F16V is better placed as LM is ready to shift entire production and assembally line to india with all kinds of toolings and rigs plus the propects of F35 maybe even in MII but boeing has a better plane but downside is its very complex and expensive why not rafale instead of super hornet when rafale is 40% more potent inevery field than super hornet i guess
![[Bregs]](/data/avatars/m/148/148509.jpg?1491816884){kind=avatar}
You've made a very clear case for no US fighters being inducted. No matter what anyone says, a single engined MMRCA is a LCA killer and this fact alone makes it untenable for any government. And trust me, no one in India's power circles sees the F-35 As a "sweetener" at all. Not only is it going to be horrendously expensive to operate, will come almost entirely closed to India (not even "teir 1" partners such as the UK get much access to the actual guts of the machine), is sub optimal for the tasks the IAF wants and would get beaten by the Rafale more often than LM would care to admit, but tell me why the IAF should be the ONLY airforce in the world operating THREE entirely different types of 5th gen/VLO fighter. If you're asking for a nightmare scenario this is it. Low availability, high cost VLO aircraft sat idle in their hangers for a significant period of time requiring intensive maintainence after every flight whilst the enemy with nothing but numbers on its side is at the fence. A mix of high availability 4.5++ and 5th gen VLO are needed along with next gen UCAVs, it makes no sense to put all your eggs in one basket because I assure you this weakness would be discovered at the worst possible time.
thing is that possibility is already taken care off as nothing goes as per plan but since china despite all that trade is leaving no chance to antagonise india we cant trust china aswell and have to take sides or will be on recieveing end from both the opposing parties ... we have to stand up and take a stance till we are strong enof to deal with them on our oun
well F16 cause israelies and americans both are replacing there F16s with F35 hence a mere upgrade and its plug and play for immidiate dilliveries to adress shortfall in squadran strength of IAF
Really? Sorry bro but I don't see it. What has the Indo-US relationship actually delivered from a strategic perspective in the past 10 years? Almost nothing worth mentioning but a whole lot of empty rhetoric along the way. India gave them a fair chance earlier this year but they frankly insulted India with the offer they made- no ToT, no co-production with an Indian partner and no formal clearance from US congress for critical tech that the OEMs were offering (basically that they had no right to do) all for price points not dissimilar to the Rafale offer which comes with none of the strings attached of American products.
See this is where the F-16 makes zero sense for the IAF. The F-16 is NOT a strike fighter, it may have all these trinkets and bells added to it over the years from block to block but it is and will never be a optimised ground pounder. It has a very mediocre payload capacity, limited low level strike ability and a highly limited range. Its MTOW may be quite a bit more than the LCA's but it is significantly less than the Rafale's (40% or more) and doesn't have the "legs" to take the fight to the enemy in their territory. Incidentally the Rafale has the highest payload and MTOW ratio to empty weight of any fighter in its class, the F18 E/F is about 40% larger than the Rafale but carries 3,000+ pounds less payload. It may suit the PAF's defensive doctrine that centres around A2A combat but it doesn't have any place within the IAF at all UNLESS it is that of the single engined air defence fighter and thus it would truly be stepping on the LCA's toes.
but bhai ji with latest AESA radar and new improoved latest gen avionicks suits and one of the most potent weapons package and 7.5 tonne load carrying capacity with option of CVT (which gives it a combat radius of some 700 km ) i guess its more than enof for westorn sector while MKI & rafale can take care of northen sector
So you want to fight F-16s with F-16s? This is another part where the entire proposal falls down. The PAF know the bird intimately, it would be foolish to think that some spruced up versions with upgraded electronics will give the IAF a clear edge over them in the same bloody birds! How stupid is the DM and Indian media that this proposal is (supposedly) even being taken seriously? What other adversaries are operating identical equipment?
Bro,
Only a political reason. And it's a very good reason. The only to select SH18, because tacticaly SH is not a good choice.
I'm not sure to understand you post.
You already have something to developp your Aerospace Industry.
It would be the only good reason.
Wasn't Boeing which stopped doors production in India last year as subcontractor? It would be surprising they give you the key of the SH entire line, with supply for USN.
3? It's one too much.
Tay.
