YeBeWarned
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2016
- Messages
- 17,194
- Reaction score
- 12
- Country
- Location
You must admire his Dedication at least
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
See posts #14 and #15, Ayeshah.am confused, was that aimed at me? living in Africa I slightly know the geography!
please feel free to google Zimbabwe china all weather friend!
With the exception of 056, none of the new ship designs that have entered PLAN service (051C, 052B/C/D, 054/A, 022) have been exported, either in original form or special export form. I don't expect PLAN will put foreign needs before its own, so it will first build its own 055s before even beginning to consider export (if any at all).PNS should go for a few (4-5) heavies like type 055 ... with a total of 128 cell VLS per ship and plethora of AShMs and ASuMs, it will have a huge psychological effect on the enemies and boost the power and moral of PNS.
Can the same be done with PN's Zulfiqar-Class (F-22P) Frigates.
I guess they have the same basic design. Then it should be doable.
@Penguin , @Bilal Khan (Quwa) , @Arsalan , @Rashid Mahmood
6-9 km. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TY-90#FL-3000NWhat is the range for HQ-10? Is it similar to FM-90N on PN's F-22P?
italian navy ex ships are best option
Pls explain why e.g. a South Korean vessel could not be an option? Or even a cooperation with Myanmar?Only 2 options.
Chinese.
Turkish.
Pls explain why e.g. a South Korean vessel could not be an option? Or even a cooperation with Myanmar?
Indeed, used sale is out of the question1. Horizon Class Destroyers and FREMM class Frigates are very new ships in the service and not likely to be sold so early.
Any rearming would be prohibitive for these 25 year old ships, which in their current state have some design flaws, leading to various vulnerabilities (including the high concentration of weapons and ordnance on a relatively small hull, requiring a large crew for effective fire and damage control, as well as a coverage gap in the rear as far as anti-missile weapons are concerned ).2. Durand de la Penne-class
Number :- 02
Commissioned :- 1992
Displacement :- 4500-5600 Tons
3. Maestrale-class
Number :- 08 [7 Active , 1 Decommissioned]
Commissioned :- 1981
Displacement :- 3000 Tons
Those remaining with Italy are actually Soldati class, i.e. newer ships than preceeding Lupo's now sold off to other countries, and originally built for Saddam's Iraq but never delivered and ultimately seized and put in Italian navy service in early 1990s. SO, while built in early 1980s (and in that sense old) they have seen relatively little mileage. However, all their ASW equipment has been removed for Italian navy service and they've since not seen modernization.4. Lupo-class frigate
Number :- 08 [4 transferred to Peru ,1 Striken , 1 in reserve , 2 in Active Service ]
Displacement:- 2500 Tons
Commissioned:- 1977
NEW ships, with clear RCS-reduction by design, in both corvette and frigate range, suitable for adaptation to Pakistan Navy needs. As is, they don't need to be better than Chinese or Turkish ships. It all revolves around minimum necessary capability of the ship, required number of hulls and price.Cooperation with Myanmar? What the hell they offer which is better then turkey or China and old Italian or ausi/ British ships can offer?
Pls explain why e.g. a South Korean vessel could not be an option? Or even a cooperation with Myanmar?