China about to replace US as strongest naval power and Washington is too late to stop it

[IblinI]

You are like a 10y kid.
You forget any attack on the US by China will draw all 28 Nato states into the war. Pls do the forum a favor, count all ships of 29 countries and say the number here! Pls don‘t forget the ships of other US alliance partners from Japan, Korea to Australia!

People can imagine how many ships all of those industrialized nations can build in a year. Ok certainly you chinese can build too. Have fun.

If he is 10 years old, you are 3, despite your bullshit theory, who is talking about war here?
A war between China and US is not mud throwing game that you just played on street. You should shut your mouth.

 

[riscol]

That just shows how detrimental dog food can be to the Vietnamese. The article is focusing on the naval buildup and someone here is pointing out of launching an attack on US soil. And he is supposedly educated in Germany? Since when is Germany breeding this kind of low level workforce to society?

 

[Viet]

If he is 10 years old, you are 3, despite your bullshit theory, who is talking about war here?
A war between China and US is not mud throwing game that you just played on street. You should shut your mouth.

First, you are welknown for coward attacks. See the attacks on Vietnam!

Second, communist China under Mao wanted to start WW III.

 

[IblinI]

First, you are welknown for coward attacks. See the attacks on Vietnam!

Second, communist China under Mao wanted to start WW III.

Again I have overestimated you and your age, now you look like a two years old baby, It is your US master who is dropping bombs at this moment.

 

[mb444]

Dude, as if no one else knows they have 11 carriers, you can always say they could increase their infrastructure, but in reality things are not that easy, they have being in the process of deindustrialization for decades, take a look at Detroit and those blue collars who voted for Trump as an example.

US companies have moved their industry abroad to reduce cost and maximise profit leading to pockets of deindustrialisation.

However that does not mean US economy is weaker in any way.

US military industrial complex is very much alive and kicking. It can go up several gears very easily. US have been in continious conflict since WW2 around the world as well as carrying NATO.

Furthermore is it really teanable to believe that US will not take measures to ensure qualititive edge is maintained against potential adversaries.

 

[艹艹艹]

And no, China is not overtaking the US Navy. The US Navy can project power anywhere on the planet and sustain operations for years. China can’t do that. US Naval superiority is clear, and will remain so as it modernizes over the next decade.

You r right
To maintain global hegemony, the US Navy must have the most powerful navy in the world
The US navy can drop bombs anywhere in the world

 

[Mista]

You r right
To maintain global hegemony, the US Navy must have the most powerful navy in the world
The US navy can drop bombs anywhere in the world

战忽？

 

[Foxtrot Delta]

加油！！

 

[Viet]

Again I have overestimated you and your age, now you look like a two years old baby, It is your US master who is dropping bombs at this moment.

Mao wanted to escalate the war to a nuclear exchange which was rejected by USSR and Vietnam. That is a fact. Most chinese warmongers are of low IQ.

 

[XTQ1999]

Dude, as if no one else knows they have 11 carriers, you can always say they could increase their infrastructure, but in reality things are not that easy, they have being in the process of deindustrialization for decades, take a look at Detroit and those blue collars who voted for Trump as an example.

if a "deindustrialized" US manages to produce the most complicated ships in the world, 2nd biggest automotive producer, biggest and most advanced space power and biggest aviation producer, then I would hate to see what a "industrialized" US looks like.

 

[antonius123]

if a "deindustrialized" US manages to produce the most complicated ships in the world, 2nd biggest automotive producer, biggest and most advanced space power and biggest aviation producer, then I would hate to see what a "industrialized" US looks like.

You have seen how the industrialized US manage to produce complicated ship and military stuff. Now you will be seing how the deindustrialized US is loosing that might capability.

 

[ZeEa5KPul]

"About to" is a bit much. Give it 20 years or so. In the meantime, it doesn't matter how many carriers the US has when China has ballistic missiles that can turn them into coral reefs from 4000 km away.

 

[j20blackdragon]

You don't necessarily need a large navy in order to be successful. Earlier this year, Iran used four small boats and a helicopter to seize the British-flagged tanker Stena Impero. Iranian commandos rappelled on board from the helicopter. Highly effective. Large navy not needed.

If Iran can do something like that, I can only imagine what China can do.

 

[IblinI]

if a "deindustrialized" US manages to produce the most complicated ships in the world, 2nd biggest automotive producer, biggest and most advanced space power and biggest aviation producer, then I would hate to see what a "industrialized" US looks like.

Advanced or not is out of the concernced of those blue collars, hope you understand the difference.

 

[UKBengali]

LOL.

Which idiot wrote this article?