deckingraj
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2009
- Messages
- 5,192
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
Hi,
How are you? 3 aircraft carriers----basically 3 battle groups---so possibly close to a 100 billion dollars worth of hardware in a certain area. That opens up all manners of retaliation from the opponent----in order for the carriers to launch their planes to strike the mainland, they will have to be in closer proximity---that makes them vulnerable to nuc strike right from the gitgo----.
A nuc strike would be the prefered strike---as it is over the ocean----no land mass involved---no civilian casualties---. The ocean is not so big to hide three battle groups---or 3 aircraft carriers with their escorts in this area---you are vulnerable to the enemy strike as the enemy is vulnerable to your strike.
The person who is going to lose the most in this confrontation will be the naval strike force---that one big loss will change the outcome of the conflict immediately----it is not worth it for the adversary to put that many a/c carriers in one place.
I mean to say---if you have another 5 aircraft carriers in reserve that can fill in---that will be okay---but just to place all your naval strength is not worth the shot.
But Mastan Khan sir will that not open pandora box of nuclear retaliation???? Is there a doctorine that says respond only if there is a nuclear strike on land??? Also what would the best way for a nuclear strike on AC???? The battle group will not allow submarines or kinds to sneak in a missile without first dealing with them, no????