France public debt will explode all records at end of 2014

[flamer84]

Another Indian having a go at Muslims?

Do you know that BD has less poverty than India, despite the fact that you guys had a 24 year head start

Yet,as far as i know bangladeshis go to India to work.

 

[UKBengali]

If you would do a little research you will see that we didn't get billions from the EU,true they gave them to us but our politicians are retards who couldn't use them so they took the money back,better said,most of them.We barely spend 8-9% of funds in the 2007-2014 period.This year Romania's economy will grow by 2% ,next year more and the new goverment prooves that it can absorb the EU funds better so from next year some 20-25 billion free money will enter the economy in the 2014-2020 period.

If,if,if...let's see about if,Romania is just fine and within the EU the decisions are and will be taken through the EU parliament in which Romania as the 7th largest member has a say.Numbers of Parliament members are distributed by the size of countries.

It may be hard to believe but I do wish Romania and the rest of the Eastern European countries well

I am sure that Romania will prove itself just as capable of building a prosperous country like the Dutch or the Austrians have.

Romania was unfortunate that it had been subjugated by Russia for over 4 decades after World War 2.

Give it 20 years and Romania and the other East European countries will all be up there with Western Europe.

 

[flamer84]

It may be hard to believe but I do wish Romania and the rest of the Eastern European countries well

I am sure that Romania will prove itself just as capable of building a prosperous country like the Dutch or the Austrians have.

Romania was unfortunate that it had been subjugated by Russia for over 4 decades after World War 2.

Give it 20 years and Romania and the other East European countries will all be up there with Western Europe.

Thanks.Well,not exactly,you can check,during communist times Romania was the worlds 5th!!(no joke) arms exporter,industry was developed,highest agricultural output in Europe,ofcourse the population was kept in semi poverty.The trouble really began in the 90's when the neo capitalists ran everything into the ground.Starting from the 2000's we ended the plundering in a way and started to rebuild.Still we wasted some 10 years ,10 years in which the industry,the whole country was robbed blind.

 

[UKBengali]

Yet,as far as i know bangladeshis go to India to work.

Now, you have spoiled it

Indian propaganda my friend!

Yes, in the past that may have been true with mainly BD Hindu's migrating there for economic reasons. The percentage of Hindus in BD fell from 13 to 9% from 1971-2000. Since 2000 the number has stabilised at 9%, reflecting the "catch-up" of the BD economy to India.

Yes, BD is no paradise but the Indian economy is a complete shambles, and when coupled with massive Islamophobia, any Bangladeshi Muslim going there would have to be completely insane

 

[EMERCOM]

Another Indian having a go at Muslims?

Do you know that BD has less poverty than India, despite the fact that you guys had a 24 year head start

Yeah sure,then why do banglas keep coming and coming to india as illegal immigrants??

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_immigration_in_India#Bangladeshi_immigrants

Now, you have spoiled it

Indian propaganda my friend!

Yes, in the past that may have been true with mainly BD Hindu's migrating there for economic reasons. The percentage of Hindus in BD fell from 13 to 9% from 1971-2000. Since 2000 the number has stabilised at 9%, reflecting the "catch-up" of the BD economy to India.

Yes, BD is no paradise but the Indian economy is a complete shambles, and when coupled with massive Islamophobia, any Bangladeshi Muslim going there would have to be completely insane

There is not much islamophobia in India with exception of South like Kerala,Tamil Nadu,assam.

Yet,as far as i know bangladeshis go to India to work.

http://www.niticentral.com/2012/10/...gladesh-has-turned-assam-explosive-16664.html

And how about you stop lying,ukbengali?
@INDIC , please tell us about the property laws to confiscate hindu properties in Bangladesh...

 

[INDIC]

Now, you have spoiled it

Indian propaganda my friend!

Yes, in the past that may have been true with mainly BD Hindu's migrating there for economic reasons. The percentage of Hindus in BD fell from 13 to 9% from 1971-2000. Since 2000 the number has stabilised at 9%, reflecting the "catch-up" of the BD economy to India.

Yes, BD is no paradise but the Indian economy is a complete shambles, and when coupled with massive Islamophobia, any Bangladeshi Muslim going there would have to be completely insane

Draconian Enemy property act led to the exodus of Hindus from Bangladesh.which was 27% in 1951 to only 8% now.

 

[American_Millenium]

You know, we, Russians, used to live not very rich. But in our country, such concepts as honor, duty and love to the Motherland - the usual things you do not need to show on TV.
And what have you? When China, Russia, India, Brazil abandon the dollar, and Europe will follow then your fleet sink and your vassals will fiercely divide your inheritance.
You have reached your wealth, enriching on the two world wars. You - the country parasite sucks the talent and resources from around the world. When you fall out, and this happen fast - the whole world will rejoice and exult. And very quickly you return to your natural state - the Wild West.

