What's new

Does the PN need an aircraft carrier?

India have 2 aircraft carriers bt pak. have anti aircraft missiles to destroy them.
welcome to PDF but do you think indian navy doesnt have aircrafts or anty aircraft or anty ship or anty surface missiles :azn:
 
If we want to defend Pakistani waters only than we don't need Air Craft Carrier but if we plan to establish Naval bases in KSA in future than AC will be needed in fact two will be needed

Wrong. To defend IN ( Cheaply / Quickly / Effectively ) , You need :

#1. P8s ( for IN Subs )
#2. AIP Subs ( for IN Subs / Surface Fleet )
 
19du6gcopnw56jpg.jpg

AIR_P-3_Taiwan_Truck_Transport_lg.jpg


This is a joke, before anybody goes ballistic. Cheers.

Yes, we can. Few months left, Pakistan will have it soon in the first quarter of next year. :woot:
 
I am curious. India has two aircraft carriers. when will Pakistan have one?

Hi,

We have letter carriers, we have pigeon carriers, we have tiffen carriers---why do we need an aircraft carrier---.

Our aircrafts fly----why do we need to carry them---. If we have a carrier for them---and put them on the carrier---and then they will forget to fly---and then what are we gonna do about that--hehn----train them to fly again.:rofl::rofl:
 
why would Pakistan need an aircraft carrier? We aren't trying to globally project our military - our military's task is the same as any super power or developing country but as far as strategic goals- we - are not the same as USA or Russia or China. What we will be having plenty of is anti carrier missiles - the Chinese have been most helpful in this regard rest assured. But we dont need air craft carriers plain and simple. It's just not necessary.

neither does india actually.....but it went ahead and bought soviet age carrier which would have otherwise been moth-balled and then eventually broken down for scrap metal

And why is that?
India is a peninsular country, and an aircraft carrier gives our forces a multiple point aerial defence option.
ACs are not only for power projection, it just gives our forces more options.
When our submarines and destroyers would effectively stop any aggression our Mig-29s along with the IAF will effectively provide a defence solution against oncoming fighters from multiple points i.e. land and sea.
When so many countries out there are opting for aircraft carriers including your beloved China and participating in exercises, your point seems no less than moot.
 
Wrong. To defend IN ( Cheaply / Quickly / Effectively ) , You need :

#1. P8s ( for IN Subs )
#2. AIP Subs ( for IN Subs / Surface Fleet )

None of indian subs has AIP .. Nor are they coming with AIP.. You might buy em later though... But not yet ...
 
19du6gcopnw56jpg.jpg

AIR_P-3_Taiwan_Truck_Transport_lg.jpg


This is a joke, before anybody goes ballistic. Cheers.

Do you know which aircraft is in the first Picture...

The A-320 that crash landed in the Hudson... Pictures of aircraft involved in accidents is not to be posted...
Indian Aviation Laws prohibit such Pictures.
 
Hi,

We have letter carriers, we have pigeon carriers, we have tiffen carriers---why do we need an aircraft carrier---.

Our aircrafts fly----why do we need to carry them---. If we have a carrier for them---and put them on the carrier---and then they will forget to fly---and then what are we gonna do about that--hehn----train them to fly again.:rofl::rofl:

The First Sensitive Post of the Thread.

None of indian subs has AIP .. Nor are they coming with AIP.. You might buy em later though... But not yet ...

ELITE Mia... Dimag Ki batti Gul Hai Kya ? Read my Post Again, Im not talking about INDIA buying Subs.
 
Hopefully when poverty levels in Pakistan are comparable to western world.

I would rather have a nice looking country with people doing well than an aircraft carrier.
 
A carrier costs as much as pakistan's defence budget. Carrier has a different strategic value, its not a tactical weapon.

If we wanted one , its was already inducted, but we are not here claiming supa dupa pawa like India... The weapons we need we already have all unlike india whose amo stock is not sufficent but they are making carrier ... I just want to say on India's situation is a Good Big *LOL*

A carrier costs as much as pakistan's defence budget. Carrier has a different strategic value, its not a tactical weapon.

If we wanted one , its was already inducted, but we are not here claiming supa dupa pawa like India... The weapons we need we already have all unlike india whose amo stock is not sufficent but they are making carrier ... I just want to say on India's situation is a Good Big *LOL*
 
Wrong. To defend IN ( Cheaply / Quickly / Effectively ) , You need :

#1. P8s ( for IN Subs )
#2. AIP Subs ( for IN Subs / Surface Fleet )
We have Orion and AIP Sub's will come but we will also go for nuclear ones soon.
 
We have Orion and AIP Sub's will come but we will also go for nuclear ones soon.
guess what :azn:

we already have two CBGs , neuk subs and worlds best ASW aircraft the P8I along with many layers of advanced and latest surface fleets even if you forget we are next door to you and have kept some 6 squads of MKI & jags and two each of M2K & mig29 for you stationed very near to your assets :D
 
as an offensive force - the indians wouldnt have a chance in hell.....PAF combat aircrafts in the sky and a hellstorm of ack ack fire and defensive measures ground-to-air would have your pilots shitting in their dhotis and thinking a hundred times before deviating into our side
So are you saying that the 30 Mig 29K in one of our carrier will go for pizza delivery and we dont have any SAM system.?:D
Have you heard about the LRSAM?

riggght.....and to keep your eyes on bengali fishermen and tamilnadu walas riding canoes towards their home Sri Lanka :laugh:

you certainly wouldnt go remotely near diego garcia that's for damn sure - they'd be watching you before it left shore every time

And where the hell the Diego Garcia come in to the picture?
 

Back
Top Bottom