TheImmortal
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2017
- Messages
- 7,091
- Reaction score
- -12
- Country
- Location
@AmirPatriot
Meanwhile the explosion looks certainly too intense for a planted explosive.
@TheImmortal
Sure it was a good move for the Israelis and they exploited a miscalculation by Iran.
However its a dirty measure that allows Iran to retaliate.
In a good strategic situation you don't resort to such action.
Iran screwed put but Israel used a high cost measure.
In some ways similar to Shahid Soleymanis assassination.
High cost measure? I disagree probably a low cost measure.
Solemani assassination was a amazing trade off for the West. They had a damaged base that wasn’t even theirs (it was an Iraqi base), but took the most important general off the board for Iran.
This too will be a great deal for the west because Iran will do nothing that is of significance just like the Al Assad base.
Iran has been bombed hundreds of times if not thousands of times in Syria and is still chugging along. Thus US having some damaged equipment at Al Assad is an amazing trade off. Iran gets to gloat it attacked the US via BMs, but Saddam already did that in Persian Gulf War I.
The list of “desperation” measures for Israel grows by the day. Let’s not forget General Allahdadi’s death by Israel as he was the most high ranking death prior To US strike on Solemani.