JonAsad
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2007
- Messages
- 14,178
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
All of it being true, of-course. The article indirectly implies--" You cannot have a 'good' experience in Pakistan without armed security and guides ".
A typical back packer might get killed without armed protection or honest guides.
a typical foreign tourist women in india- will get raped by the host indians-
what does that imply?-
Protection of tourist is a states responcibility- why have dual standards?-