Can india ever get Pakistan controlled Kashmir back????

[relativiti]

That is now..but that does not change the fact..that it was infact Hindus were the original inhabitants of this land and Muslims were the invaders here ..then they talk about how Hindus are hungry for land.

exactly......some medieval islamic invaders ruined everything and looted everything

 

[Secret Service]

Lets leave God out of this cat fight .....suggest some measure India should take to instigate pakistani kashmir back to india..

i think Pakistan should take Indian occupied Kashmir back ....

 

[ares]

anything against India are conspiracy theories ....

Offcourse it is, unless you or your govt can provide evidence to back up your claim.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

That is now..but that does not change the fact..that it was infact Hindus were the original inhabitants of this land and Muslims were the invaders here ..then they talk about how Hindus are hungry for land.

You seem to want 'to purify' these lands because you believe it was the lost legacy of your Hindu ancestors.

Even Central Asia was Buddhism and Confucianism before Islam, even now Xinjiang belongs to China, but it still remains largely Islamic.

 

[relativiti]

You seem to want 'to purify' these lands because you believe it was the lost legacy of your Hindu ancestors.

Can't do it now or in future...will have to live with what we have in the present....else we won't be getting another APJ Abdul Kalam!!

 

[Yeti]

Lets leave God out of this cat fight .....suggest some measure India should take to instigate pakistani kashmir back to india..

Well brother there are ways we can get Kashmir back for one thing you know we control the water into Pakistan we are building many dams in Kashmir for a reason.The main way we can get it back is to give Kashmiris jobs, education and a better life then Pak held kashmiri people will see how life in our side and will wont to join India already many people are giving up arms in Pak held land and moving to our side on the LOC.

 

[Secret Service]

Offcourse it is, unless you or your govt can provide evidence to back up your claim.

yeah we surely provide evidence in your red corridor ...

 

[ares]

You seem to want 'to purify' these lands because you believe it was the lost legacy of your Hindu ancestors.

Pls do show ..where I said that or even tangentially meant it..or are you deriving your own conclusions based on your limited knowledge of this topic.

 

[TheStrantrunCurve]

Well Hindus controlled the entire South Asia previously.. after all Hindus were not an invading army..they were the original inhabitants of this land.
Conspiracy theories!!..got proof??

You hindus have been fooled and you still don’t realise it. History of South Asia has been manufactured by the British. The story of a glorious Hindu past has been concocted by James Princep who came up with the fantastic tale of a composite figure who had never been mentioned by South Asian or Greek historian who were residents of the area. The name “Asoka” was created to put a moniker on a composite figure.

Top Indian historian Romilla Thapar destroys all the myths associated with the nonsense of the so called Golden Age of Hinduism. Gone are the controversial 150 year Mauryas (whose history is as ambiguous as that of Sindhbad and the tooth Fairy), The 300 year so called mystery of the Guptas (never proven), the 200 year fabrication of the Chalukyas, The Rashtrakutas, The Cholas and Pandyas and the The Vijayanagar Empire. Romila Thapar’s has written reams against the so called “Golden age” theory .

The current crop of Hindu jingoism stems from this false version history which was imposed on Bharat in 2003.

The New York Times reported on the topic of Manufctured history of India in a fascinating artice written by Kai Friese. He says “India’s Hindu nationalists have long had a quarrel with history. They are unhappy with the notion that the most ancient texts of Hinduism are associated with the arrival of the Vedic ”Aryan” peoples from the Northwest. They don’t like the dates of 1500 to 1000 B.C. ascribed by historians to the advent of the Vedic peoples, the forebears of Hinduism, or the idea that the Indus Valley civilization predates Vedic civilization. And they certainly can’t stand the implication that Hinduism, like the other religious traditions of India, evolved through a mingling of cultures and peoples from different lands”.

The Supreme Court of Bharat has ruled that Hindus were not the original inhabitants of Bharat–the Bhils were.
According to the Supreme Court “The Bhils are probably the descendants of some of the original inhabitants of India known as the ‘aborigines’ or Scheduled Tribes (Adivasis), who now comprise only about eight per cent of the population of India.

Hindus were not original inhabitants of India|Today's Views

 

[ares]

yeah we surely provide evidence in your red corridor ...

Then you have nothing to complain.

 

[ares]

You hindus have been fooled and you still don’t realise it. History of South Asia has been manufactured by the British. The story of a glorious Hindu past has been concocted by James Princep who came up with the fantastic tale of a composite figure who had never been mentioned by South Asian or Greek historian who were residents of the area. The name “Asoka” was created to put a moniker on a composite figure.

