Penguin
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2009
- Messages
- 13,047
- Reaction score
- 56
No
If a SRSAM is infrared homing or active radar homing, it wouldn't need seperate firecontrols, just data from a search and tracking radar i.e. MF Star.@[Because from what I've heard, Barak-8 itself can handle both long and short-range sea-skimming targets by itself, removing the need for a separate missile system with separate fire control and other equipment.
@[I would think P-15 Delhi, after the planned SLEP, would get rid of the Barak-1 VLS (if Barak-8 goes insome other place and not there), and use the new CIWS (for which RFPs are out) in that place,
along with the other slots already housing AK-630M on that ship.
Don't let that fool you. Barak-1 itself IS a CIWS. I.e. there are gun based, missile based and gun-missile combination based CIWS. Close-in weapon system - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (no no, don't whine about wiki to me)
I find it odd though that P15A reverts back to 2x2 AK630 config when this was dropped on P15. P15 has 48 Shtil and got a 32 more Barak 1 at the cost of 2 AK630. That's a good swap. Kolkata has 32 Barak-8 and 4 AK630. That's good enough for self protection but not when defending a group of ships. See Type 42 (granted Barak-8 is superior against missiles relative to Sea Dart)
What is your point?Vertical Launch System (VLS) - an arrangement for launching guided missile weapons vertically from a prepackaged canister. This maximizes both weapon storage space and availability as well as minimizing complexity - the launch system is open to the sky, meaning that the weapons need not be moved or aligned prior to launch, relying instead on their onboard guidance to align them once they have left the launch system. Typically, these systems are used aboard naval vessels, where space is tightly constrained and complex systems (such as moving launchers or reloading rails) are difficult to maintain.
The U.S. Navy's current VLS system is the Mark 41 VLS. It consists of several components, including the launch tubes (called 'cells') which come in blocks of eight (2x4); a remote control console, and a status indicator panel, both of which are mounted elsewhere inside the ship. In addition, there are control computers for the system. Additional eight-cell modules can be added to the base system to produce installations with greater magazine size; at least one must be a 'system module' which contains the control systems for the cells. In addition, a special module can be installed of which four cells have been removed in favor of a built-in crane, allowing the ship to lift and load its own replacement canisters into the cells from alongside without requiring a ship or dock with a crane of its own. The crane cannot, however, handle all types of canister - the Standard SM-2 Block IV and the Tomahawk TLAM canisters are too heavy to be reloaded at sea using the built-in crane and must be reloaded in port.
I already discussed the strike down crane module. Mk41 is scalable but adding additional 8 cell modulese to a VLS 'farm'.
And yes, you do need some electronics to control the VLUs. SO WHAT?
In addition, there a yet shorter versions called VLS Self Defence. Also there recently bacame available the Single Cell Launcher.There are two types of Mk. 41, differentiated by the length (or depth, depending on how you look at it) of the launching tubes. The VLS Strike can take the longest available canisters, allowing for longer (and hence longer range and greater payload) weapons. The VLS Tactical is shorter.
SO?
The Broadsword article indicates no missile are currently carried, just VLUs installed. The below-deck VLU reloading story still doesn't make ANY sense. It simply doesn't.32 VLS yes but total barak 8 missiles carried is 64. 100 KM maybe helicopter. Everything else other than nagin matches up.
Last edited: