HypocriteHunter
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2016
- Messages
- 120
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Let me guess:What ideology did he gave up? Anti-corruption? Has he become utterly corrupt after becoming one of the political class.
After the jan-lokpal was passed the IAC members were not happy because there were many loopholes in it planted by the govt. and the alikes in the parliament. Forming a political party was a collective decision but anna and bedi left it midway. Atleast AK did not joined BJP or Congress as they were opposed to them all the way since the RTI fight.
1) Corruption, half of his minister are caught in corruption, even the recent Transport minister is gone just today in corruption.
2) 21 MLA were given a bribe as Parliamentary secretary and a bill was passed to allow them Ministerial salary and perks, denied by President.
3) Ghar Nahi loonga now biggest house of CM.
4) Security Nahi loonga, Gadi nahi loonga
5) Jan Lokpak will be passed in 15 days
6) Shiela will be in jail I got a 300+ pages report and bla bla bla.
He barely took any principle position he bragged about being a common man. Thats what I was saying all this holier than thou attitude and none of it implemented. I believe he should take Security and house as its impossible to work without them but its this attitude of saying something and doing exactly opposite and still claiming to be holier is ridiculous.
I dont want to indulge into his previous life where he asked Sonia to stop is transfer and stayed in Delhi for decade on Maldaar position or how he exposed ZERO corruption even after being an Income tax guy.
Forming a party was never a collective decision, I was there multiple times, at Jantar Mantar to Support Anna and Kejri, I was studying that time so I traveled 400 Km and all what I heard was some Haryana guys speaking about creating party not Anna. After 4 days he announced he is forming a party and later after few months he formally launched it so if you dont debate me about that it will be better for you.
You are really a kid a very small kid. If a newspaper endorses supports from a senator to Presidential candidate how is it unbiased?Do you have any link to what you said above? If not then dont make such claims. Media is biased in the national politcs but did the Washington post article said anything against any other national party in India? At best they praised the mohalla clinics and compare it to the American healthcare system I dont know how that is biased and I also dont know how that made you think that I am a 14 year old and makes it relevant.
search this: washington post 16 stories in 16 hours
Now this is not bias right? Its all PR exercise when will you people understand? Its free market media, NYT is against Pakistan one day and against India another day on the exactly same topic of Nuclear. Is it no bias? Come on man, lets put it to rest. I have better work to do than to talk about a hypocrite. You win.