What's new

Egypt blacklists Hamas armed wing as ‘terror group’

Says the chain slingger living in the WEST about sucking nuts. Yes we love America and Bush and so what? in Kuwait the Arabs were naming their boys after George bush senior when Kuwait was invaded.
Amerca and bush used you as donkey ohhh wait you live in donkeystan
 
Being an Islamist is a bad thing its the same as being called a Christian fanatic.
To b a devout Muslim is a good thing but being an Islamist is a bad term and doesnt mean to be devout but to be aggressive and intolerant.
You are fucking retarded with your flawed logic.

If "christianity" is a good thing, then it would also be a good thing to be "Christian fanatic".

Islam promotes goods and bans evil, so being a "muslim fanatic/islamist" shall be also a good thing, it would be "being fanatic about good things and staying more away from bad things".
 
They support Hamas/Palestian to win influence of Muslims around the world and at home and it did seem to work until the Syrian civil war. I still don't understand what they really gained from influence of Muslims worldwide except for some positive attitude of some Muslims towards Iran.

And where has that support gotten them? Lool after all the leader/centre (or self proclaim one.lol) of Islam Saudi Arabia is still view more positively by Arabs/Muslims than mullah Iran who is viewed more as the bad big isolated heretic shia ppowehouse. Lool. They gained nothing from this to be honest, the Syrian conflict only make things even more worse for them :rofl: truth be told, religious sects is thicker than blood in this regard, the Sunnis of course will always prefer their own Sunnis brother(or even a christian infidel.lol) ver a shia heretic/devil any day.:lol::enjoy: No matter how much arms, support, backing the shia powerhouse offers them, reason terrorist group Hama's supported its 'Sunnis' terrorist brothers in Syria against shia devils Syria alawite government and its big devilish brother Iran. :sniper::chilli:
:D
 
You are fucking retarded with your flawed logic.

If "christianity" is a good thing, then it would also be a good thing to be "Christian fanatic".

Islam promotes goods and bans evil, so being a "muslim fanatic/islamist" shall be also a good thing, it would be "being fanatic about good things and staying more away from bad things".
No it isnt both christian fanatics and Islamist dont tolerate others and use violence on innocent people to achieve their objective.
Being devout is different then being a fanatic.
 
No it isnt both christian fanatics and Islamist dont tolerate others and use violence on innocent people to achieve their objective.
Being devout is different then being a fanatic.
And yet again, you are managing to become more retard than before with every new message of yours!

Do those "muslim or christian fanatics" that "use violence on innocent people" have labels on their foreheads like "I am a christian fanatic" or "I am a muslim fanatic"?

Let me give you a hint: No.

Those that show violence do not belong to any religion at all in the first place.

That does not really matter if they claim to be a jew, christian or a muslim. They are none of them.

If you act violently by using any religion to justify your actions, that means you do not actually have a religion in the first place.

Retarded people like YOU give the labels of "radical jew" "radical muslim" "radical christian" to people that act violently.

But in reality, radicalism of any of those religion would be in the favor of "far more peace" "far less evil" acts.

So, yeah, those violent people are "Radical Anti-Muslim" if they claim to be muslim, "Radical Anti-Jew" if they claim to be jew, "Radical Anti-Christian" if they claim to be christian.

You obviously just hate all the religions and you are not really doing anything to hold yourself back from showing it.
 
And where has that support gotten them? Lool after all the leader/centre (or self proclaim one.lol) of Islam Saudi Arabia is still view more positively by Arabs/Muslims than mullah Iran who is viewed more as the bad big isolated heretic shia ppowehouse. Lool. They gained nothing from this to be honest, the Syrian conflict only make things even more worse for them :rofl: truth be told, religious sects is thicker than blood in this regard, the Sunnis of course will always prefer their own Sunnis brother(or even a christian infidel.lol) ver a shia heretic/devil any day.:lol::enjoy: No matter how much arms, support, backing the shia powerhouse offers them, reason terrorist group Hama's supported its 'Sunnis' terrorist brothers in Syria against shia devils Syria alawite government and its big devilish brother Iran. :sniper::chilli:
:D
It's true that it gains nothing from that support but that's what the spirit of the founding ideology stems from. They pretty much depend on anti-Israel/"Zionist", anti-West rhetoric/actions to gain support from the locals and to hold the system together. Also when their religious revolution took place, politics involving religion was not very popular back then as the world was primarily based on USSR (communist) vs USA (capitalist) conflict so they thought they would easily win over the Muslim world but being Shia shattered their goal which Saudi Arabia used to advance their own agenda by playing "Sunni card".
 
And yet again, you are managing to become more retard than before with every new message of yours!

Do those "muslim or christian fanatics" that "use violence on innocent people" have labels on their foreheads like "I am a christian fanatic" or "I am a muslim fanatic"?

Let me give you a hint: No.

Those that show violence do not belong to any religion at all in the first place.

That does not really matter if they claim to be a jew, christian or a muslim. They are none of them.

If you act violently by using any religion to justify your actions, that means you do not actually have a religion in the first place.

