What's new

China's Ambitions Reshaping South Asia as it Surges into India's Backyard

Jeez, do you guys really want china to have a war with india? why?? For what benefit and at what cost??

Any ways, I'm glad the politicians for both governments are not as hot headed.

Good one topjumper. It's good to know that atleast some people here do make sense. I completely agree with you.

Even if China being more big and powerful than India is capable of taking out India. It doesn't make sense for a country that's on the right path to progress to self-derail itself by going to war with another nuclear country even if India claims a no-first use policy towards the use of nuclear weapons.

It would be suicidal in some ways for China.
 
so what stopped u from coming and killing more indians in 1967 and 1987 because these time u were unable to come from our back and stab us,ur communist govt papa pissed this time and was ready to sign ceasefire ever before a single fire

and what abt the beating u took in 1979 from vietnam:rofl:

man the reality is ur pla is pathetic,not able to controll taiwan,got beaten by vietnam,and bragging abt india

but if ur sleep is over wake up u r sleeping since 1962,now its 2010:taz:

beating? vietnamese casualties were over 10 times that of the PLA. the PLA also beat the US in korea after mr. kim foolishly attacked without Mao's approval. north korea went at it alone, got predictably beaten by the US, then the US got beaten back by china.

1962 is given 1 sentence mention in our textbooks btw, for glorifying the military we use Korean War, 1969 Zhenbao Island incident and Vietnam War. Why would we find pride in beating a 3rd rate country? we're only proud of beating US and standing up to Soviets.
 
look at ur size and look at the size of vietnam and SK.Backstabbing India with just 15 years of independence.Pretty glorifying stuff.We know what the soviets and japs did to u.This is not ur propagandist prone stultified chinese audience using cpc filtered baidu.Come and take breath in free air ,only then u will know the difference b/w silver sky and golden cage.
waiting to see India's poverty figures.

what did the soviets do? get out of zhenbao island? :cheesy:

and the japanese backstabbed us when we were in a civil war. they also lost 1 million soldiers in china, 1/2 of their total military losses. what happened the last time japan attacked china in 1589? china crushed them with almost no casualties and sent japanese packing? if japan attacked again today, it'll be 1589 all over again.

also in the korean war, the SK troops were just cannon fodder for the americans. the only thing they did was boost the chinese kill count.
 
beating? vietnamese casualties were over 10 times that of the PLA. the PLA also beat the US in korea after mr. kim foolishly attacked without Mao's approval. north korea went at it alone, got predictably beaten by the US, then the US got beaten back by china.

1962 is given 1 sentence mention in our textbooks btw, for glorifying the military we use Korean War, 1969 Zhenbao Island incident and Vietnam War. Why would we find pride in beating a 3rd rate country? we're only proud of beating US and standing up to Soviets.

so u got ur mental masterbution to new level:rofl::rofl:

in post nomber 71 u urself told that u r unable to strangle taiwan just because of 4 american carrier strike groups,and now u claim u beat u.s in the korean war:hitwall:

is this what ur censored baidu show up in china:rofl:

and abt vietnam how the hell u think u won

ur pla try to invade vietnam chest thumping that they toppled cambodian govt and pla is just to protect their friendly Khmer Rouge regime

not only u run back vietnamese troop remained in cambodia untill 1989 only means that u failed what u attempted

u know what ur pla is so pathetic that it cant beat even somalia's army now in 2010:rofl:
 
so u got ur mental masterbution to new level:rofl::rofl:

in post nomber 71 u urself told that u r unable to strangle taiwan just because of 4 american carrier strike groups,and now u claim u beat u.s in the korean war:hitwall:

is this what ur censored baidu show up in china:rofl:

and abt vietnam how the hell u think u won

ur pla try to invade vietnam chest thumping that they toppled cambodian govt and pla is just to protect their friendly Khmer Rouge regime

not only u run back vietnamese troop remained in cambodia untill 1989 only means that u failed what u attempted

u know what ur pla is so pathetic that it cant beat even somalia's army now in 2010:rofl:

well, the facts speak for themselves.

