Do you want Shariah law in Pakistan

[Android]

no i don't want sharia we are humans not animals

Imran bhai ye humans aur animals ka naatak band karo we all know the exact reason why you don't want sharia law

 

[Imran Khan]

100 lashes to anyone who has just hit puberty... will of course never have sex again

So, who decides and how whether someone has hit puberty?

if i have have sex but have no pubic hairs because i use laser tech

 

[Vinod2070]

My post 216.

Yes Sharia is sharia but when we say Iqbals sharia or Talibans sharia we are talking about which one is more in line with the Quran. So then my question towards these liberal fascists like bozo is, is what the taliban claim to be fighting for the law that is prescribed for Muslims in the Quran?? If any of these people can honestly say yes to this question than their own line of thinking is just as twisted as the Talibans and quite frankly they are just as big of a problem for Pakistan.

So it is all about the scriptures.

I thought Shariah comes more from the Sunnah and hadhith than from the Quran?

It should be easy enough for the scholars to blow the smithereens of the Talibunny version in that case if their shariah is not in line with the scriptures and Sunnah.

 

[JonAsad]

Some people Shariah understanding revolve around adultry- rape- blasphemy only-

There is much more to it than this-
No point in arguing with peeps about a subject they doesnt know sh!t about-

 

[somebozo]

Irrelevant but interesting


The first presidential candidate to face attack for his religious beliefs was Thomas Jefferson, in the campaign against incumbent John Adams in 1800. Northern clerics branded Jefferson not only a deist, but an “atheist,” a “heretic” and a “Jacobin” of the French Revolution. “The election of any man avowing the principles of Mr. Jefferson would ... destroy religion, introduce immorality, and loosen all the bonds of society,” wrote one. Jefferson himself did little to push back against the rumors or contradict the inaccuracies. From his perspective, religion was purely a matter of personal concern, not the business of the public at large. After all, Americans had overthrown the institution of the monarchy, which proclaimed the head of state to be also the head of an established religion that all the king’s subjects were supposed to follow. By contrast, the American Presidency was a purely secular office. Why should the voters care -- or even know -- about a candidate’s private beliefs?

 

[Imran Khan]

Imran bhai ye humans aur animals ka naatak band karo we all know the exact reason why you don't want sharia law

no but i am clear we can see 10% shariya law as example in taliban what if its imposed fully

 

[Vinod2070]

I thought my last answer would be able to elucidate it fully !

I'll use the same analogy again - Both Stalin's Communism & Democratic Socialism take root from Marx's works but both, practically, produced diagrammatically different results ! And why ? Because they were belief systems & like every other belief system 'Communism, Capitalism, Liberalism, Nationalism, Political Islam etc.' - They have a grave propensity for abuse !

So are you saying that Shariah is about "political Islam" as opposed to just "Islam"?

 

[Not Sure]

if i have have sex but have no pubic hairs because i use laser tech

Don't forget to use it on your face, chest, back, and bum too. There are many ways to check whether you are 16 or 61.

 

[Pakistan life]

Bhai the main problem is every one want sharia in pakistan by seeing it in Saudia/kind of in iran i belief as a individual pakistani we are reasonable practicing Muslim as much as spme one else(e.g I dont drink or do zina because i know the consequences of that i offer prayers) what else we want) khale sharia law country pe implement kar ne se kuch nai hona ye chezee adopt kaarne wali hote hain...

 

[Imran Khan]

Don't forget to use it on your face, chest, back, and bum too. There are many ways to check whether you are 16 or 61.

after that i am allowed? but why molivi mullah has child sex rapes enjoying more adultery and happy life and he is full of hairs like black bear

 

[SpArK]

• I have a vote.
• I voted yes.
• Dont know why.
• Hence sharia must be cool.

 

[Imran Khan]

• I have a vote.
• I voted yes.
• Dont know why.
• Hence sharia must be cool.

because you are our enemy

 

[anonymus]

@Armstrong


Bhai

Americans did put japanese americans in concentration camp during second world war.

For fact sake only.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_American_internment

 

[Armstrong]

Was that a serious answer yaara?

