What's new

Can India become a superpower?! CAN INDIA BECOME A SUPERPOWER?!!

lol written by a commie

Praful was a well known face of left intellectual tradition in Indian media.[5] Analysis of gradual erosion of left in Indian politics was the subject of his deep study.[6][7] He himself had taken part in various left-leaning regional movements in the past and was in long term association with them even after.[8] The last book that he authored just a few months before his death was regarding the possibilities of the revival of Indian left politics.[9] He was incredibly anti-communal and championed civil liberty and secularism.[10] Bidwai had been a Professorial Fellow at the Centre for Social Development, New Delhi, and also a Senior Fellow at the Nehru Memorial Museum and Library.


here's the best part:
He died by choking on food on June 23, 2015[3] while attending a conference in Amsterdam.

bhuka greedy commie:omghaha:

rest in piss

I know. He was totally against nuclear power too.
 
.
Many democracies have no problems with land acquisition. Here in the U.S., the eminent domain laws give the government the power to take away private land for infrastructure and commercial development. Other developed democracies have similar laws as well. You can't justify India's inability to pass a basic land acquisition law on her democratic system.

Well the land bill has not been passed because opposition parties feel differently on some of the clauses - thats democracy. China did not experience such issues - I am adding the China bit because that was your primary question.

No two nations are the same, some democracies do have problems in land acquisition.
 
.
Many democracies have no problems with land acquisition. Here in the U.S., the eminent domain laws give the government the power to take away private land for infrastructure and commercial development. Other developed democracies have similar laws as well. You can't justify India's inability to pass a basic land acquisition law on her democratic system.

In US both parties are sponsored/controlled by the capitalists. In India, only BJP is backed by capitalists. Socialist and communist parties have a different vote base. Once all parties get under the grips of the capitalist forces, India would resemble other countries.

lol written by a commie

Praful was a well known face of left intellectual tradition in Indian media.[5] Analysis of gradual erosion of left in Indian politics was the subject of his deep study.[6][7] He himself had taken part in various left-leaning regional movements in the past and was in long term association with them even after.[8] The last book that he authored just a few months before his death was regarding the possibilities of the revival of Indian left politics.[9] He was incredibly anti-communal and championed civil liberty and secularism.[10] Bidwai had been a Professorial Fellow at the Centre for Social Development, New Delhi, and also a Senior Fellow at the Nehru Memorial Museum and Library.


here's the best part:
He died by choking on food on June 23, 2015[3] while attending a conference in Amsterdam.

bhuka greedy commie:omghaha:

rest in piss

For some reason, every time I read @Joe Shearer , I recall Paful Bidwai.
 
.
Watch this incredibly eye-opening documentary on what it takes to become a superpower. Can India do it? Looking at the massive and awe-inspiring efforts required to develop economically and technically, it makes India's beef ban and communal conflicts look so petty and silly.



My question to fellow Indian posters is this: does India have the potential and focus to match? What does it take to make India develop on a similar scale? Can Narendra Modi deliver?

Few question first :-

1. What is Super Power -- Economical or Military Super Power and what makes you believe India want to become Military Super Power.

2. Why should India copy Chinese way or any other way, other than what our Decission makers decides to follow, and with the democratic government, every one have to satisfied while working, its 1000 times difficult to do the job done, unlike the communist government where, the center have the supreme power in hand.

3. Why asking for one man Narendra Modi to deliver, when its the responsibility of all the Indian Citizen to provide its contribution and follow his/her role.

Question - Does India have capability to become Economically stronger and Military Stronger in the world ?
ans - Definately, India have full potential, talent and resources to achieve it. But the video uploaded and then asking whether India can do that is plain and simple Bull Shit. We have our priority, our own blue print and our own problems to face, different than the other country. Question comes to Narendra Modi, this PM is doing his role rather better and beautifully and the time spend after coming to the power is not much to decide what are his achievements, but lets check his few of his plans and policy :-

1. Digital India --- Major program, to boost the development and provide the benifits and awareness in the country. With very high number of smartphones in the hands of Indians, the government policies and plans could reach the common man hand in much faster way. With digitalization does not mean to provide the Facebook, twitter to the common people and to the remote areas, but rather, control the procedure e.g Tenders to reduce the corruptions, with online banking, education, and even the expert advice on the phones of the farmers the benifits reached to everyone and make them more aware.