in the korean war, china started at the yalu river in 1950. in 1951 we were at the 38th parallel. in 1953 we were still there. in 1950 the americans said "to the yalu by christmas!". They ended up pushed 300 km south and their general died. we won because we were fighting on land. china has engaged in large scale land warfare for most of its history, korea is familiar ground. on the sea? our navy can't compare back then. but now we have the 3rd largest navy. still far too weak though.

besides, what can india do? a few terrorists in mumbai killed 160 people and the army couldn't do anything. india also never had a 300 km push into enemy territory 1 year after national establishment against a superpower with 17 allied nations.
 
well, the facts speak for themselves.

in the korean war, china started at the yalu river in 1950. in 1951 we were at the 38th parallel. in 1953 we were still there. in 1950 the americans said "to the yalu by christmas!". They ended up pushed 300 km south and their general died. we won because we were fighting on land. china has engaged in large scale land warfare for most of its history, korea is familiar ground. on the sea? our navy can't compare back then. but now we have the 3rd largest navy. still far too weak though.

besides, what can india do? a few terrorists in mumbai killed 160 people and the army couldn't do anything. india also never had a 300 km push into enemy territory 1 year after national establishment against a superpower with 17 allied nations.

yeah what can we do abt that few terrorist but u people more pathetic,u were even unable to controll taiwan just because of 4 carrier strike groups
 
well, the facts speak for themselves.

in the korean war, china started at the yalu river in 1950. in 1951 we were at the 38th parallel. in 1953 we were still there. in 1950 the americans said "to the yalu by christmas!". They ended up pushed 300 km south and their general died. we won because we were fighting on land. china has engaged in large scale land warfare for most of its history, korea is familiar ground. on the sea? our navy can't compare back then. but now we have the 3rd largest navy. still far too weak though.

besides, what can india do? a few terrorists in mumbai killed 160 people and the army couldn't do anything. india also never had a 300 km push into enemy territory 1 year after national establishment against a superpower with 17 allied nations.

yes the facts speak by themselves,in korean war 114,000 chinese killed,21000 pows,380000 wounded along with 215000 north koreans also dead

in stark contrast just 36000 americans dead along with 1.3 lakh koreans

yet facts speak for u:rofl:
 
yes the facts speak by themselves,in korean war 114,000 chinese killed,21000 pows,380000 wounded along with 215000 north koreans also dead

in stark contrast just 36000 americans dead along with 1.3 lakh koreans

yet facts speak for u:rofl:

137000+36000 koreans and americans vs 114000 chinese. china also fought alone for most of the war since the north got paralyzed by the US before china even entered the war. also note china had WW1 level technology back then with the most modern weapons being captured from japanese army or made in the WW1 era Hanyang arsenal. and despite that the americans were pushed back 300 km.
 
137000+36000 koreans and americans vs 114000 chinese. china also fought alone for most of the war since the north got paralyzed by the US before china even entered the war. also note china had WW1 level technology back then with the most modern weapons being captured from japanese army or made in the WW1 era Hanyang arsenal. and despite that the americans were pushed back 300 km.

just take a close look at the figures i quated ur army were slayed(i dont say they killed-it was complte slaying)still u dreams of win-well congrates-and beware the 4 carrier strike groups r standing very close to u:rofl:
 
however if india was still under the british empire, it might be able to stand on china's level.
 
yes the facts speak by themselves,in korean war 114,000 chinese killed,21000 pows,380000 wounded along with 215000 north koreans also dead

in stark contrast just 36000 americans dead along with 1.3 lakh koreans

yet facts speak for u:rofl:

In the war, victory goes to the one who captured the ground. China had more human resources and UN had more firepower.

In the end, there is truce between both side. China had won the war because it had prevented the UN overan the North Korea.
 
Back
Top Bottom