Shut up if you know nothing stop claiming nonsense, Su-27 have RCS of 15 meter square but Su-57 have less than meter square RCS on various defense sites like Janes defense weekly/Flight global/Avaiton weekly, stop your nonsense BS claims
i am asking you to simple question, ARE YOU MILARTY EXPERT, or IN THE MILARTY FIELD??? your nobody to claim F-22 has bigger RCS than F-15???
But you're not the expert of any kind in military field all here we are talking about based on some source/evidence what is the world military experts thinks/ says, your personal opinion worth nothing here on PDF
F-22 uses a lot of titanium. It's heavier than F-15. Big RCS. Source:
The F-22 air superiority fighter utilizes more titanium alloy than any other United States Air Force aircraft. Stringent F-22 performance requirements led to the extensive application of titanium alloys. The F-22 product mix consists of cast and wrought versions of six different alloys and multiple heat treatments.
(PDF) Titanium alloys on the F-22 fighter airframe
PDF | The F-22 air superiority fighter utilizes more titanium alloy than any other United States Air Force aircraft. Stringent F-22 performance... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGatewww.researchgate.net
so I guess in the end the F-23 did win out
www.defensenews.com
Not possible bro First customer for Su-57 is Russian air force first let them induct in large numbers than it will possible to induct by PAFI would love for the PAF to procure 50 of these birds in the next decade. There is easily a requirement in the PAF for 50 long range air superiority bombers able to strike far away. The Su-27/30/35 series fits this perfectly well but with the SU-57 it is the latest technology at a very reasonable price (45 million). The engine, IRIST, AESA radar technology in the SU-57 is top notch and superior to the F-35. THe SU-57 equiped with something like the PL-15 would be a Rafale killer.
Hopefully with the increasing cooperation between Russia/Pakistan such a purchase may become a possibility. Russia is expected to invest easily above 10+ billion over the next few years in Pakistan in the energy sector alone. A huge potential exists between us to a create a super region trade block centered around Central Asia.
The titanium is there because it is far more heat resistance to increased temperature during super cruise. Remember the F-22 is expected to super cruise during most of its missions flying above mach 1 without after burners.
During the FXX competition the F-22 was actually outclassed in both stealth and performance by the F-23. The F-23 project team was led by northrop gruman which was know for its cost overruns associated with the B-2 bombs which costs 1+bn each for each bomber. Also during the test trails lockheed showcased live firing of missiles from within the F-22 which the F-23 northrop team did not.
Led to the USAF choosing F-22 for political reason (2 companies benefit ie lockheed and GD which employs 200,000+ employees). I strongly believe the USAF made a big mistake and should have actually went with both fighters as it would allow the US to also export to key allies like NATO/Japan/Korea/ Australia which lack 5th generation capabilities equivelent to the F-22. F-23s legacy did not die though as the USAF actually tested the 6th generation aircraft secretly last year and much of its DNA comes from the F-23
The US Air Force has built and flown a mysterious full-scale prototype of its future fighter jet
Does this give the Next Generation Air Dominance program more momentum, or does it open it up to more scrutiny?
I am sure china will help forment better ties between its two closest allies in pakistan and russia.I would love for the PAF to procure 50 of these birds in the next decade. There is easily a requirement in the PAF for 50 long range air superiority bombers able to strike far away. The Su-27/30/35 series fits this perfectly well but with the SU-57 it is the latest technology at a very reasonable price (45 million). The engine, IRIST, AESA radar technology in the SU-57 is top notch and superior to the F-35. THe SU-57 equiped with something like the PL-15 would be a Rafale killer.
Hopefully with the increasing cooperation between Russia/Pakistan such a purchase may become a possibility. Russia is expected to invest easily above 10+ billion over the next few years in Pakistan in the energy sector alone. A huge potential exists between us to a create a super region trade block centered around Central Asia.
The titanium is there because it is far more heat resistance to increased temperature during super cruise. Remember the F-22 is expected to super cruise during most of its missions flying above mach 1 without after burners.
During the FXX competition the F-22 was actually outclassed in both stealth and performance by the F-23. The F-23 project team was led by northrop gruman which was know for its cost overruns associated with the B-2 bombs which costs 1+bn each for each bomber. Also during the test trails lockheed showcased live firing of missiles from within the F-22 which the F-23 northrop team did not.
Led to the USAF choosing F-22 for political reason (2 companies benefit ie lockheed and GD which employs 200,000+ employees). I strongly believe the USAF made a big mistake and should have actually went with both fighters as it would allow the US to also export to key allies like NATO/Japan/Korea/ Australia which lack 5th generation capabilities equivelent to the F-22. F-23s legacy did not die though as the USAF actually tested the 6th generation aircraft secretly last year and much of its DNA comes from the F-23
The US Air Force has built and flown a mysterious full-scale prototype of its future fighter jet
Does this give the Next Generation Air Dominance program more momentum, or does it open it up to more scrutiny?
how you're PAF Air chief marshal and PM of Pakistan???
Your comment may somehow also increased RCS.
