What's new

Gaza-Israel Conflict | October 2023

. . . .
They bombed the Baptist Christian Hospital two days ago. They must not be allowed to commit the single greatest terrorist attack in the century.
They misfired on the parking lot (if it wasnt a hamas misfire).

Also Hamas just performed a 9/11 like terror attack before that. Does not stop you from seeing them as your “freedom heroes”?

But anyway. israel are not going to risk another misfire now, that will cost them all public support.
 
. . .

Interesting perspective. After all the wars the US is on collision course with most of the world.
 
.
Just my obs: but Israel is looking to drag this out for months if it has to.
Someone with background in military operations may chime in: This bombing by air, entering 3rd week, seems wasteful for a strip 25 miles by 5 miles. There can't too many 'strategic' targets anymore to waste those 'precision weapons'. Why don't they use artillery and at least target with more accuracy at lower cost? They can easily cover any point by lining up guns on the long side.
 
.
They misfired on the parking lot (if it wasnt a hamas misfire).

Also Hamas just performed a 9/11 like terror attack before that. Does not stop you from seeing them as your “freedom heroes”?

But anyway. israel are not going to risk another misfire now, that will cost them all public support.

You can't be that stupid. Are you playing dumb? They intentionally targeted and tried to blame others. Here we are seeing them threatening to bomb another hospital in real time. Are you gonna believe they didn't target it if they do?

What Hamas did was a prison riot/break. Which targeted Israeli Gaza Envelope corps/Brigades. Nothing to do with 9/11. And no one cares about 9/11 anymore after they see Western media and politicians openly support genocide.
 
. .
Someone with background in military operations may chime in: This bombing by air, entering 3rd week, seems wasteful for a strip 25 miles by 5 miles. There can't too many 'strategic' targets anymore to waste those 'precision weapons'. Why don't they use artillery and at least target with more accuracy at lower cost? They can easily cover any point by lining up guns on the long side.
This is my point.
 
.
Here is the problem...

With Marxism, the political and the economics are inextricable, meaning you cannot talk about one without the other. And if you somehow managed to separate them, you no longer have a Marxist system. See China.

But if you never engaged in Marxism, you can have the economy apart from the political, whether the political is from a dictatorship (see China), a monarchy which is also a dictatorship, or a democracy. Excesses in capitalism? See China. Does it mean excesses in capitalism does not exist in the US/West? Of course there is, but at least we do not deny it.

The point, going back to what Saddam Hussein said about US, is that sharing authority and power is unwanted to the point that it is unknown. Or %99 unknown. The idea that one branch of government can veto the desires of another is ancient like the Roman consuls who can challenge each other and the institutions approved it. Saddam Hussein simply cannot envision it.
A bit complex subject Marxism.
China is just the extension of Trotskist New Economic Plan. Chinese leaders are nothing more then hyper Khruschevs. Once Communist take power there is nothing left wing about the rule itself. Etc etc.
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom