LeGenD
MODERATOR
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2006
- Messages
- 15,813
- Reaction score
- 162
- Country
- Location
Thanks for the share.I suggest you educate yourself as I value your opinion and you seem to be non bias (generally).
Here is a good article that goes in depth if you like to read it:
https://patarames.blogspot.com/2020/07/3rd-khordad-mythical-missile.html
A few points to consider.
1. A percentage of 'any' modern military aircraft is composed of carbon fiber material. Radar absorbing paint is also applied on each - these significantly vary in terms of quality by the way. These measures are termed "LO treatments." Even 4th generation aircraft such as F-16 and JF-17 Thunder receive "LO treatments."
2. RQ-4 receive "LO treatments", but it is not a true LO design, let alone a true VLO design.
3. Simulations such as those are based on 'assumptions' and cannot be accurate; this is true for all simulations of similar kind and not just Iranian (Russian simulation of F-22A = flop; Australian simulation of F-35A = flop). Only the aircraft's manufacturer can provide correct simulations because it would have 'complete model' to work with, but this kind of information is not for public domain.
Levels of stealth:-
LO treatments (numerous aerial assets including Global Hawk UAV series)
LO design* (F-117A Nighthawk; X-47 series; RQ-170 series)
VLO design (F-22A Raptor; F-35 Lightning II; B-2 Spirit; RQ-180 series)
ELO design (B-21 Raider)
USAF does not consider RQ-4 for "infiltration roles." RQ-4 is a powerful surveillance platform, but not an effective infiltration platform:
"Keep in mind, BAMS-D, like the Global Hawk and the MQ-4C to a degree, has a zero penetration mission. It doesn't fly into contested airspace. It is literally a sitting duck. The only reason it would do so would be if it was off the leash or there was a major navigational malfunction. It is far more likely Iran just shot it out of international airspace as the Pentagon states." - Tyler Rogoway (The Drive)
Secondly; current generation of UAV are not really good at protecting themselves from external threats. The one which was shot down by the 3rd Khordad had its alarm bells ringing in full swing when the missile was approaching it but the UAV could not do much; it was toast. The drone operator was like OH SHIT...
Side note: 3rd Khordad is a potent platform. It is certainly possible that Iranian defensive applications can take cues from each other (networking).
Blogs do contain nuggets of truth in them and can be informative, but some also have the tendency to mislead; you need to study on a much bigger level for a better grasp of aircraft design mechanics and such. Academic publications is a good start.
*Some examples in the following link: https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zo...eriously-missing-unmanned-combat-air-vehicles