What's new

China deploys fighter jets to patrol new air defence zone

So you have now agreed to compare yourself with india. Good... :yahoo:

Not treasures :haha:

treasuries as in bonds ...:rofl: lol THE FAMOUS CHINESE IQ:omghaha:



:usflag::sniper::china::crazy_pilot:

So do you agree that US should station troops in India to protect India.
 
. .
I agree that we should first deport chinese from our lands. do you agree?

I was just mentioning that you are no different from US Southern racist in the 19th century. Thanks for reinforcing my assertion that you are such a hateful racist. And stop changing the topics now or attack me. Just accept that you are a wanna be storm front trooper reject. Anything else you say will be a distraction from that fact. Think hard about getting accept by a racist group. Think hard.
 
.
I was just mentioning that you are no different from US Southern racist in the 19th century. Thanks for reinforcing my assertion that you are such a hateful racist. And stop changing the topics now or attack me. Just accept that you are a wanna be storm front trooper reject. Anything else you say will be a distraction from that fact. Think hard about getting accept by a racist group. Think hard.

getting rid of you seditious chinese from our country is patriotic not racist. do you agree US should continue to help protect Taiwan from the chinese? do you agree that US should continue to fly in the free zone and ignore the chinese demands on self made adiz?
 
.
I hope you remember this plane, which was returned to America in "pieces" for actually being inside Chinese airspace:

I remember one noob fighter jet pilot crashed into this aircraft and died.seriously,PLAAF should train its pilots properly.what is this???that fighter was sent for escorting,not to perform Kamikaze...

I think thats the aircraft...

800px-KampfflugzeugF-8China-2009-01-04.jpg



and name of the pilot was Lt. Cdr. Wang
 
.
getting rid of you seditious chinese from our country is patriotic not racist. do you agree US should continue to help protect Taiwan from the chinese? do you agree that US should continue to fly in the free zone and ignore the chinese demands on self made adiz?

How about you shut up and go out and enjoy your life instead of talking utter rubbish on a forum.
 
.
I remember one noob fighter jet pilot crashed into this aircraft and died.seriously,PLAAF should train its pilots properly.what is this???that fighter was sent for escorting,not to perform Kamikaze...

I think thats the aircraft...

800px-KampfflugzeugF-8China-2009-01-04.jpg



and name of the pilot was Lt. Cdr. Wang

Hey he did our country proud. We had fun dismantling the US spy plane and gained valuable data from it.

Speaking of noob, the laugh is on your Mig fighter pilots. Their crash records were atrocious to say the least. you guys crashed half of your Migs, resulting in countless pilot and civilian deaths.
 
.
Hey he did our country proud. We had fun dismantling the US spy plane and gained valuable data from it.
Speaking of noob, the laugh is on your Mig fighter pilots. Their crash records were atrocious to say the least. you guys crashed half of your Migs, resulting in countless pilot and civilian deaths.

atleast they didn't crash on some Pakistani aircraft and triggering a diplomatic crisis like yours.and our migs crashed due to faulty parts,unlike your who crash a totally fine jet.

and making proud???you're proud for the death of that pilot???shame on you. :tsk:
 
.
Uh, they didn't ask for others to ask for any permission.
Uh, yes, China effectively demanded permission.

In fact, no ADIZ requires any planes to ask for permission; all they need to do is to track the planes and in this case the B-52s were successfully tracked with radar; stop making up these assumptions.
The real fact is that there are no rules regarding rules inside any ADIZ, so it is YOU should stop making up sh1t.

Here are the rules China made for this ADIZ...

Announcement of the Aircraft Identification Rules for the East China Sea Air Defense Identification Zone of the P.R.C.

China effectively said that prior entering this ADIZ, there must be a filed flight plan, prepared for two-way radio communication, display of national colors, and complete compliance to all Chinese orders.

There are no exceptions. So yes, China effectively claimed this as territorial airspace, same as over mainland China.

Look at it from a closer to home perspective...

There is a sidewalk in front of my house. The sidewalk is public ground. If I begins to set rules on who can use this sidewalk, when can it be used, how can it be used, and finally for how long by anyone, I have effectively called the sidewalk territorial property, even though it is technically owned by the city and legally accessible to all.

China have done just that.
 
Last edited:
.
Uh, yes, China effectively demanded permission.


The real fact is that there are no rules regarding rules inside any ADIZ, so it is YOU should stop making up sh1t.

Here are the rules China made for this ADIZ...

Announcement of the Aircraft Identification Rules for the East China Sea Air Defense Identification Zone of the P.R.C.

China effectively said that prior entering this ADIZ, there must be a filed flight plan, prepared for two-way radio communication, display of national colors, and complete compliance to all Chinese orders.

There are no exceptions. So yes, China effectively claimed this as territorial airspace, same as over mainland China.