Even the American Wild West was more prosperous than the Tsarist hellhole of Russia. Compare us at our best vs. you at your best, vs. us at our worst vs. you at your worst.

 

[vostok]

Even the American Wild West was more prosperous than the Tsarist hellhole of Russia. Compare us at our best vs. you at your best, vs. us at our worst vs. you at your worst.

More prosperous? Oh, that's news. Russia in the 19th century by the richness and power rivaled only the British Empire. And in those days you still only do genocide of Indians.

 

[UKBengali]

Draconian Enemy property act led to the exodus of Hindus from Bangladesh.which was 27% in 1951 to only 8% now.

You are talking nonsense.

From 1947 to 1971 the percentage of Hindus declined to 13%

After independence it went down from 13% in 1971 to 9% in 2000, mainly due to the poor economic situation in BD when compared to India.

It has been stable at around 9% since 2000 as now the BD economy is on a par with the Indian one.

Since independence in 1971, Hindus are not discriminated in BD

 

[KingMamba]

"Yesterday, we slaughtered them and we will continue to slaughter them."

"It has been rumored that we have fired scud missiles into Kuwait. I am here now to tell you, we do not have any scud missiles and I don't know why they were fired into Kuwait."

"Our initial assessment is that they will all die."

comedy gold

They flew away...... like rats!!

More prosperous? Oh, that's news. Russia in the 19th century by the richness and power rivaled only the British Empire. And in those days you still only do genocide of Indians.

Oh please Russia at its best was never close to Britain at its best. Britain was the only real hyper power.

 

[AUz]

Yes, it was a historical force, but not of the magnitude you are trying to present here. If it was such a historical force you would not be writing this as an immigrant.

Me being an immigrant and Islam being a historical force are just two statements of facts. They have nothing to relate, dumbo

As I said, Islam is not a 'state' or anything 'physical'....

And regarding magnitude.....show me another socio-political-religious-cultural force in history that is/was a "global" force like Islam, which literally exists in every single corner of the globe..and which expanded to such extent just within 1400 years of its inception...Not to mention its tremendous influence on history..whether negative or positive. Heck, even the modern rise of West is related, directly and indirectly, to Islam, its expansion, its intellectual development/preservation of knowledge, its transfer of different ideas to West, and its empires etc..

You yourself accepted how Ottoman's domination caused Europeans to explore in order to go around Ottomans...and that exploration led to discovery of Americas.

Only Christianity might come close in influence, but Christianity is just a religion not a comprehensive ideological force like Islam...Anyways...

lol, you showed nothing kid. Only a litography picture while i quoted you Oxford university published material. Your weakness is evident in the fact you think Roman's didn't have golden embroidered textiles and similar.

Showed just a picture? Other than being a retard, you must be blind as well...

I showed you how Mughal Empire was way wealthier than Roman empire..

Here,

Mughal Empire at its height had more than 170 million people (almost 1/4th of total humanity!) and a GDP of approximately $ 90 billion! i.e about 4 times larger than Roman Empire at its peak! and remember, this is pre-industrial era...not like later where the GDPs just sky-rocketed due to industrialization...

The Mughal Empire. The New Cambridge history of India: 1.5. I. The Mughals and their Contemporaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 1, 190.

As I said, the wealth of Mughals is so well known that even Western documentaries talk about it. Watch "The Warrior Empire: The Mughals" on youtube...

But then again, you're stupid. There's also a problem of no reputable sources that will say Chinese or any other empire was so far ahead of dumb westerners in Rome that you claim.

I never claimed romans to be dumb or anything...I just made the comment that Han Chinese made significant contributions of humanity along with Romans at the same time.

I don't deny credit where its due, unlike your delusional a$$...

Who cares about a few hundred square kilometers of barren desert. Ummayad's left nothing of value, Romans left their footprint in arts, literature, law, war technology, civilian engineering etc etc etc....Then again Ummayad's lasted a mere 400 years..!

See, you don't know jack and talk through your arse...a typical western behavior...

First thing, Ummayads were taken over by another Arab dynasty called Abbasids..so Ummayad didn't last for 500 years...but anyways..

Ummayad-Abbasid left nothing of value? You are the biggest loud mouth ignorant I've ever seen when it comes to history...

Also, Ummayad Empire didn't have bunch of barren desert. They held Persia, Syria, Egypt, Spain, Indian lands etc...They held 30% of global population and extended over three continents....and were much, much larger than Roman empire ever was...