Dude IF I stand up and say that there is no god haven't I just committed blasphemy as per most religions including Islam? Are you saying that as long as I do not vocally espouse my POV in this regard I am safe, safety bought by silence? Or are you saying that as long as I do not mention the Prophet by name and add an invective to that mention I'm cool? What constitutes blasphemy- in simple terms using swear words with context to the Prophet or even disagreeing with his tenets and utterances as they have been recorded, if I were to state that I do not believe that what the Prophet did or say in a particular instance would I be committing blasphemy?

I think here 'actions are judged by their intentions' principal is going to apply; if you were spewing venom against the Prophet - You'd be charged with blasphemy after your day in court, of course !

But of course, if you're going to delve into the nuances of the blasphemy law & the whole discussion surrounding it, I suggest you talk to a Jurist or a Lawyer from Pakistan who looks at it ever so closely than the rest of us !

Say it is indeed a case of proven blasphemy, death then? There are nut cases all over the world who may kill someone and do kill people because someone insulted their faith or blasphemed against it but how many egalitarian societies have a sanctioned law which makes the act of vocally insulting a god punishable by death. How is that proportionate or even remotely serving "justice". Basically a person like me would be sentenced to death then, I see.

What is Justice ? What is 'right' or 'wrong' ?

Why should it be considered as anything else but blasphemy- why should it be considered creating mischief in the land- if freedom and equal respect to religions is to be accorded than any insult to any god should be considered blasphemy IN STRICT LEGAL TERMS under a framework where such a law exists with regard to a particular god to begin with? After all you do believe Sharia properly implemented will create an equal society for ALL?

I never said freedom & equal respect should be given to all religions; we don't think that any of the other religions are 'correct' & quite conspicuously so ! What I said was - Equal Rights & Privileges for all, that is, all citizens of the State !

Likewise if venom is being spewed against any other religion - It must be dealt with severely & decisively !

And no I don't think Sharia will create an 'equal' society; we don't place Islam & the rest on the same pedestal ! We think the Sharia will create an equatable society as per our world view.

In this age it is easy to get conclusive proof of adultery, it happens all the time- video tapes in HD? So if adultery is proven by such a technological implement, then death. For having engaged in sex with someone you're not married to its death? YOU'RE SERIOUS ABOUT THAT? That is your idea of an enlightened Islamic state?

We don't prescribe to the same notions of 'enlightenment' as the rest of the world does ! We believe adultery to be a social evil that rips the very fabric of society; therefore if it is committed it must be hushed up but if it revealed to the rest of the society beyond reasonable doubt then...yes - Carry out the prescribed punishment !

What of religious conversions- Islam expressly forbids adhering to another faith- that is to say a Muslim cannot convert to say a Judaism- its punishable by death. So would it be legal to convert, after all that is the first requirement of freedom of religion without which all talks of "all faith being equal" would be considered hogwash? IF it is not legal to convert "out of" Islam then in your "egalitarian"- I hope you envision it to be egalitarian- there should be law adjudicating equal punishment for converting into Islam too- otherwise where is the "equality" but then that would be impossible, no?

Not satisfied by your previous answer. But thanks for replying.

I never talked about 'all faiths being equal'; however I do not know what the prescribed punishment for this is or if there is such a prohibition or not ! If there is - Fine...do it !

 

[qamar1990]

Translation:
I have to work my a55 off at some 7/11 store or petrol pump to help ends meet but if Pakistan turns into an islamic welfare state aka free money handouts I will be quick to move back.

Good you have exposed your intentions of imposing hell on 180 million people so you can enjoy some free money! Typical Islamist opportunist mentality nothing else! What is stopping you from opening a business in Pakistan today? Ohh your madrassah friends have turned the economic viability of the country into splinters thanks to daily 72 virgin blow jobs!

You shouldn't be boasting your American passport shall you had an iota of intent to every return to Pakistan..I am well familiar with this disgusting burger-molvi mentality..you home, creed and grave are all in US of A.

oh faak you.
your just getting annoying now with your non sense.
how old are you anyways 12?
learn to freaking read so we dont have repeat **** over and over for you.
arrogant little tard.