It is you who is living in a cave..This is what india did in maldives
1988 Maldives Coup - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is called helping a friend in need..And about pakistan having better relationship with pakistan, Where was pakistan when there was a military coupe in maldives?It was only us who were there to help them..
Some threads about maldives here in this forum-
http://www.defence.pk/forums/strate...ouths-waging-jihad-pak-seeks-indias-help.html
http://www.defence.pk/forums/india-...nt-nasheed-meets-indian-chief-army-staff.html
http://www.defence.pk/forums/india-defence/41054-india-building-radar-network-maldives.html
So much for the better relationship of pakistan to maldives!!
It is because of the friendship between india and nepal that we can cross each others border without even a passport..our currency is accepted there and a lot of napali gurkhas are still recruited to indian army.The word
maoists itself shows whose allegience they have..
What a bs!we provide visa free access to bhutanis,many bhutani business are tax free..and any attack on bhutan by any other nation is considered an attack on india,the reason they dont have any army.
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/42397-we-owe-india-bhutan-king.html.
A typical pathetic reply characteristic of a bharti, Maldives hate bharti because they are occupying their islands, The terrorist organistaion RAW has been unable to occupy muslim state of Maldives ever since thieir failed coupe in 80's this tactic was used earlier in 1975 where they were successfull.
RAW has been trying hard to occupy nepal, bangladesh, Bhutan and maldives, Sri Lanka like previously bharat illegally about 565 princely states in 1947 but it has failed miserably,
The 1950 treaty which allows free movement of people and goods between bharat and nepal was signed only to decrease chinese influence who were supporting the communist Party of nepal and sponsoring a communist revolution to overthrow the state. Nepali population was very much against this treaty, Nepalis know its a trick by bharat to slowly occupy the country, Nepal protested to bharat when it illegaly occupied Sikkim and it knows all the bharti plans of gobbling up all the smaller state,
No need to thump your chest, Maoists are going to scrap 1950 Indo-Nepal treaty read this
Maoists to scrap 1950 Indo-Nepal treaty, Maoists want remove any bharati influence fron nepal.
About bhutan, it is slowly being democratised, bharat cleverly also signed a treaty with bhutan to spread its tentacles, But bhutan will soon dump bharat and instead choose more powerful and richer china, Bharat's obligation under the treaty is not to interfere in Bhutan's domestic affairs. The kingdom has policy of isolation and this is changing. Bhutan is voting in favor of China in almost every major forums and against bhartis, Just because bhutan is landlocked and surrounded by India on three sides makes it dependent on bharat for access to the sea.
Bhutan knows bhrat supports insurgent groups in northeast, India is playing a double game to bring popular revolt against King Wangchuck somewhere in the next decade. This cannot be achieved unless the minds of Bhutanese are brainwashed with the help of IT. Indian has hegemonic ambitions in the region and Bhutan is an easy prey. India’s main objective seems to create greater India by placing Bhutan under loose confederation under Indian union. One wonders that the agreement in hydropower generation is New Delhi’s tool to enter Bhutan and win the hearts of masses. India believes that since Bhutan is surrounded by India on three sides and is dependent on India for access to the sea so it should be part of India. Although Bhutan shares borders with China but India claims that a pro-China policy is not viable for Bhutan.
We have an example of Sri Lanka before us when Indian Armed Forces physically occupied Sri Lanka in 1986 in the name of helping Colombo to get rid of insurgents.
Again bharati army occupied maldives in the name of fighting insurgent but maldives army knew their plan they failed
Bharti occupied sikkim using the same tactic of fighting rebels which were infact raw terrorists
Do you want me to post comments of afghan rulers regarding pakistan?Oh if you want civilian openion,go to any afghani forums and ask about pakistan..
50000 men are crossing because pakistan have no effective control in that areas.
Yes i want you to post the the comment of afghan ruler, You bhartis love to talk about afghan hating pakistan while you people are abhorred by afghans thousand times more than pakistanis, Why should i go to afghan forums to know their nature, there are 5 million afghans in pakistan, i have studied in a muslim school where 80% of school children were afghans, i dont need to learn anything from a south bharti how they feel about us,
bharti, this is what i learned from my experience with afghans friend, about 90% afghans are propakistani and have homes in pakistan, the only reason few people who hate punjabis are those who were born outside pakistan and or whose family members were killed by taliban, Another thing they hate punjabis because of sikhs, sikhs ocupied peshawar valley and they think it were punjabis, I have seen punjabis on pushtun forums and i havent seen punjabis being abused, Pushtun forums are full of bharti posing as pushtun
300000 bengalis who were killed were mostly muslims,not hindus..So were the 10 million migrants..what a great deed to take pride of!.Yes it is a fact that 90000 pakistanis shamelessly surrendered to indian forces.And you bring muslim invation as something to take pride of!!
You and i are of races which were invaded by them..And yet you shamelessly take pride in killing and looting of your own ancestors by invading forces(just because some of your ancestors converted to religion of invaders)your own words in another post-"
My ancestors were rajputs and i am ashamed of my ancestry and i dont call myself rajput" No wonder 90000 of your soldiers surrendered without a fight..
It was you who unnecessarily brought india to this discussion..Now lets get back to topic..
90,000? the number of soldiers were 34,000
Sarmila Bose who is an american of bharati descent writes they were 34,000 pakistan army soldier,
Sarmila Bose describes the events on 1971 | Daily Mail Post
By the way i am not rajput, i just wrote i was rajput to the other person so that he could prove me my ancestors were hindus but he couldn't
Finally the rajputs of bhart are not the original rajput they were orginally the dark skinned people who were ruled by pakistani rajput, then these rajput slaves after few centuries started calling themselves rajputs, The only rajputs are the descendents of hephthalite who settled in indus valley, Rajputs are supposed to resemble central asians but bharati rajput resemble south indians which proves that bharati wannabe rajputs were actually slaves of white skinned pakistani rajput,
The pakistani rajput were Jinnah, bhuuto, riaz khokhar they more look like central asians so they were the original rajputs,
About my ancestry, you dont have to worry about it, my ancestors are not indigenous to pakistani land they also came as invader
I am expecting another pathetic reply in which you will desperately try to prove how nepali and bhutani love bhartis and afghani hate pakistani,
This is all due to your thousand year slavery to muslim and you still have this slave mentality 