2. Skill Development -- This is not the BJP plan rather its more than 22 year old program started by Congress, but if we check its achievement, the Skill development ministry in my city Agra, u.p have trained around 1500 skilled persons in last 22 years with various govenment programs such as CNC, Shoes design, CAD/CAM. The certificate issued helps in getting the loans from various banks for starting the buisness, thus helping in providing the jobs. Great Plan but very flawed why, its only used for getting the loans by well established buisnessman not the common people, because, the limited seats for the enrollment wants bribes, then the bank paperwork to get the loan is complicated, just giving the role of the middle person called DALAL.

Lets take an example of AGRA which is not only the place for TajMahal, but also a hub for the Shoe Industry and Peetha Industry. The Labour working in the Local Shoe factory might be getting 8000/- rupees salary. Now if the international company like Woodland what to open a Unit in Agra, which will provide the jobs for 30,000 labours, would require skilled labour in large number. No doubt the Labour working in the local shoe factory is highly skilled with 15 years of experience on the machine, but he is uneducated, don't have any certificate, or the certificate which International Woodland Company don't recognised. When they ask the government whether they have the skilled labor, the government don't have any data of the required labor, because they have only have produced just 1500 skilled labor till date.
What N. Modi plan is, he took the help of 150 NGO's who will work with the various government agencies to provide training and then certified them, which will be internationally recognized for more than 1500 skills including farming. With this, the government could get all the data, fully linked with the ADHAR CARD (Unique Identification Number), so that now Woodland, could browse the data from the official site, and directly called the labor required, and now have to provide the salary, which would be around 20,000/- + Medical + Insurance + Bus service. The Local Shoe Factory are now forced to increase the salary, and provide the benefit for the labor if they want to operate now. Thus the benefit is to the people, which help in not only providing better living standard, but also the government benifit now reaching the people properly.

Now you can make why various politicians and the Political parties will oppose such moves, it is because, these local shoe factory provide large amount of funds during the elections to the various parties, inclucing BJP itself.

3. Opening Bank Account - Congress and other parties may be making fun of the Modi, that what benifits the ordinary man gets with the opening of the zero balance Bank Account, or whether how much money, he have transfered to their account, from the black Money he had recovered, but either they are IDIOTS, Morons or fools or think that every one is fool. This should have been done way too earlier. The government benifit could not reach the ordinary man in case of the country like India, without direct fund transfer into his account. Best example is the Scolarships and the gas subsidy provided by the govt. The first one I remember how much government pays for the scolarships to the various schools for the distribution of the money to the students..Thousands of fake Schools propogated and made just to juice such money, in just one city. Schools registered with only a small building with virtually no student at all are getting the scholarships of 1000 students with Millions of rupees. And the schools who have the students takes shares from the scholarship amount. When Indian governement will transfer the amount directly to the students bank account, there will no middle man, and would become very tedious and difficult job, to milk such scheme.

Same with the gas subsidy, the government way paying huge amount in the form of the gas subsidy, and the gas agencies were selling the subsidy gas cylinder to the commercial customer, earning huge black money. With the subsidy, now coming directly to the customer's bank account, the black money ceases.

4.. Keeping Silence in various Dramas You mentioned Beef ban and killing of the muslim due to eating beef. For the first one i.e beef ban, please do some research, and not the propaganda, the banning is not done by central government, rather its the state government who decide, whether it should be banned or not. If you ask me, then it depends on various regions, which should be done e.g Haryana, you find very less meat eaters, and more prominent Hindus population, so the state of Haryana have the right to ban the beef, same it can ban Alcohol in the state.
The second Part specially the dadri, it as the criminal incidence, and shows how a muslim person was killed in and enemity grudge against him, and using the communal voilence to hide the criminal plan of some person. But this incidence would have easily be confined to a single place, if the idiots leaders like SOM Bharti, Osmania don't come to dadri, and make rubbish statement to fuel the communal voilence and difference.

