Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The first appearance of an Egyptian special forces from the Interior Ministry armed with Russian sub machine gun Vityaz-sn
View attachment 427808
Read the title of the thread!Can you all please stop posting so much on egypt there is other stuff to post than egupt
The Czechoslovak Scorpion was one of the best too, but yes the Mp5 was German..that adds to its qualities..Looks good. Gonna be tough to find a better replacement to the Mp5. There's a reason why it's so popular and used by many SF's. The reviews on this thing are decent and the only downside is without a forward grip it gets hot on the hand. lol, so many weapon choices out there these days. It's like going to a pharmacy for some pain killer and you have 8 million choices.
EAF Rafales with Saudi F-15's.
New pic of Egyptian MiG-35 carrying R-77 missiles.
Read the title of the thread!
The Czechoslovak Scorpion was one of the best too, but yes the Mp5 was German..that adds to its qualities..
Scorpion
View attachment 428047
SVD Dragunov forward grip
View attachment 428022
View attachment 428028
There is also a new Russian sniper gun with the Egyptian forces now
SVD Dragunov
View attachment 428030
View attachment 428032
Also, Egypt added the new Russian assault rifle AK-12
View attachment 428036
And the Very powerful Russian AK 103
View attachment 428040
View attachment 428042
View attachment 428045
And the Russian PKM
View attachment 428046
The Czechoslovak Scorpion was one of the best too, but yes the Mp5 was German..that adds to its qualities..
Why would they do that in an ex..?The Paratroopers were using the Russian Ratnik personal equipment system and their small arms for this Ex.
View attachment 428048
Why would they do that in an ex..?
Are you still sketchy about the MiGs or have the problems gone away with them growing on us? Especially the camo on these ones. They are looking good.
And of course the huge BVR advantage.
Well, there is a light stealth fighter being worked on by Russia and the UAE, it was said that it will be based on the Mig-29, and that Sukhoi will get involved in it as well..Part of joint Ex is getting familiar with the kit and weapons the other side uses. If you're familiar with your ally's kit and capabilities then you're more interoperable. It's a fairly common occurrence.
The Russians will also be looking to export their kit. It would be the wrong move to introduce Ratnik imo to the Paratroopers alone. Wouldn't solve their overarching problems either.
I don't think I've knocked its capabilities or argued they weren't filling gaps. It's just that to call it a good addition I would have to view it in a vacuum on its own.
We've already gone through the drawbacks in terms of connectivity, maintenance, and training across the Air Force. But I think my largest doubt about it is its future. Is the MiG - 29 platform going anywhere in the next 30-40 years, or even the next fifteen?
We already know the Rafale F - 4 upgrade is planned for 2025 and there will be a user base in both France (which will skip 5th gen) and India who will push development constantly beyond that tranche.
Well, there is a light stealth fighter being worked on by Russia and the UAE, it was said that it will be based on the Mig-29, and that Sukhoi will get involved in it as well..
But Bro, this is no ordinary Mig-29..this is a MIG-29 M/M2, export name Mig-35.. and this Egyptian special edition has the Tag "Advanced"..I'm talking about the MiG - 29 being introduced now specifically.
The proposed Russian light stealth fighter is what is meant to replace the Fulcrum and will be a completely different fighter.
I don't think I've knocked its capabilities or argued they weren't filling gaps. It's just that to call it a good addition I would have to view it in a vacuum on its own.
We've already gone through the drawbacks in terms of connectivity, maintenance, and training across the Air Force. But I think my largest doubt is about it is its future. Is the MiG - 29 platform going anywhere in the next 30-40 years, or even the next fifteen?
We already know the Rafale F - 4 upgrade is planned for 2025 and there will be a user base in both France (which will skip 5th gen) and India who will push development constantly beyond that tranche.
One of these Mig-35s replaces 3 Mig-21..and this is a very conservative estimate due to the new tech, engine power, weapons load, reach..etc.. So 50 Mig-35 are replacing 150 Mig-21s.. and with much up-to-date tech..You make a good point with regards to the future of the platform itself. I haven't really given that much thought since I've been looking more at the immediate application. Besides the urgent need to replace the old aircraft, I think 'filling the gaps' and addressing long-standing and long-lacking needs was probably the other main focus of the EAF. This is just my opinion, but I really think that the restrictions on the F-16 in terms of not only operational requirements but also weaponry strongly influenced the purchase of this aircraft.
We know the AIM-120 wasn't and most likely isn't coming to the EAF's F-16's. Despite the MICA with the Rafales, that's been very nicely taken care of with the R-77 (which many will argue is more effective than the AIM-120.)
I also think it's safe to say that the AIM-9X is not coming to the EAF either, and that has also been effectively addressed with the R-73. Assuming that the EAF is getting the HMCS with these MiGs (based on one of those recent pics,) and with the missile's off-boresight capability, this could easily be the best short range missile in EAF inventory. As a matter of fact, the development of the AIM-9X was prompted by the Russian R-73. That speaks volumes as to the Russian A2A missiles capabilities.
So the introduction of the most advanced MiG to date to the EAF has effectively taken care of those two major dilemmas that have essentially hampered and neutered the EAF's F-16 fleet and its other fighters for over 3 decades.
Granted the Rafales and the MICA have solved that problem prior to the MiGs, but this adds another dimension and more importantly another source for the EAF which I think is very valuable. I also feel the Russian missiles are slightly better than the MICA in range and maybe better in short range maneuverability also.
The cost in comparison to the Rafale is obviously much better. It makes sense to have a utility fighter which not only has lower procurement costs and comes with excellent and highly effective weaponry, but also has lower operational costs. Plus I don't think the Russians will be breathing on the back of our necks about what we're doing with the aircraft like maybe the French and most certainly the Americans would do. Another plus?
Connectivity/interoperbility with a largely Russian based radar and SAM system in country probably has its advantages. I also think this aircraft, for the price tag has excellent defensive capabilities with its MAWS and ECM systems. It has grown on me, for sure.
You make a good point with regards to the future of the platform itself. I haven't really given that much thought since I've been looking more at the immediate application.
This is just my opinion, but I really think that the restrictions on the F-16 in terms of not only operational requirements but also weaponry strongly influenced the purchase of this aircraft.
Granted the Rafales and the MICA have solved that problem prior to the MiGs, but this adds another dimension and more importantly another source for the EAF which I think is very valuable. I also feel the Russian missiles are slightly better than the MICA in range and maybe better in short range maneuverability also.
The cost in comparison to the Rafale is obviously much better. It makes sense to have a utility fighter which not only has lower procurement costs and comes with excellent and highly effective weaponry, but also has lower operational costs.
Plus I don't think the Russians will be breathing on the back of our necks about what we're doing with the aircraft like maybe the French and most certainly the Americans would do. Another plus?
One of these Mig-35s replaces 3 Mig-21..and this is a very conservative estimate due to the new tech, engine power, weapons load, reach..etc.. So 50 Mig-35 are replacing 150 Mig-21s.. and with much up-to-date tech..
This is another dimension to take into account..
They have also been the most difficult to deal with in regards to funding. Unwilling to offer soft loans or long term contracts. The prospect of offsets also doesn't exist.
They will eventually want to undermine our attempts to export energy to Europe and continue to find things to leverage until they get what they want; the naval base they wanted since the fifties.
A simple answer is because of the size of Egypt and also because potential adversaries of Egypt have much more that that, qualitatively as well as quantitatively..Question is, why does the EAF need a 350+ fighter air force?