Top Indian historian Romilla Thapar destroys all the myths associated with the nonsense of the so called Golden Age of Hinduism. Gone are the controversial 150 year Mauryas (whose history is as ambiguous as that of Sindhbad and the tooth Fairy), The 300 year so called mystery of the Guptas (never proven), the 200 year fabrication of the Chalukyas, The Rashtrakutas, The Cholas and Pandyas and the The Vijayanagar Empire. Romila Thapar’s has written reams against the so called “Golden age” theory .

The current crop of Hindu jingoism stems from this false version history which was imposed on Bharat in 2003.

The New York Times reported on the topic of Manufctured history of India in a fascinating artice written by Kai Friese. He says “India’s Hindu nationalists have long had a quarrel with history. They are unhappy with the notion that the most ancient texts of Hinduism are associated with the arrival of the Vedic ”Aryan” peoples from the Northwest. They don’t like the dates of 1500 to 1000 B.C. ascribed by historians to the advent of the Vedic peoples, the forebears of Hinduism, or the idea that the Indus Valley civilization predates Vedic civilization. And they certainly can’t stand the implication that Hinduism, like the other religious traditions of India, evolved through a mingling of cultures and peoples from different lands”.

The Supreme Court of Bharat has ruled that Hindus were not the original inhabitants of Bharat–the Bhils were.

According to the Supreme Court “The Bhils are probably the descendants of some of the original inhabitants of India known as the ‘aborigines’ or Scheduled Tribes (Adivasis), who now comprise only about eight per cent of the population of India.

Hindus were not original inhabitants of India|Today's Views

You guys are seriously too much.
after all it was all from tremendous research by Dr. Jamil Khan ..you are already inventing alternate history to suit your ego.

 

[Yeti]

i see purearyan is back with talking out his backside again now he changed his ID to thestrantruncurve wt a joke

 

[relativiti]

You hindus have been fooled and you still don’t realise it. History of South Asia has been manufactured by the British. The story of a glorious Hindu past has been concocted by James Princep who came up with the fantastic tale of a composite figure who had never been mentioned by South Asian or Greek historian who were residents of the area. The name “Asoka” was created to put a moniker on a composite figure.

Top Indian historian Romilla Thapar destroys all the myths associated with the nonsense of the so called Golden Age of Hinduism. Gone are the controversial 150 year Mauryas (whose history is as ambiguous as that of Sindhbad and the tooth Fairy), The 300 year so called mystery of the Guptas (never proven), the 200 year fabrication of the Chalukyas, The Rashtrakutas, The Cholas and Pandyas and the The Vijayanagar Empire. Romila Thapar’s has written reams against the so called “Golden age” theory .

The current crop of Hindu jingoism stems from this false version history which was imposed on Bharat in 2003.

The New York Times reported on the topic of Manufctured history of India in a fascinating artice written by Kai Friese. He says “India’s Hindu nationalists have long had a quarrel with history. They are unhappy with the notion that the most ancient texts of Hinduism are associated with the arrival of the Vedic ”Aryan” peoples from the Northwest. They don’t like the dates of 1500 to 1000 B.C. ascribed by historians to the advent of the Vedic peoples, the forebears of Hinduism, or the idea that the Indus Valley civilization predates Vedic civilization. And they certainly can’t stand the implication that Hinduism, like the other religious traditions of India, evolved through a mingling of cultures and peoples from different lands”.

The Supreme Court of Bharat has ruled that Hindus were not the original inhabitants of Bharat–the Bhils were.
According to the Supreme Court “The Bhils are probably the descendants of some of the original inhabitants of India known as the ‘aborigines’ or Scheduled Tribes (Adivasis), who now comprise only about eight per cent of the population of India.

Hindus were not original inhabitants of India|Today's Views

So what people come up with various bizarre research topics..... some true some false.... you can't go back to 10000 BC or so to prove the present....The fact that India was original land of Hindus is no makeup.......we have loads of relics and pre-historic evidences that prove original inhabitants practiced Hinduism....ever heard about Dravidians?? Ever visited India......people think since Taj mahal is made by a muslim India is a muslim origin country....please visit south india you will come to know

why do you have more confidence on NYT than what we are saying after all we know our origins better

 

[Secret Service]

So what people come up with various bizarre research topics..... some true some false.... you can't go back to 10000 BC or so to prove the present....The fact that India was original land of Hindus is no makeup.......we have loads of relics and pre-historic evidences that prove original inhabitants practiced Hinduism....ever heard about Dravidians?? Ever visited India......people think since Taj mahal is made by a muslim India is a muslim origin country....please visit south india you will come to know

why do you have more confidence on NYT than what we are saying after all we know our origins better

India was land of hindus and remains the land of hindus...But you cant claim on any part of Pakistan.

 

[ares]

India was land of hindus and remains the land of hindus...But you cant claim on any part of Pakistan.

Well present day Pakistan was too ..but it was invaded by Muslims invader and its original inhabitants converted..so don't call Hindus as expansionary invaders..etc.