150 JF-17s?!!!!! That would be overkill. If that were to happen, UK will not be able to retake the islands in 30 years.
20-40 will be sufficient, the AAF pilots are well trained already. But yes they will need some flying hours on the JF-17 (or any other plane) to acclimatize to it.
lol 20-40 JF-17 is enough for combine SEA/AIR/LAND SAM defence net?? lol Who is not being realistic here?? A combination of type 45, Type 22 and later Type 26 with Land base SAM system, you sure 20 or even 40 JF-17 is enough??
What was your rank in the military? Were you an NCO? You are not fooling anyone with jargon.
What you are saying makes no sense. It will be as if i said, if you had to drive to point B with 100 vehicles, it will be very hard. You will need to keep the vehicles in lane, more than 3 vehicles cannot be at the same point in the lane, you will need to stop at red light, be careful not to run over any pedestrians. Does a driver think all of that before doing this? Are you kidding me? It is second nature.
I was a Captain of the US Army, and I am a private Pilot. The first thing you get it wrong is when you compare flying to driving.
Anyone enter an direct approach to any single given AO are designed to stack at certain level to avoid collision. When you are driving you only need to take care of the horizontal plane traffic, but if you are flying, the traffic is coming in from 3D. And yes, in civil aviation, EACH LANE RESERVE FOR 1 AIRCRAFT AT A TIME ONLY. you can have another one trailing, so 1 inbound, 1 outbound for each flight level.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holding_(aeronautics)
I don't know how you do it in Pakistan, maybe you all flew crazy, I don't care, but this is how the west would have done.
Good job tilting the numbers. There are 100 infantry men in falklands. That's it. The garrison is of 1200 but that doesn't mean anything. In 1982 the Arg forces were ordered not to kill any marines, and they were able to achieve that. The Island surrendered in 3 hours. The same will happen this time. There is just a small network of Rapier missiles, and the 3 fighters, that is all. Once they fall, the islands are gone. UK does not have the 2 carriers that were crucial back then. Once the islands are lost, it will be impossible for Britain to take them back. Unless you want to believe the fantasy that 1 Brit kills 1000. I am not saying the stationed forces won't fight back, i am just saying it will be impossible for them to put up much of a fight unless they are super soldiers.
I don't know where you get the 100 men figure. Even the stupid Falkland defence force have 250 men according to Wikipedia. Falkland have a Permanent Royal Marine garrison of 1500 men, with 1 Battalion (900+ men) of British infantry rotating in and out of Falkland every year, that's nearly 2,500, with on ground RN and RAF personnel and the Falkland defence force and police, the figure is close to 3700, now that UK have withdrew from Afghanistan and promise to reinforce the tenant unit to 2 battalions This will bump the island defender to about 5000.
No where near the 100 men walk over as you say, may I ask, where do you get that number?? I got mine here
Defence chiefs prepare new plans to defend Falkland Islands - Telegraph
Just because you said it's 100 men, does not mean there are only 100 defender in Falklands....
