CV-18 Fujian - Type 003 Aircraft Carrier News & Discussions

[sheik]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1412714112937730048

“I matched them according to their aircraft elevator's ..."

That made my day!

I don't know if his ignorance caused his stupidity or it's the stupidity that resulted in the ignorance.
It's just amusing anyway.

 

[samsara]

The ship steam turbine for the 003 is so small, its length is less than 10 meters.

 

[samsara]

I'm pretty sure the US already knew the dimensions long before we did.

Of course for the inner circle! But the general populace of the USA just be fed by its mainstream media, and they do bite them.

The American society in average is so well known for swallowing up all the propaganda aired in 7x24 TV programming networks there. They know little about the world, and can care less beyond their own country... know only the US is the best in everything, the Exceptional Country.

 

[casual]

The ship steam turbine for the 003 is so small, its length is less than 10 meters.

It is likely for co-generation off the heat produced by the main gas turbines.

 

[Daniel808]

Type 003 Aircraft Carrier (With J-15, J-35, & KJ-600 onboard) VS Ford AC

Credit to @Louischeung_hk

 

[Deino]

Again a new image of the Type 003 aircraft carrier and it seems as if that huge gantry crane is lifting something ... maybe the power units / steam turbine engines that were delivered to the yard on Wednesday?

(Image via @ainicailin from Tieba)

 

[Deino]

Again a new image of the Type 003 aircraft carrier and it seems as if that huge gantry crane is lifting something ... maybe the power units / steam turbine engines that were delivered to the yard on Wednesday?

(Image via @ainicailin from Tieba)

View attachment 760872

For anyone who want a good laugh please look here as a reply to my tweet:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1413487271248994313

... and please see my replies.

 

[Globenim]

For anyone who want a good laugh please look here as a reply to my tweet:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1413487271248994313

... and please see my replies.

I think that guys sarcasm went over your head. His name is literally poop and cowpiss.

 

[Deino]

Chinese Navy's Type 003 Supercarrier
Credit to @louischeung_hk

View attachment 760239View attachment 760237View attachment 760238

100,000 Tonnes Diplomacy

And here an even better one ...

(Images via @西葛西 from bilibili）

 

[Deino]

So far IMO one of the best, if not the clearest image of the Type 003 aircraft carrier nearing completion of its construction at the Jiangnan Shipyard, Shanghai. That image even shows some internal details.

(Image via @CSIS - via @Maxar)

 

[waja2000]

So far IMO one of the best, if not the clearest image of the Type 003 aircraft carrier nearing completion of its construction at the Jiangnan Shipyard, Shanghai. That image even shows some internal details.

(Image via @CSIS - via @Maxar)

Waiting fans calculate dimension...

 

[Deino]

Waiting fans calculate dimension...

via @horobeyo on Twitter:

 

[sheik]

via @horobeyo on Twitter:

View attachment 762392
View attachment 762393

Some observations:
1. The elevator should be wide enough to handle two J-15's a time, not to mention the smaller J-35.
2. The island is almost 20m shorter than Shangdong's or 30m shorter than Liaoning's.

 

[kungfugymnast]

via @horobeyo on Twitter:

View attachment 762392
View attachment 762393

What is the width of Type 003 flight deck now? Is it wider & more spacious than Ford Class carrier?

 

[hirobo2]

OK, so if I understand correctly, Type 003 is a sort of Frankenstein CV. The reason being EM catapults are 10m longer than steam. So because they decided to switch to EM halfway thru, Type 003 would have been 10m longer (as long or even longer than Ford) and still wider. Am I correct?