What's new

Futuristic concept aircraft carriers

Futuristic concept aircraft carriers

ircraft carriers have always evoked awe and amazement with their size and capabilities of launching airplanes from their giant decks. Today the giant carriers that patrol the oceans belong to the United States Navy. These ships displace 100,000 tons and are over a thousand feet long. The U.S. currently has 11 of these super carriers with another under construction. Other countries have aircraft carriers but nothing approaching the size of the American ships.

The U.K and France have carriers less than half the size of the U.S. carriers. Although the U.K. is building a carrier with a displacement of 65,000 tons. Other than the U.K and France there a few other countries with smaller carriers. But there are two countries with very big carriers. Not as big as the U.S. but bigger than the U.K and French ships. Russia has one and China has another one.

Admiral Kuznetsov is the Russian carrier. It displaces 65,000 tons and does limited patrolling in the Mediterranean.

russian_aircraft_carrier_kuznetsov_jpg.jpg


There was a second carrier of the same design that apparently has landed up in the hands of the People’s Liberation Army Navy of China, the Varyag.

Varyag being towed in Istanbul.

varyag02.jpg


Varyag was to be an Admiral Kuznetsov class multirole aircraft carrier of the Soviet Union. She was known as Riga when her keel was laid down at Shipyard 444 (now Nikolayev South) in Nikolayev December 6, 1985. Design of the carrier was undertaken by the Nevskoye Planning and Design Bureau. She was launched December 4, 1988, but she was renamed Varyag (Varangian) in late 1990, after the famous Russian cruiser.

Construction stopped by 1992, with the ship structurally complete but without electronics. With the dissolution of the Soviet Union, ownership was transferred to Ukraine; the ship was laid up, unmaintained, then stripped. In early 1998, she lacked engines, a rudder, and much of her operating systems, and was put up for auction.

It was purchased at auction for US$20 million by Chong Lot Travel Agency, a company widely believed to be a front for Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) Chong Lot stated that the ship would become a floating entertainment center and casino in the Chinese SAR of Macau. However, this has been proven incorrect as the ship is docked in Dalian and painted PLAN grey. The Chinese Navy has reportedly named the carrier Shi Lang and received delivery of the ship in October 2010. Defense News and Intelligence sources claim that the ship has been refitted and will be put through Sea Trials in the summer of 2011.

Now that China is about to have an aircraft carrier in its inventory, there are some futuristic concept carrier designs showing up on-line with Chinese colours and aircraft.

china-carrier2.jpg


This catamaran design would be very fast in the water and allows for basically 2 carrier megastructures to be fused together.
china-carrier.jpg


china-carrier21.jpg


These giant ships would be giant targets also. The enemy would throw everything they had at the beast. These ships would be very susceptible to U.S. cruise missiles and torpedoes

china-carrier31.jpg


Taking the futuristic carrier concept to a whole new level is the idea of an aircraft carrier that could fly itself. A big nuclear powered platform that could fly at high altitude and launch fighter jets and helicopters while airborne.

helica.jpg


These renderings show the power plants as giant fans along the sides of these leviathans. It would be a lot of tonnage to keep in the sky for extended periods.

helica1.png


few more pics...

.....................

this is not the right aerodynamic design for future carriers flying in the air
 
this is not the right aerodynamic design for future carriers flying in the air

They are not using jet engines, they are using similar to turbo prop engines like the the V22 osprey.

When you use Jet engines then you need aerodyanmic shape.
 
Concepts come first and movies come afterwards, Some movies were done after thorough research in science and tech field and current trends in technology.

This beast is going to require a set of Beastly Engines running on nuclear fuel.
 
I have one most important Question, even if a Flying AC concept is realized, than it will be used as a Naval asset or an Air asset?? who'll claim it, Navy or AF??

This Platform will make the difference b/w an AF & a Navy diminish.

Will Be a Nice & Important Development.
 
nice thread. and inspired by avengers.
 
An interesting concept of submersible aircraft carrier.

Submarines_wallpapers_243.jpg

There are practical problems with a submersible aircraft carrier.

1. It can be easily detected.
2. The area of operations will be constrained, due to size and depth requirements.
3. The vessel becomes difficult to defend when it is submerged.

On the other hand a submersible carrier would be an interesting concept? It can launch 30-40 mini submersibles, just like an aircraft carrier launches aircrafts. What say?
 
There are practical problems with a submersible aircraft carrier.

1. It can be easily detected.
2. The area of operations will be constrained, due to size and depth requirements.
3. The vessel becomes difficult to defend when it is submerged.

On the other hand a submersible carrier would be an interesting concept? It can launch 30-40 mini submersibles, just like an aircraft carrier launches aircrafts. What say?

On that thought, US is indeed working on the concept of a nuclear powered mother Submarine which in turn can deploy multiple smaller SSKs.
 
To be honest in the age of long-range fighter bombers with IFR capability I don't see what advantage a "flying ACC" gives over a conventional sea-going ACC.

I think major nations should start looking into unmanned blimp-like Aerial refueling platforms like the kind seen on the film "STEALTH".
 
These giant flying ships would also be very detectable to radar and other sensors. But maybe they would have a cloaking capability, which would allow them to pass into enemy airspace undetected and unleash the wrath of the fighter bombers zooming off the decks.

helica2.png


The one below has the power fans running down the centre of the ship. It looks like a Chinese design

[/url]



Nuclear Energy is sufficient :cheers:

I think a motion video will be better for understanding. some screenshots are from the Doctor Who flying carrier concept that was owned by United states.


Doctor Who Valiant



skip to 0:20 secs
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think a motion video will be better for understanding. some screenshots are from the Doctor Who flying carrier concept that was owned by United states.


Doctor Who Valiant



skip to 0:20 secs

You're a doctor who fan too Irfan???
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Fans of Avengers?

Nuclear powered jet engines are not feasible.
 

Back
Top Bottom