Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To: jhungary
You think you're smart by playing trick of confusing and converting concepts? you just make yourself a fool.
Let's just stick to Kanji using right, ok? which is what this thread is about.
You claimed "China did not have patent on Chinese as in any other modern language in the world. Hence China did not own the exclusive right to Chinese Language." so I assume you declared Hanzi was not invented by Chinese people hence couldn't be banned for use by Japanese, right?
Later you claimed " The History of Chinese (the language) is based on a script of Indo-Sino-Tibetan", citing Wikipedia resource,
have you ever had a look at the Wikipedia title "Sino-Tibetan languages" and its content? where is your claimed "Indo-", and where is the part of written Chinese based on Indo-Sino-Tibetan script?
You understand the concepts of spoken language and written language at any rate, right? Chinese language belonging to Sino-Tibetan language family only means the languages under this category share some common phonetic characteristics and rules of grammar, but they still are different and independent languages incomprehensible to each other.
Written language is not naturally born at the same time with spoken language, like Hanzi was born 3000 years ago and Kana was created around 500B.C. and they were different even being among the same language family like written Chinese and Tibetan are totally different and of course were created by Chinese and Tibetan respectively.
As for the origin of Hanzi, and the difference between ancient and modern China,
one thing you should always keep in mind is that China is a place mainly populated by aboriginal Han Chinese ever since this vast land first had human beings and till today!
The history of China is mostly the history of Han Chinese, the culture including language history of China is cultural history of Han Chinese, Chinese language whatever ancient Chinese or modern Chinese is all and only referring to Han Chinese language.
China is not Egypt which is divided by ancient and modern Egypt composed of different nationals with different language and culture.
Chinese governments may have changed many times, the reigning size of land may varied accordingly, however, Han Chinese always there,
Chinese language always there unchanged, and of course Han Chinese culture never broken and changed by other cultures.
So desperate!
You just keep lying and inventing history to make yourself comfort?
Indo contributing to the Sino-Tibetian langauge ? you're brainless?
you don't know Indo-European language family is totally different from Sino-Tibetan language family?
since the two language don't share any common phonetic and grammatical characteristics, then where is the indo-influence in Chinese? basic logic!
oh, "indo-sino-tibetan script", how genuine! then written Chinese, Tibetan and Indic were both developed from this script, although they three just don't recognize and share any similarity from each other today!
idiot!
Yes, the whole discuss i made to the fellow chinese member is the Manuscript (Writing System) where most of them refer the New Standard CHinese (Mandarin). What they fail to see is the Modern Standard Chinese is a devirative from the Manuscript in ancient time.
I have seen such characters its look like simple pictures. Didn't China ever have phonetic script.
Chinese civillization was pretty isolated and unique,no point to abandon those unique characters.
LOL, your tiny little brain can't even fill in a basic logical thinking
As I said before, go K yourself, "Chinese teacher".
There is logic thinking of Nan Man, you sated:
"天空" is a word and "空" is a character, these are different !
and late on you stated:
Did I say that "空" is not a word you blind fool? ... .
"天空" = sky; "空" = empty
Don't you know xiongnu(hun)was beaten by han dynasty?Southern hun was removed from mongolia and be placed in china by emperor,northern hun was defeated by han dynasty and xianbei people and some of them run from mongolia to the weakest west.the population of huns who invade europe was only thousands,only 1% of the powerful xiongnu,but they still conquered nearly half of europe.Did China ever face Hun invasion.
But if they modified it enough, they can claim the new design to be theirs.
New Recruit
I have seen such characters its look like simple pictures. Didn't China ever have phonetic script.
New Recruit
Chinese civillization was pretty isolated and unique,no point to abandon those unique characters.
Did China ever face Hun invasion.
