China paper calls for Alliance with India against US.

[ChinaToday]

Last time i remember, China got its a$$ spanked back to homeland by India.

hahahaha glad you correct the mistake on previous post, now i know viets dont think highly of india too

 

[twocents]

This is probably the opinion piece referred to by the Hindustan Times, with a little journalistic license.


China, India should treat competition rationallyBy Hu Zhiyong (Jiefang Daily)15:53, February 20, 2012 Edited and translated by People's Daily Online

The Fourth Meeting of BRICS Leaders will be held in New Delhi, capital of India in March. Indian Foreign Minister Somanahalli Mallaiah Krishna recently visited China. Representing the Indian Premier Manmohan Singh, he invited Chinese leaders to visit India during the period of the Meeting of BRICS Leaders.

In recent years, China and India's cooperation has made significant achievements in various areas, and both countries have maintained good coordination and cooperation in dealing with major international affairs, including border issues. During the meeting, the two sides signed a negotiation and coordination working mechanism for border issues to deal with emergencies on the border, paving the way for the Indian Foreign Minister's visit to China.

Of course, we must clearly realize that, despite the improvement of the bilateral relations in these years, the voices of fearing China, voices suspecting China and opposing China could still be heard in many places in India. But these voices cannot change the mainstream viewpoint of India. Far-sighted governmental officials of India propose to desert the Cold War mentality and rationally consider competition between China and India to promote the development of the China-India
The United States made its high-profile announcement to “return to the Asia-Pacific region” in 2010. Besides, it hosted the first U.S.-Japan-India trilateral dialogue last year. One of the main topics of the dialogue is on how to deal with China’s growing global military and political status. India’s participation put it into the “diplomatic network” jointly established by the United States and Japan with the purpose of besieging China.

Earlier this year, the United States introduced a new military strategy, aiming to shift its military focus to the Asia-Pacific region. U.S.-led multinational military cooperations, including U.S.-Australia-India cooperation and U.S.-Japan-India cooperation, have gradually become more institutionalized and normalized. The United States is now actively building a new Asia-Pacific strategic structure in favor of itself and accelerating its pace of strategic eastward.

Both China and India are the world’s largest developing countries and emerging economies. The two countries have many common strategic interests, notwithstanding certain differences. China and India have similar views and common strategic needs in many aspects of international affairs, and share common understanding and value judgments in quite many fields. For example, both are unanimous in opposing unipolar world while supporting a multipolar world; both need a stable and peaceful environment for development and advocate establishing a harmonious surrounding environment.

To this end, the possibility for both countries to make friendly cooperation is much greater than that of walking toward conflicts and war. Therefore, China and India need to deal with bilateral relations from a strategic perspective and actively adopt pragmatic foreign policies based on mutual cooperation and strategic partnership to achieve a deeper and deeper Sino-Indian relationship. This will be conductive to create a mutual trust and benefit featured Asian security environment and deter penetration from foreign powers who attempt to interfere with Asian affairs.

(Hu Zhiyong, associate researcher of the Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies under the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences)
China, India should treat competition rationally - People's Daily Online

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

Last time i remember, China got its a$$ spanked back to homeland by India.

and in 1979, China also got its a$$ spanked back to homeland by Vietnam.

if you call decimating Indian forces and keeping half their land, yeah, we got spanked in 1962.

if you call being able to kill 180,000 civilians with zero resistance and destroy more property than USA did in Iraq while your forces never even saw Chinese land, yeah we got spanked in 1979. Not saying its right, but only very weak countries allow another one to just walk onto their land and kill a few hundred thousand civilians. Iraq vs. USA is one example and Vietnam vs. China is another.

 

[vtnsx]

if you call decimating Indian forces and keeping half their land, yeah, we got spanked in 1962.

if you call being able to kill 180,000 civilians with zero resistance and destroy more property than USA did in Iraq while your forces never even saw Chinese land, yeah we got spanked in 1979. Not saying its right, but only very weak countries allow another one to just walk onto their land and kill a few hundred thousand civilians. Iraq vs. USA is one example and Vietnam vs. China is another.

Anyone could break into your house without notice and rob your place. It's nothing news. We made a mistake trusting you, but who doesn't make mistake and learn from it. Don't tell me you never make a mistake. Vietnam was never weak, we gave you our trust and you took advantage of that and betrayed us by broke into our country and killed innocent civilians who has no weapon against your armed troops. Then you claimed yourself as strong? lol, in reality only cowards would do such act. But it's okay, we already know your weakness.

 

[JohnyD]

Anyone could break into your house without notice and rob your place. It's nothing news. We made a mistake trusting you, but who doesn't make mistake and learn from it. Don't tell me you never make a mistake. Vietnam was never weak, we gave you our trust and you took advantage of that and betrayed us by broke into our country and killed innocent civilians who has no weapon against your armed troops. Then you claimed yourself as strong? lol, in reality only cowards would do such act. But it's okay, we already know your weakness.

I was not aware of this before...seems betrayal and backstabbing is in their blud...