Arab civilization of Ummayad-Abbasid was undoubtedly the most dominant culture of planet for 500 years (750AD-1250AD) ...It laid the foundations of global spread of science, culture, and technology. Knowledge from China, India, Greek, Egypt, Persia, Arabia etc was brought at one place and spread around to different continents in such large scale for the first time in human history. Arabic-Indian numerical system, which forms the basis of modern mathematics, was formed/spread in this era, understanding of human vision was discovered in this era, Modern Algebra arose in this era, experimental sciences were invented in this era, experimental chemistry literally transformed our approach to sciences, thanks to this era...and not to mention what influence Arabic rule of Spain had on West...Not to mention the rise of the very sophisticated financial and commercial network across continents...the modern day concept of "Cheque" also comes from this era. In 10th century, a 'sakk' (the word which became cheque later) could be issued in country/state A, and could be cashed in country/state B..something never happened before in history. Abbasids left their footprint in sciences, maths, exploration, trade, law, military...Guess what? Abbasids influenced even other powers like Ghoris, which conquered India and formed their rule over northern Indian subcontinent by capturing Delhi. Abbasids provided them with damascus steel, and other support..hence Abbasid influenced matters way beyond just their geography in a significant way...something, Romans couldn't do to that extent. Not to mention Abbasids also laid the foundations of 'global' trade of that era...Abbasids regularly traded with Europeans, Indians, and even East Asians...their commercial and trade network covered all of the known world...Thousands of Abbasid Coins have been found in Sweden, Denmark, and as far as even Finland!!!!

According to estimates, hundreds of millions of Islamic coins and hoards were imported to as far as Sweden, Denmark, and Finland etc etc...This was the magnitude of global trade network that Abbasids established in the known world...

http://www.academia.edu/1722281/Islamic_Coin_Hoards_and_the_Trade_Routes_How_Dirham_Reached_the_North

How many thousands of 'roman' coins are found in Japan etc? lol...

====================

Look, both West and East have made significant contributions to humanity...Sometime, Eastern Civilizations were more dominant and vice versa.

Making claims that West is some how inherently superior to others or that West has remained more superior to East historically is just plain dumb and has no proofs to back it up....

West lead the world in past 300 years? Yes. But thats it. It did not remain ahead historically however.

More number of dominating civilizations have arose in East than they have arose in West. A simple fact.

 

[TopCat]

Draconian Enemy property act led to the exodus of Hindus from Bangladesh.which was 27% in 1951 to only 8% now.

India also has the same law. At least BD hindus can raise their concern about it but in India, no Muslim ever dare to demand the abandoned property of Muslim.

 

[vostok]

Oh please Russia at its best was never close to Britain at its best. Britain was the only real hyper power.

Try to google "The Great Game"
Russia in 19 ct. Defeated Napoleon - this could be done only Russia or Britain. If Napoleon had invaded your USA with 600,000, ten-year war-hardened soldiers - he would have moved America from west to east, and would not have met even resistance.
In the 19th century in America leaving the poor illiterate peasants, criminals and swindlers. And in Russia from Europe went to earn money educated Germans, the Italians, the French - and revered for the happiness of finding a job with a Russian nobleman. Because in those days people used to live in Russia is richer than Germany or Italy.

 

[flamer84]

Try to google "The Great Game"
Russia in 19 ct. Defeated Napoleon - this could be done only Russia or Britain. If Napoleon had invaded your USA with 600,000, ten-year war-hardened soldiers - he would have moved America from west to east, and would not have met even resistance.
In the 19th century in America leaving the poor illiterate peasants, criminals and swindlers. And in Russia from Europe went to earn money educated Germans, the Italians, the French - and revered for the happiness of finding a job with a Russian nobleman. Because in those days people used to live in Russia is richer than Germany or Italy.

As usual i have to correct my soviet comrade.In the 19th century the nobility liven in luxury in Russia,90% of the russians were peasants living like slaves under the nobility,Russia was an agrarian state,far less developed than western Europe at that time.

Winter defeated Napoleon not russian bullets and bayonets.

 

[sovcomflot]

Thanks.Well,not exactly,you can check,during communist times Romania was the worlds 5th!!(no joke) arms exporter,industry was developed,highest agricultural output in Europe,ofcourse the population was kept in semi poverty.The trouble really began in the 90's when the neo capitalists ran everything into the ground.Starting from the 2000's we ended the plundering in a way and started to rebuild.Still we wasted some 10 years ,10 years in which the industry,the whole country was robbed blind.

So then why are you so hateful for the communists if industry was developed and agricultural output was high ? You have been brutally deindustrialized by corporate tentacles..... I am a bit surprised.