While i always maintain the modern Chinese are a product of Old Chinese, China (PRC) today do not hold the right to the Old Chinese and the Kanji are NOT Derived from Modern Chinese (Manarin). Do bear in mind the Modern Chinese (Mandarin) is not the one Japanese Model after when they implement Kanji. Japan Implement Kanji in around 50AD which roughly the time of the usage of Middle Chinese Language.
HA! Stupid Vietnamese loves Chinese language so much it never stop teaching a Chinese its "Vietnamese style Chinese"~Ha!
"天空" is a word but "空" in this situation is a character within in the word "天空", you stupid NanmanVietmonkey,
which means that the word "天空" (sky) is nothing to do with "空" (empty),
just like "熱狗" (hotdog) is nothing to do with "狗" (dog) you freaking idiot.
"空" can be a word, a character or even a sentence in different situation and different ways of using.
I can't believe that I have to describe sth simple as 1+1=2 to a freaking idiot. What a wast of time.
Stupid low IQ (yeah that's what you called me few months ago, and I didn't even say sth bad to you. you are the axxhole who really start the fight and acting like a monkey) NammanViet are too stupid to learn Chinese and dare to become a Chinese teacher, ha!
What, still alive? Jump over the window and end your worthless life, at once.
You are really the stupidest bastard I have ever seen on internet, shame on you low-classed creature.
To: jhungary
You think you're smart by playing trick of confusing and converting concepts? you just make yourself a fool.
Let's just stick to Kanji using right, ok? which is what this thread is about.
You claimed "China did not have patent on Chinese as in any other modern language in the world. Hence China did not own the exclusive right to Chinese Language." so I assume you declared Hanzi was not invented by Chinese people hence couldn't be banned for use by Japanese, right?
Later you claimed " The History of Chinese (the language) is based on a script of Indo-Sino-Tibetan", citing Wikipedia resource,
have you ever had a look at the Wikipedia title "Sino-Tibetan languages" and its content? where is your claimed "Indo-", and where is the part of written Chinese based on Indo-Sino-Tibetan script?
You understand the concepts of spoken language and written language at any rate, right? Chinese language belonging to Sino-Tibetan language family only means the languages under this category share some common phonetic characteristics and rules of grammar, but they still are different and independent languages incomprehensible to each other.
Written language is not naturally born at the same time with spoken language, like Hanzi was born 3000 years ago and Kana was created around 500B.C. and they were different even being among the same language family like written Chinese and Tibetan are totally different and of course were created by Chinese and Tibetan respectively.
As for the origin of Hanzi, and the difference between ancient and modern China,
one thing you should always keep in mind is that China is a place mainly populated by aboriginal Han Chinese ever since this vast land first had human beings and till today!
The history of China is mostly the history of Han Chinese, the culture including language history of China is cultural history of Han Chinese, Chinese language whatever ancient Chinese or modern Chinese is all and only referring to Han Chinese language.
China is not Egypt which is divided by ancient and modern Egypt composed of different nationals with different language and culture.
Chinese governments may have changed many times, the reigning size of land may varied accordingly, however, Han Chinese always there,
Chinese language always there unchanged, and of course Han Chinese culture never broken and changed by other cultures.
So desperate!
You just keep lying and inventing history to make yourself comfort?
Indo contributing to the Sino-Tibetian langauge ? you're brainless?
you don't know Indo-European language family is totally different from Sino-Tibetan language family?
since the two language don't share any common phonetic and grammatical characteristics, then where is the indo-influence in Chinese? basic logic!
oh, "indo-sino-tibetan script", how genuine! then written Chinese, Tibetan and Indic were both developed from this script, although they three just don't recognize and share any similarity from each other today!
idiot!
Epic fail. first you claimed that chinese writing is indo-china-tibetian which it's not belong to chinese along, now you admit it as ancient chinese, then for you ancient chinese is not modern chinese, in this case enlight us what was the differences? and are you realized that Japanese use modern chinese simplfiy writing??
here the link on how japanese use simplify chinese kanji
Top 100 Most Common Kanji - 1 thru 50