Look at it from a closer to home perspective...

There is a sidewalk in front of my house. The sidewalk is public ground. If I begins to set rules on who can use this sidewalk, when can it be used, how can it be used, and finally for how long by anyone, I have effectively called the sidewalk territorial property, even though it is technically owned by the city and legally accessible to all.

China have done just that.
What a joke. Because it is a "No rule within rules" that each foreign planes should, not MUST, cooperate as a courtesy to safeguard security and maintain flight order to prevent miscalculation. You need to shut your mouth as no where did we mention that it is territorial airspace and we never halt or even attempt to block any movement of aircraft in the zone. All we did is monitor and send aircraft to check which is the international norm dealing with the same scenario.

Your analogy is a joke. If someone continues to walk on my sidewalk, carrying weapon over and over, and yes as an owner of the house, I consider it a threat and will monitor and would even send out my maid to "check". If it is a non-threat activity, then no action is needed. If bystander is just passing by the sidewalk, then nothing would happen. Although, that bystander should, as a courtesy and showing responsibility, to give early indication of their activity, just so the house owner does not need to feel uneasy.

And once again, an ADIZ is an IDENTIFICATION zone. No where did we said it is territorial airspace and that freedom of movement is block, so again you need to examine your brain.
 
.
What a joke. Because it is a "No rule within rules" that each foreign planes should, not MUST, cooperate as a courtesy to safeguard security and maintain flight order to prevent miscalculation. You need to shut your mouth as no where did we mention that it is territorial airspace and we never halt or even attempt to block any movement of aircraft in the zone. All we did is monitor and send aircraft to check which is the international norm dealing with the same scenario.

Your analogy is a joke. If someone continues to walk on my sidewalk, carrying weapon over and over, and yes as an owner of the house, I consider it a threat and will monitor and would even send out my maid to "check". If it is a non-threat activity, then no action is needed. If bystander is just passing by the sidewalk, then nothing would happen. Although, that bystander should, as a courtesy and showing responsibility, to give early indication of their activity, just so the house owner does not need to feel uneasy.

And once again, an ADIZ is an IDENTIFICATION zone. No where did we said it is territorial airspace and that freedom of movement is block, so again you need to examine your brain.
When China demanded filed flight plans REGARDLESS of intent, so yes, China is treating that international airspace as territorial airspace. Do you know the context of the word 'as' here? It mean equal to.

Do you want to see your government's rules again?

Announcement of the Aircraft Identification Rules for the East China Sea Air Defense Identification Zone of the P.R.C.

So it is YOU who should shut YOUR mouth. You got the entire aviation community -- pilots, attorneys, military, civilians -- on the alert but we should listen to a bunch of Internet rank amateurs -- you guys -- who probably never touched an aircraft on what this mean to them and who makes a living flying?
 
.
I remember one noob fighter jet pilot crashed into this aircraft and died.seriously,PLAAF should train its pilots properly.what is this???that fighter was sent for escorting,not to perform Kamikaze...

I think thats the aircraft...

800px-KampfflugzeugF-8China-2009-01-04.jpg



and name of the pilot was Lt. Cdr. Wang

Before calling the pilot a noob, you should look closer at home where you Indian noobs blew up the whole submarine recently, turning every crew member inside the sub into BBQ.
 
.
Before calling the pilot a noob, you should look closer at home where you Indian noobs blew up the whole submarine recently, turning every crew member inside the sub into BBQ.

accidents happen.nobody can blow a missile without proper key,even if the want to.so,something major problem happened to Indian Sub.even Chinese Subs got blown up several times.I didn't bring that,did I??but crashing into an aircraft it was sent to escort is completely different issue,aint it??you're comparing a car malfunction with crashing a car into some wall.
 
.
accidents happen.nobody can blow a missile without proper key,even if the want to.so,something major problem happened to Indian Sub.even Chinese Subs got blown up several times.I didn't bring that,did I??but crashing into an aircraft it was sent to escort is completely different issue,aint it??you're comparing a car malfunction with crashing a car into some wall.

That is a strange comparison, you are making an excuse for the incompetent crew for blowing up the sub. Do you actually know what even happened, what caused the explosion? If you claim it's an accident, then drivers having a car crashes can also called accidents.
Who said the Chinese pilot crashed into the American plane? It might as well that plane accidently hit the Chinese fighter plane.
My point is you don't know what happened up in the air and inside the sub, so calling the pilot a noob is baseless.
Plus you said many Chinese subs got blown up, care to show us news articles here and not just making stories up????
 
.
I just read up on that Chinesewand guy, what an utter idiot, and he lost his life for it too.

Funny the CCP made the bot chinese believe hes some sorta hero, whereas he was just an under qualified idiot.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom