-radiation missile/drone attack......
The anti-radiation FT-2000 shall be valuable if its anti-radiation guidance is combined with all-aspect Infra-rad (heat-seeking) guidance in the terminal 4-5 kilometer range.
For HQ-9, if chinese are able to install one more guidance algorithm with option to launch the SAM on any of the two guidance options....
First option can be the present method of command in mid-course and TVM in terminal phase with one other method in option. This way when two shots are fired at an intruder in ripple fire and he counters one, he shall fall prey to other shot which is coming with a different guidance scheme.
Other methods can be to retain a single guidance method but the SAM should have the capability to launch two missiles at an aircraft while each one is guided by different frequencies of separate bands....this may mean at least two engagement radars within SAM battery or a single fire-control radar with this capability...
To improve kill probability against low-flying targets, I think that ONE fire-control radar be mounted on either a baloon or giraffe-radar type mount to better cover the earth's curvature....
So if we are using two fire-control radars in one battery, one can be on ground, other on the giraffe-type mount or on a baloon.
The ability to switch guidance from one fire-control radar to another for a missile which is already in the air,shall be an add-on towards becoming a real air defence.
Suppose a target is being engaged by a fire-control radar based on ground, the target aircraft dives down and goes below radar cover. Now if its possible to hand-over the missile in the air to the other balloon-mounted or mast-mounted fire-control radar, it shall make this engagement a success.
If all of the above techniques are combined, it SHOULD be a very capable SAM.
Dear shehbazi2001; sir
thanks for your priceless input, but what do you mean.... is it, that systems i put forward , are good to get?