First, a full scale attack by U.S. against Pakistan is unlikely to happen. Otherwise, WWIII will be very likely to just start.
As for China's involvement, you seem to doubt China's will throughout. If China is really as what you have expected, China's involvement in Korea, Vietnam, direct conflict with India, U.S. and U.S.S.R. is just really inconceivable. As far as who is juvenile, let history decide.
As for the weapons from China, well, it is very simple: quality and quantity. I believe China can make improvement on both during war time for those on the way to Pakistan.
As for China's involvement, you seem to doubt China's will throughout. If China is really as what you have expected, China's involvement in Korea, Vietnam, direct conflict with India, U.S. and U.S.S.R. is just really inconceivable. As far as who is juvenile, let history decide.
As for the weapons from China, well, it is very simple: quality and quantity. I believe China can make improvement on both during war time for those on the way to Pakistan.
Conservative in what way...man??? How hard is this question to understand...China has been giving military help to Pakistan from decades....what does being conservative means here??? Are you saying China is depriving Pak of leathal weapons and now will open gates to them??? If yes then what weapons are you pointing to???
And this will remain the same status quo...If you think otherwise then i am sorry but your reading about geo-politics is a bit juvenile...
You are all over the place here...However let me make it myself more apparent here...Pakistan had enough weapons in her arsenal to retaliate against this attack...They need no chinese support for it but political will....However no chinese support can help them sustain a full-fledge American onslaught...Like it or not but both the statements are correct...