the news is absolutely true
Fascinating. And you learnt that how, exactly?
The adjective "absolutely" that you employ suggests you must be in possession of some credible, concrete elements to sustain your claim. Hope I will not be disappointed when continuing my reading of your comment.
and every media outlet is reporting it.
1) No, not "every" media outlet is reporting it.
2) Media publications quoting each other is supposed to constitute definitive hard "evidence"?
You're starting to disappoint.
However, Iranian regime has gag order in place and arresting anyone who confirms what is going on the ground. They're afraid Israel is trying to drag them into war.
Produce credible evidence as to the purported "gag order" issued by Iranian authorities.
Produce credible evidence of anyone having been arrested for "confirming" actual events (rather than spinning Kuwait-baby-incubator or Iraq-WMD style, zio-American lies).
If you fail to substantiate these two claims with any sort of empirical data, then one will have to conclude that you are fantasizing. I noticed you appear to issue lots of bizarre claims without caring to back them up. How come? Yet another unintended consequence of life under the US regime in its post-modern, post-truth phase of evolution?
As for the part about Iranian authorities "fearing" that the illegal zionist apartheid entity would "drag them into war", I honestly fail to discern any possible causal link between this gratuitious contention and the previous ones. Actually a non-negligible portion of Iran's population, brainwashed as they are by Persian-language zionist media broadcasrtig from abroad in what is the most comprehensive and massive propaganda campaign bar none to ever target a nation and its government, would actually cheer on if Iranian authorities refrained from involving themselves in war against the zionist apartheid entity, even if attacked. In other terms, the Iranian political system, already enjoying unwavering traditional backing from its ordinary support base, would then achieve to rally behind itself those other Iranians too who fell victim to the endless ocean of foreign-based anti-IRI media and their systematic brainwashing. So from the strict point of view of public perception management, which your argument seemed to be basing itself upon, your inference is logically questionable.
Nope, no fake news, and has nothing to do with Saudi.
Provide evidence of this "not" being fake. As said, media, no matter how numerous, quoting each other won't cut it.
Lame attempt at deflection, stuff is happening on the ground and Iranian regime is censoring it.
Where's you're evidence for that allegation? Evidence, Falcon29, we need evidence for a statement to be taken seriously, you know.
You gonna get in big trouble as an Iranian even tweeting what you heard and saw.
Really? Just where did you get that strange idea from? From an overactive imagination perhaps?
Considering the unbelievable levels of freedom of expression prevailing in Iran, what you state here is extremely improbable. Then again, when there is no shred of evidence to back it up, it is devoid of interest anyway.
But we know that guys who scream about resistance against US and Israel will never do anything when given chance.
Can you be more precise? What type of a hollywoodesque movie is your creative, colorful imagination exactly projecting into your mind here?
If by "doing something" you are generically meaning any and all sorts of acts of resistance, then I will be able to bring some news for you: ever since the Islamic revolution of 1979, Iran and the terrorist US regime have found themselves on opposing sides of a fully fledged, multi dimensional stand off, the history of which is replete not just with obvious measures of hostility and aggression by Washington, but also, evidently, with a stream of Iranian acts of resistance against said aggression. History that stretches back all the way to neutralization of the US den of CIA spies (so-called "embassy") in Tehran, to the US-Iranian naval clashes in the Persian Gulf during Saddam's imposed war on Iran, to Iranian-led creation of resistance groups in Lebanon, to Tehran's backing of Iraqi resistance groups against Bush junior's illegal occupation of Iraq, to the mutual assistance between Iran and various other intrepid nations and non-state actors accross the world engaging in the anti-imperial struggle (the DPRK, Cuba, Venezuela to name just a few), not to mention Iran's acts of resistance in the realm of soft war and in the media, such as offering platforms and organizing conferences for American dissidents, etc.
The same goes, of course, for the zionist apartheid regime.
The list is not just long, it actually filled thousands of books, be they of the academic or the journalistic type, published on the topic over the past four decades. You should go to a library for a change and grab yourself one of those. You'd be shocked at how many new things you'd learn which you missed, apparently.
If US did not claim Solemiane strike they would said it was car bomb that killed him and killed random Iraqis in response.
No, they certainly would not. Mass murdering random Iraqi civilians is a specialty of the US regime, of useful idiot dictators of theirs like Saddam, as well as of zio-American terrorists creations such as ISIS.
Now you guys playing game of denial and keeping quiet trying to wait this out till US election to see if something will change. But it doesn't change facts about what's happening on ground and we don't care what some regime spokesmen on PDF say. It's real news and we are reporting it regardless of how many times you guys call it fake.
You can repeat it a billion times if you feel like wasting your time on such a senseless endeavour. However, it will not alter the fact that absent any concrete evidence shared by you, all you would have done is to utter gratuitious, hollow claims just as you have been doing so far in this thread.
Also, the concept of supposed Iranian "regime spokesmen on PDF" is a hilarious one. To begin with, there is no such thing as a "regime" in Iran, only a legitimate political system. The term "regime" would more appropriately apply to the totalitarian US terror entity. Then, spokesmen of the government of Iran have other pressing responsabilities to cater to, one will certainly not be encountering them on a random interactive internet platform.
Now, if we are to speculate in the absence of concrete evidence, what we will immediately notice looking at past events is that any and all incidents involving explosions in or over residential / populated areas in Iran have so far been documented by photographic or audiovisual material, both from private citizens and journalists, all of which was uploaded to the internet rapidly after the incident. Likewise, witnesses were quick to testify about their experiences online. In many cases this occurred way before authorities issued any statements.
By contrast, what do we have here? Zero photographic evidence, zero audiovisual documentation, neither of the purported explosions nor about its hypothetical aftermath. No particularly significant amonts of written witness testimonies either, if at all. However, we can see numerous denials by ordinary individuals living there and not having heard or seen anything. As well as fake "tweets" with photographs of explosions consecutive to zionist bombings of Gaza falsely presented as havong been taken Iran.
Thus in alll logic, based on the current availability of empirical data at this moment in time, it being fake news ought to be considered more probable than the opposite.