 

[Yaduveer]

China have two choices before it ..
1. be independent
2. ally with India

India has 3 choices
1. be independent
2. ally with USA
3. or ally with China

So it's wise to explore all the alternative and their pro and cons. China is exploring it's alternative because after 10-15 years there will be only 3 primary powers- USA China and India and all others 'second rate powers' like UK France or Japan.

 

[lepziboy]

why is everyone so negative about it?its actually better than India and China resolve their differences.we would have our own strong Asian policy.Like what the british did to indian "keeping banners like no indians and dogs"now its gonna be "no british and dogs"im not attacking anyone its just the price a country pays to what it did to us in the past which i can never forgive the west about it.its time for asia to stand up.Politicians are way smarter than some of the internet trolls here.I support their wish for better India and China alliance along with Russia.March is gonna be a special month BRICS summit again lets see what happens

 

[airuah]

call being able to kill 180,000 civilians with zero resistance[/B] and destroy more property than USA did in Iraq while your forces never even saw Chinese land, yeah we got spanked in 1979. Not saying its right, but only very weak countries allow another one to just walk onto their land and kill a few hundred thousand civilians. Iraq vs. USA is one example and Vietnam vs. China is another.

I DO ADMIRE SUCH CHINESE BRAVEDO'S

 

[lepziboy]

Asia for Asians only.Syria conflict would`ve been better if the west didnt interfere.West wants us divided because they know ones we unite they will fall!stop listening to US.having relations with them is another thing but following there policy is not right!They dont own the world.

 

[JohnyD]

So it's wise to explore all the alternative and their pro and cons. China is exploring it's alternative because after 10-15 years there will be only 3 primary powers- USA China and India and all others 'second rate powers' like UK France or Japan.

If this is to be believed....India has more options than China..so, it has to decide whether to continue with its expansionist policies and making enemies all around or to behave like a matured man with common sense and practical approach to solve the problems..

 

[Luffy 500]

China out of pity is giving INDIA a chance. If they don't take it they will be left behind. China is saying that "don't mess with us.
Either be with us or against us." Bharat is punching way above its weight which will cause them to ultimately shrink.

 

[ChinaToday]

If this is to be believed....India has more options than China..so, it has to decide whether to continue with its expansionist policies and making enemies all around or to behave like a matured man with common sense and practical approach to solve the problems..

funny post , a country so much poorer and behind china has more options than china LOLLLLLLLLLLLLL

 

[CarbonD]

funny post , a country so much poorer and behind china has more options than china LOLLLLLLLLLLLLL

couple of points 1: China has poor people too, child beggars everything India has China has too you cannot change it. The shiny chinese cities is different from the villages poor farmers live in mate.
2: India has geological favour in defences as tanks and mechanised infantry cannot be used effectively on high mountains
3: India does not have good infrastructure on its borders so even if you are using tanks they will struggle to get deep into indian territory. This would gain enough time for indians to mobilise their forces.

 

[Splurgenxs]

funny post , a country so much poorer and behind china has more options than china LOLLLLLLLLLLLLL

Funny ..nahh...its hilarious...considering its clout China still manges to screw itself sideways.

Blame it on the greed ,or blame it on the Napoleon complex tht most Chinese face.U guys only got money to win people over and we all kno money only makes temporary friends.

 

[Alfa-Fighter]

if you call decimating Indian forces and keeping half their land, yeah, we got spanked in 1962.

if you call being able to kill 180,000 civilians with zero resistance and destroy more property than USA did in Iraq while your forces never even saw Chinese land, yeah we got spanked in 1979. Not saying its right, but only very weak countries allow another one to just walk onto their land and kill a few hundred thousand civilians. Iraq vs. USA is one example and Vietnam vs. China is another.

Well China attack with all strenght in 1962 with plan while india caught by surpass and was not expecting nay attack and only manned by small no of defensive units.

"Chinese troops launched an attack on the southern banks of the Namka Chu River on 20 October.[37] The Indian forces were undermanned, with only an understrength battalion to support them, while the Chinese troops had three regiments positioned on the north side of the river"

Under American advice (by American envoy John Kenneth Galbraith who made and ran American policy on the war as all other top policy makers in USA were absorbed in coincident Cuban Missile Crisis, Indians refrained, not according to the best choices available, from using the Indian air force to beat back the Chinese advances. The CIA later revealed that at that time the Chinese had neither the fuel nor runways long enough for using their air force effectively in Tibet


Many things happened and India learned a lot from that war, and after 1962 , Pak tried to attack kashmir in 1965 ,what happened? India won , and again in 1971 and then indian showed in Kargil also.

Till now India don't have any aggressive policy towards china since it don't have nay attacking div on china border nor any missile but since china has missiles pointed towards delhi and attacking army , India started to position itself, delayed Planes and also started deploying missiles for tactical purpose.

Since in China , Nuclear button is in hands on regional General, Therefore India decided to have attacking Division of army, If china attack out week positions so we can attack china week position and grab land , tit for tat .

Now India Planning to Deploy Nukes against china, India is not now what is supposed to be in 1962, in Next 5-10 years you will see a whole new set of army.

By the way China also kicked up by Russians