I Like the Modi stance in various Dramas which are being fuelled and tried by various political parties specially Congress, and even didn't hesitate to defame the country's image to keep silence, and keep doing what he want to do. They are desperate to get the political power again, because, of which they again want to use the minority card again, because the leader of the Congress, the famous Rahul Gandhi is not going to do just 1% what Modi is atleast trying.


To answer you so called question is Yes India have the capability to become the Super Power, and you don't have an Idea what we are capable of, and what we can do, but we will do it in our ways.
 
Last edited:
.
Well the land bill has not been passed because opposition parties feel differently on some of the clauses - thats democracy. China did not experience such issues - I am adding the China bit because that was your primary question.

No two nations are the same, some democracies do have problems in land acquisition.


So you are saying India's democracy is inferior and inefficient? Then what can India learn from the U.S., Canada, Norway, France, Germany, Italy, Brazil, and others that have had no problems passing a basic land acquisition legislation many decades if not two hundred years ago?
 
.
So you are saying India's democracy is inferior and inefficient?


Did I say this ? Show me.
Then what can India learn from the U.S., Canada, Norway, France, Germany, Italy, Brazil, and others that have had no problems passing a basic land acquisition legislation many decades if not two hundred years ago?

Why should India have to learn anything from anyone ? Each nation has its own way of doing things.

None of the nations mentioned above are even close to the population that votes in India. The population of some these nations would just be about equal to one state of India so where is the comparison ?
 
. .
2. Skill Development -- This is not the BJP plan rather its more than 22 year old program started by Congress, but if we check its achievement, the Skill development ministry in my city Agra, u.p have trained around 1500 skilled persons in last 22 years with various govenment programs such as CNC, Shoes design, CAD/CAM. The certificate issued helps in getting the loans from various banks for starting the buisness, thus helping in providing the jobs. Great Plan but very flawed why, its only used for getting the loans by well established buisnessman not the common people, because, the limited seats for the enrollment wants bribes, then the bank paperwork to get the loan is complicated, just giving the role of the middle person called DALAL.
22 years?
Yet Indian team did really poorly in 2015 San Paolo World Skill
Skills to rule: East Asia's dominance in 43rd WorldSkills Competition in Brazil
U have to learn to walk before run.
 
. .
Brother our government policy was superb, but the execussion was super duper rock solid performance.
Skill India is of course a superb policy.
Execution can be assured once India has a massive industry base, but now it's too early to say so. Skilled workers are only one proportion of all work force. For a highly populated country like India and China, the first priority is to provide jobs to non-Skilled workers who have poor vocational education. China and India cannot develop like those small industrialised countries like South Korea.
Challenges and potentials: from a worker recruitment advetisment
 
.
Did I say this ? Show me.


Why should India have to learn anything from anyone ? Each nation has its own way of doing things.

None of the nations mentioned above are even close to the population that votes in India. The population of some these nations would just be about equal to one state of India so where is the comparison ?


You have implied through your comments that Indian democracy is inferior and inefficient compared to other democracies that had no problem passing a basic land-acquisition legislation many decades ago.

Furthermore, if India had nothing to learn from others, then how did English become an official language. Where did the Indian railways come from? What about democracy itself? India certainly didn't invent democracy.
 
.
it will be hard for India to be a superpower because of its geopolitical location .... it doesnt have good neighborly relations with in its neighborhood ... whereas US has ... China is such a country with which every1 wants to have good relations and if countries like India, Vietnam, Philippines become hostile to its interest then China invests in them... India cant act like china
 
.
You have implied through your comments that Indian democracy is inferior and inefficient compared to other democracies that had no problem passing a basic land-acquisition legislation many decades ago.

Thats your inference not mine

Furthermore, if India had nothing to learn from others, then how did English become an official language. Where did the Indian railways come from? What about democracy itself? India certainly didn't invent democracy.

Comprehension issues here

English, Railways & democracy were used & practiced even before independence .
 
.
Thats your inference not mine



Comprehension issues here

English, Railways & democracy were used & practiced even before independence .

Technically, that wasn't an inference; it was a logical conclusion based on the predicates you provided and affirmed. Moreover, you have just confirmed yet again that India did learn from others: English, railways, and democracy were all imports.
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom