DG ISPR on ICJ verdict: another 27th February for india...another surprise day!

[IbnAbdullah]

Salaam

The discussion seems to be going in circles here. I'm actually curious about whether the Indian members arguing about this here think the summary from the tweet posted by a member here is accurate or not.

I'm talking about the following tweet.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1151514480985034752

Posted by @Areesh .

Are any points posted by the person replying to PM Modi fabricated or false?

@Srinivas and other indian members.

Thanks.

 

[Jackdaws]

Salaam

The discussion seems to be going in circles here. I'm actually curious about whether the Indian members arguing about this here think the summary from the tweet posted by a member here is accurate or not.

I'm talking about the following tweet.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1151514480985034752

Posted by @Areesh .

Are any points posted by the person replying to PM Modi fabricated or false?

@Srinivas and other indian members.

Thanks.

Consular access can't be rejected. If it is, it sets a bad precedent. Any country can pick up an citizen and deny him consular access.

 

[Areesh]

Consular access can't be rejected. If it is, it sets a bad precedent. Any country can pick up an citizen and deny him consular access.

Yes it can be rejected. That is what bilateral agreement between Pakistan and India says

 

[Lincoln]

I will accept, Pakistan is a country which can stand up to ind the day kulbhushan is hanged..otherwise for me pakistan is a country which is scared of ind just like other south asian countries...Hang him and prove to the world that you are not scared of anyone

You will have to wait then. I like how you guys claim supremacy but lower your standard at each engagement. 27th proved a little different. Lets recall.

1. Pakistan won't strike back. Literally the Indian narrative all over Quora all night.

*Pakistan strikes back*

2. They missed! We managed to stop them!

*Mig downed, pilot captured*

3. Not our pilot! Not our pilot!

4. Okay, maybe our pilot.

You see? 4 stages of denial. You're going through stage 3 at the moment in this case too : )

Just remember, India can't do jack shit about it : )

 

[undercover JIX]

Salaam

The discussion seems to be going in circles here. I'm actually curious about whether the Indian members arguing about this here think the summary from the tweet posted by a member here is accurate or not.

I'm talking about the following tweet.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1151514480985034752

Posted by @Areesh .

Are any points posted by the person replying to PM Modi fabricated or false?

@Srinivas and other indian members.

Thanks.

which planet Modi is living on/?

 

[The Accountant]

Basically ICJ questioned Pakistani military courts and its inhuman procedures.
Secondly ICJ did not agree to the way Pakistan conducted the trial.
Third ICJ pointed out that Pakistan violated Viennna convention.
Fourth ICJ asked Pakistan to take back its decision to conduct a fresh trial as per Vienna convention providing consular access to Jadhav.

Yes surely this is feb 27 th moment where Indian Mig 21 chasing 3 F16, who were running away after a failed attempt to bomb Indian positions, shot down a PAF F16.

Just like Mig case. You are so insane ...

So he will still be with us.
We are asked to review the case as per our own legal system.
If above 2 conditions are agreed that ICJ simply accepted Pakistan's instance that he is a terrorist otherwise he would have ordered to be released and returned back to India. Isnt it ?

The only item which is not in our favor is concelor access.... So what,

 

[IbnAbdullah]

Salaam

Consular access can't be rejected. If it is, it sets a bad precedent. Any country can pick up an citizen and deny him consular access.

Sorry, I should've been clearer. I was talking about the following points made by 'Jagrity Sablok' in his/her tweet. I'm asking about the following points:

1: Kulbhushan Jadhav is not coming home.

2: His judicial review will be done by Pakistan's Court system, not ICJ.

3: Death Sentence still stands.

4: Councillor access can be rejected under 2008 bilateral agreement.

5: Terrorism charges not annulled.

Justice have Prevailed??


---


I hope that clarifies my question.

 

[Baby Leone]

where is this arnab gaosuwami chutiya? i want to see his usual frustration on live TV

poor indians.......good job by Pakistan.....BTW review process is already there in Pakistan what is new in it?

 

[SIPRA]

where is this arnab gaosuwami chutiya? i want to see his usual frustration on live TV

I think that Arnab Goswami would declare or would have already declared this decision as a great victory for Bharat Mata, as most of the posters on this PDF are also implying.

 

[Baby Leone]

I think that Arnab Goswami would or would have declared this decision as a great victory for Bharat Mata, as most of the posters on this PDF are also implying.

he is real joker BTW, he would still scream even in his so called victory thats funny

 

[Imran Khan]

konsi victory BC ajj bhi daal roti mili jail main . kalbhoshan at breakfast

 

[SIPRA]

konsi victory BC ajj bhi daal roti mili jail main . kalbhoshan at breakfast

I disagree. I have heard that he is so precious for us that he is being well taken care of. His life and health is far far more important for us than India.

 

[Dubious]

Wrong. freedom of choice of means is not without qualification.

What?

If this is about strength vs strength.
India and Pakistan are in low intensity war and India can also do what Pakistan has done to Indian national in Iran.



The tweet is total non sense, may be ISPR twitter army.

The court clearly said

1) The death sentence do not stand.
2) Military courts not acceptable.
3) Consular access must be given.
4) Jadhav should not be tortured, he should be kept safe in Jail.

Lastly ICJ gave a trashing to Pakistan to start behaving like a responsible nation.

The wording is "the court has held that Pakistan is guilty of internationally wrongful acts of a continuing character and it must cease those acts."

Definitely a surprising day for Pakistan for sure.

Please provide your source where you copied these wordings

The judgement came when Pakistan officially said that they no longer run military courts.

Where are you getting your news from? Ithurts.Com ya painfulburn.net?

ICJ never said military courts are sham or trial is sham.

In fact it rejected your appeal to annul death sentence given by the same courts

That is a fact. How hard it is to understand that?

It only given a chance to review death sentence (which Pakistan was giving anyways) and that too under Pakistani law and even that review can be done under military courts

Get out of what you were told by Times now or Republic TV or Zee news

Read the verdict yourself. Try to understand it objectively.

He is either in shock or trolling or really believes that shit!

Looks like you got serious comprehension issues. This is neither a victory to Indian nor Pak and will prolong

It is a victory just listen to the video and your comprehension will improve.

 

[VCheng]

No ! sorry not in case when a spy had been caught spreading terror in your country, especially when this guy is a serving officer of your enemy.

He wasn’t a civilian. He was a military doing wars act despite both countries not being in official war situation.

Yes, but Pakistan is a signatory to the Vienna Convention, and it must abide by it as applicable.

 

[AZ1]

Indian can only cry now like after 27th feb. It will take time to know the reality just like 27th feb