What's new

China trying to improve ties with India: think-tank

It is ok, India still is a major player, and we will show you with some respect.

However, Philippines and Vietnam will be the next targets, and we need some war game with them in order to make our muscle more flexible, since it has been more than 30 years ago. :agree:

god bless your benevolent heart:bunny:
 
god bless your benevolent heart:bunny:

If you guys are already getting so worked up over the peaceful Hu-Wen administration, I don't know how you are going to handle the next administration in 2012. :lol:
 
It is ok, India still is a major player, and we will show you with some respect.

However, Philippines and Vietnam will be the next targets, and we need some war game with them in order to make our muscle more flexible, since it has been more than 30 years ago. :agree:


My apologies for replying to your post above. Another wasted thread.. Go on flex your muscles you nincompoop :wave:
 
And this discussion was going so well. :lol:

Well, I was being sane wasn't I? And what was the reply? That China will keep conflict with India on the side-burner, and perfect the art of modern warfare with its other neighbours.
 
well china should know one thing india is the same power as they are so only both country will affect there growth if anf conflict take place

yes if both country work together then world is for them
 
Just sit back and enjoy the show India....No need to take any forward steps to improve relations with China . First improve on our domestic woes , build up our military etc. Chinese / West will automatically come to shake our hand and engage constructively.
 
It is ok, India still is a major player, and we will show you with some respect.

However, Philippines and Vietnam will be the next targets, and we need some war game with them in order to make our muscle more flexible, since it has been more than 30 years ago. :agree:

Nice tried for China but try harder!
 
china should forget arunachal pradesh if it wants good relations with india
 
so!!!!
USA was the country who sent her 7th fleet to attack us but now look at our relationship!!!!
Its called Diplomacy
US president when they come to India say one thing and when they go to Pakistan say something else

US never attacked India with the 7th fleet. It was there to ensure that India do not attack Pakistan after overran Bangladesh.
 
US never attacked India with the 7th fleet. It was there to ensure that India do not attack Pakistan after overran Bangladesh.

wrong.

When Pakistan's defeat in the eastern sector seemed certain, Nixon deployed a carrier battle group led by the aircraft carrier USS Enterprise into the Bay of Bengal. The Enterprise and its escort ships arrived on station on 11 December 1971. According to a Russian documentary, the United Kingdom deployed a carrier battle group led by the aircraft carrier HMS Eagle to the Bay.[57]

he sent the aircraft carrier to turn around the situation in east Pakistan all to no avail because

On 6 December and 13 December, the Soviet Navy dispatched two groups of cruisers and destroyers and a submarine armed with nuclear missiles from Vladivostok; they trailed U.S. Task Force 74 into the Indian Ocean from 18 December 1971 until 7 January 1972. The Soviets also had a nuclear submarine to help ward off the threat posed by USS Enterprise task force in the Indian Ocean.[58] [59]

read more about it here

Task Force 74 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
china should forget arunachal pradesh if it wants good relations with india

Well If that's your condition ,we will counter-offer you this: India should forget fresh water from Tibet if it wants good relations with China, we're more happy with water than to have a burden to feed more people of arunachal pradesh once they join us, we can diverter water inland to safe some other area affected by draught and safe people that 100% loyal to China.
 
Well If that's your condition ,we will counter-offer you this: India should forget fresh water from Tibet if it wants good relations with China, we're more happy with water than to have a burden to feed more people of arunachal pradesh once they join us, we can diverter water inland to safe some other area affected by draught and safe people that 100% loyal to China.
China forgot Sikkim with ease.
 
Well If that's your condition ,we will counter-offer you this: India should forget fresh water from Tibet if it wants good relations with China, we're more happy with water than to have a burden to feed more people of arunachal pradesh once they join us, we can diverter water inland to safe some other area affected by draught and safe people that 100% loyal to China.


tibet.. wat water... North East India receives enuff rains ... no other river except Brahmaputra comes from Tibet... and if you stops that the real loser with be Bangladeshis... raising an international outcry ... China will be demonized in the whole word... specially in Muslim Countries... :) ... and diverting Brahmaputra in Tibet platue.. is impossible ..it will empty all your reserves with no end in sight.. good luck with that..
 
Back
Top Bottom