Retarded people like YOU give the labels of "radical jew" "radical muslim" "radical christian" to people that act violently.

But in reality, radicalism of any of those religion would be in the favor of "far more peace" "far less evil" acts.

So, yeah, those violent people are "Radical Anti-Muslim" if they claim to be muslim, "Radical Anti-Jew" if they claim to be jew, "Radical Anti-Christian" if they claim to be christian.

You obviously just hate all the religions and you are not really doing anything to hold yourself back from showing it.
Im muslim myself by the way.........
Also being an "Islamist" is a term in the english language or what do you call people like ISIS?
They themselves believe to be good muslims (which of course isnt true) but for that reason they are called Islamists because they see their action justified by their religion.
Oh and tone down the personel insults.
 
It's true that it gains nothing from that support but that's what the spirit of the founding ideology stems from. They pretty much depend on anti-Israel/"Zionist", anti-West rhetoric/actions to gain support from the locals and to hold the system together. Also when their religious revolution took place, politics involving religion was not very popular back then as the world was primarily based on USSR (communist) vs USA (capitalist) conflict so they thought they would easily win over the Muslim world but being Shia shattered their goal which Saudi Arabia used to advance their own agenda by playing "Sunni card".

Out of the 450 million or so Arabs only a minority of confused and spineless traitors look towards the fake wannabe Arab Mullah's ruling Iran and their 35 year old Wilayat al-Faqih nonsense. Let alone most of the 1.6 billion Muslims of which the vast majority are Sunni Muslims.
Muslims will always look towards Makkah and Madinah first and not Tehran or Qom.

The Mullah regime and all its supporters have a 1400 year old grudge against Arabs because they were conquered militarily, religiously, culturally, linguistically and even to a degree ethnically. Their only card to find gullible supporters in the Arab world is to play the anti-Zionist card which has almost been shredded to pieces by now because it has been misused so much.

Of course this is just to gain influence not because they care.

As you can see the 1-2 Farsis here in this thread are only here to create trouble between Arabs. No trash allowed on this section.
 
Last edited:
You are fucking retarded with your flawed logic.

If "christianity" is a good thing, then it would also be a good thing to be "Christian fanatic".

Islam promotes goods and bans evil, so being a "muslim fanatic/islamist" shall be also a good thing, it would be "being fanatic about good things and staying more away from bad things".
You know what he means by Islamist?
So, ISIS,Taliban,Boko Haram,Al-Shabab etc all fanatic Muslims are ok for you?
There is a difference between a devout Muslim minding his own business,not trying to impose his way of life to others and an ''Islamist''(radical,fanatic) who only accepts his way or the highway(dead).
 
Im muslim myself by the way.........
Also being an "Islamist" is a term in the english language or what do you call people like ISIS?
They themselves believe to be good muslims (which of course isnt true) but for that reason they are called Islamists because they see their action justified by their religion.
Oh and tone down the personel insults.
I call them what the white house, the president of France, Hollande, Turkey, and all muslim communities decided to call them just like what they called the attackers of that france attack.

"Terrorists".

Watch this and be ashamed of yourself silently in a corner: CLICK ME AND FEEL BAD ABOUT YOURSELF

And by saying what you are saying, you are supporting this mindset:
 
Lets be clear. You cooperate with Sissy to eliminate Palestinian resistance. You and Sissy do everything to exhaust Palestinians and expel them from Palestine. To break the will of Palestinians, you even support or perhaps organize a coup against Egyptians.
Stop ur hysteria. Palestinians are growing much faster than Turks.
 
Out of the 450 million or so Arabs only a minority of confused and spineless traitors look towards the fake wannabe Arab Mullah's ruling Iran and their 35 year old Wilayat al-Faqih nonsense. Let alone most of the 1.6 billion Muslims of which the vast majority are Sunni Muslims.
Muslims will always look towards Makkah and Madinah first and not Tehran or Qom.

The Mullah regime and all its supporters have a 1400 year old grudge against Arabs because they were conquered militarily, religiously, culturally, linguistically and even to a degree ethnically. Their only card to find gullible supporters in the Arab world is to play the anti-Zionist card which has almost been shredded to pieces by now because it has been misused so much.

Of course this is just to gain influence not because they care.

As you can see the 1-2 Farsis here in this thread are only here to create trouble between Arabs. No trash allowed on this section.
Many religious Muslims especially from South Asia/South East Asia had very favourable views towards Iran prior to Syrian war as it were seen as one of the few nations that stood against Israel due to rhetoric and few military acts against Israel/West which ironically resulted in killing more Palestinians/Arabs and furthering Palestinians from quest for statehood. But after initial stages of Syrian civil war, now Iran is seen as an enemy of Muslims. Aside from domestic support, I really have no idea what they gained from worldwide influence.

I don't agree with the second paragraphs. Politicians around the world just couldn't care less about race or religion. What's valuable for them is wealth, luxury and power. That's the ugly truth in 99.99% cases. They could be personally racist but I don't think it influences the political actions they take.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom