Skull-Buster
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2006
- Messages
- 291
- Reaction score
- 0
No there is difference only in volumptous terms not others, because one is fundamentalistic part of another. The bad side of the good side when causes problems, let the side be x, it is named as good x and bad x, but x is included.
you mean to say that terrorism is the fundametalist part of Islam?
This is twist of tongue, on one hand one is claiming he follows Islam and on another hand one is using suicide bombings, what do you want general public to say that terrorism or islamic terrorism uh oh?
a person claiming to follow Islam and committing terrorism is the same as a person claiming to be a truthfull person and lying. you can either be a follower of Islam or a terrorist. you cant be both.
What is happening is East Timur is known as Evangelical terrorism, same in the case of 7/7, it is Islamic terrorism however not Islamic it might be but it is fact they are influenced by certain Islamic groups.
terrorism committed by christian/Muslim groups is not same as Islamic/Evangelical terrorism. when you say that one person is a Muslim terrorist or a Christian terrorist, you are talking on an individual level. when you use the term Islamic Terrorism, you are generalizing.
Read the two articles above, however you can be right the selective word of islamic terrorism can be used only in certain perspective where Islamic fundamentalism is present as the motivation.
Your mixing up Islamic terrorism with Islam, dont do that, just like Islam and Islam-ism (that seeks political power) are different so are Islam and Islamic terrorism.
im not mixing up anything. im saying that a religion should not be associated in any way with terroirism irrespective of what its followers do. this applies not only to Islam but all other religions.