Buddhism v Islam in Asia Fears of a new religious strife

[hussain0216]

I'm not a Buddhist. If the first Arabs who conquered Afghanistan and Sindh listened to your advice, Afghanistan and Sindh would be filled with Arab settlers instead of Afghans or Sindhis and other peoples.

Again I'm asking you, what to Buddhists in Laos have do with Burma?

A Buddhist and another pagan from the middle of the amazon rainforest are both non Muslim. So would you go out of your way to kill a pagan from the middle of the amazon rainforest for what happens in Burma? If you wouldn't, then don't bother with the Buddhist in Laos. They both equally have nothing to do with it.

So just to clarify your happy as long as only burmese get attacked

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

I am asking you a question, you Buddhists support this massacre don't you expect retaliation

Wait.... were there no terrorist attacks before the Burma incident?

Who is retaliating against who?

And since you live in the UK, you should know your previous post was illegal under British law. Just hope that no one reading this forum reports you for it.

 

[Developereo]

Would you also advocate the same for Muslim majority countries with minority enclaves? Like say Coptics in Egypt or Maronites in Lebanon?

You're still struggling with the concepts.
No one is advocating independence for "enclaves". The areas in question were separate political entities before colonial rule.

 

[hussain0216]

I asked a question ding bat not make a threat

May be you can't open your eyes wide enough to read

 

[anonymus]

It was only because they were Muslim that they could withstand such punishment

If the bosnians were Hindus they would have surrendered

Now at least they have Bosnia and kosovo

Then why did the mard-e-momin surrendered to grass eating Indians in 1972 without putting up any resistance and why did they surrendered to Christians in Spain.

 

[Developereo]

I am talking of a time period before this treaty.

There were two small sultanates. One was captured by siam kingdom. Another was first captured but later ceded to british and this territory was later returned by british.

Colonialist never added to existing territory of any independent state.

You are right. The northern Malay sultantates, though separate political entities, were effectively under the rule of Siamese kings before the British came around. The British solidified the status quo formally by those treaties without consulting the actual Malay people.

 

[Wholegrain]

So just to clarify your happy as long as only burmese get attacked

This is a bilateral conflict between Burmese and Muslims, so if Burmese get attacked for attacking Muslims then thats their problem. But if you drag any non involved people into this...

I asked a question ding bat not make a threat

May be you can't open your eyes wide enough to read

There are millions of east asian Muslims, very mature of you to engage in racial attacks.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

You target innocent Muslims in Burma then why shouldn't Muslims cut the throat of every buddists they find?

So then, answer your own question.

Why aren't you out there right now doing it? What is your rationale?

 

[Vinod2070]

It was only because they were Muslim that they could withstand such punishment

If the bosnians were Hindus they would have surrendered

Now at least they have Bosnia and kosovo

Well, fact is that it is only the Muslims who are surrendering everywhere and it is the kaffirs who are saving them.

Like you have done reverse hizarat to a kaffir country and now cry "Islamophobia".

But yes, hatred and self loathing makes people crazy so can't really fault you.

 

[Iggy]

It was only because they were Muslim that they could withstand such punishment

If the bosnians were Hindus they would have surrendered

Now at least they have Bosnia and kosovo

He was not talking about what Hindus have done instead of Muslims..

Why are you dodging his questions?? Dont have any answer??

Dont worry, we understand

 

[Developereo]

Since you area talking about South East Asia, How about the Hindu Majapahit Kingdom of Java and Bali which was an independent entity before the Portuguese came to Indonesia? Should they be declared independent according to your logic?

If the Hindus in that state feel that they are being persecuted for their beliefs, then they could make that case.

 

[Roybot]

You're still struggling with the concepts.
No one is advocating independence for "enclaves". The areas in question were separate political entities before colonial rule.

Well in that case what about the Hindu Majapahit Kingdom? You can't just pick and choose when a certain area was under Muslim rule and make your demands based on that.

All the areas of South East Asia were Hindu Kingdoms before the arrival of Islam. So if we have to revert to the past and make demands based on that then why don't we go all the way back. Why do you stop at Islamic kingdoms? There were kingdoms in the region even before Muhammed was born!

Should't Hindus be claiming all of Pakistan, Bangladesh, Kashmir cause once upon a time they were Hindu Kingdoms?

 

[hussain0216]

Then why did the mard-e-momin surrendered to grass eating Indians in 1972 without putting up any resistance and why did they surrendered to Christians in Spain.

War is like that its tough, you win some you lose some, when you're strong you can destroy your enemy if you go through a weak period you take punishment

Yes we lost Spain, but equally Muslim armies marched to within distance of Paris and kept north Africa and many other former Christian lands

Even the crusades were defended against and eventually the crusaders thrown out by force

You win some you lose some

 

[Vinod2070]

There are millions of east asian Muslims, very mature of you to engage in racial attacks.

Wait a minute!

If there were no "millions of east asian Muslims", would the "racial attacks" be justified.

And it is these very people who cry the loudest about "stereotyping" and "typecasting".

 

[Reashot Xigwin]

Bro, Rohingyas has become a problem because Muslims particularly from Pakistan and Bangladesh have inflated it to those proportions.

Funny how the world doesn't react when my community was persecuted in these countries.

Rohingyas want a separate country with Islamic belief in a non-Islamic country.

Tell me how can one tolerate separatism and communal attacks in ones' own land?

Burmese Buddhists were fed up of Islamic bullying there as these people are not open-minded and friendly like Indonesian muslims.

So it has nothing to do about the Myanmar government treating the Rohingya like..... I'm trying to find a nicer word, but "Crap" is more appropriate. Worse still this attack has reached not only to the stateless Rohingya, but to the entire Muslim community in Myanmar. Its no longer about Rohingya even other government approved ethnic muslims is also in danger. Where's the justification for that?

Communal violence in Myanmar: When the lid blows off | The Economist

Wait a minute!

If there were no "millions of east asian Muslims", would the "racial attacks" be justified.

And it is these very people who cry the loudest about "stereotyping" and "typecasting".

Would, could, if. Seriously you're like a child. No one can choose when, where they born or even the religion they were forced on by their parents. If you want to justify racial attack or any kind of attacks then there's something wrong with you.