Then the Pashtuns are certainly not the people of IVC, they can't invade their own land, can they?
BTW, Mughals were Pashtuns?
Oh yes, barring some expected regional differences, we share the same spiritual philosophies that even IVC people used to share.
Buddhism itself is an offshoot of Hinduism and shares the same dharmik philosophies. Besides, Buddhism came much later after the desertion of IVC. In fact, idols of Hindu gods were unearthed from IVC.
See, I have no problem to share the legacy of all of ancient Indian civilization including IVC with Pakistanis, but first Pakistanis have to take a stand on who they are primarily. They cannot be the 500 years (or 1000 years, as Pakistanis claim) of rulers of Hindus, 'proud murderers' of Hindus in Hindukush, the heroic invaders and conquerors, etc. AND the people of IVC at the same time. But can Pakistanis accept that largely they were not the conquerors but the conquered who later made heroes out of their conquerors?
But isn't taking pride in the genocide of their own ancestors, as we see in case of Hindukush, is simply deplorable?