What's new

Breaking News! Bangladesh China signed a contract worth $ 1 billion For BAF

Status
Not open for further replies.
I said this many times I don't want to say it again....
IAF doesn't pose bd a threat... their threat is Pakistan and they set their priorities accordingly....
How many fighter sqd based near bd compared to near Pakistan and China? Yeah that's right.....


If someone poses a direct threat to bd it's Myanmar... and we should be prepared accordingly.

Agree. Only airbases near BD on Indian side are mostly geared towards China anyway....they can be re-assigned if needed....but that needs a serious prolonged deteoriation in India - BD relations (like say 10 times worse than BNP level)

I believe Kalaikunda AFS (kharagpur) is probably the only major one that has some assignment towards BD airspace...but that is more from historical inheriting of location rather than response based.
 
.
Forgot alam although he was Pakistani citizen before death he was born in a Bengali family.....



I said this many times I don't want to say it again....
IAF doesn't pose bd a threat... their threat is Pakistan and they set their priorities accordingly....
How many fighter sqd based near bd compared to near Pakistan and China? Yeah that's right.....


If someone poses a direct threat to bd it's Myanmar... and we should be prepared accordingly.


IAF has huge number of asset around BD although they are aimed at china.

We should not underestimate the threat although in all seriousness there is never going to be a conflict between India and BD. It's inconceivable. There is nothing to be gained for either party.
 
.
In shortest terms: Chinese projects lack in transparency. You may never know how good they are in real-time situations unless you have personal experience with latest in Chinese, Russian and American hardware and you are in the position to draw a real comparison.

Hype is the game of business in current times; it generates sales.

While Chinese engineering capabilities have advanced significantly over the course of years, Americans are miles ahead of other states in the matters of Research and Development and developing new technologies. Americans have fielded the most sophisticated and complex (sea, land and space) infrastructure for its defense-related needs in the world. You can take a look, if you have connections and resources to explore it.

Since you are expecting some assessment, here is one: http://warisboring.com/chinas-shoddy-noisy-nuclear-submarines/


http://warisboring.com/chinas-shoddy-noisy-nuclear-submarines/ -

LOL - the original source is an article from 2009(?) that was already predicting the noise levels of the Type-095SSN that had not even been launched.


Now let us compare to the latest news where the just launched Type-093B is as quiet as improved Los Angeles class SSN(still the backbone of the US fleet), and the just about to be put into service Type 95 SSN will be the FIRST submarine in the world to have electric drive. You know that electric drive submarines will be very,very, very quiet now dont you?
 
.
http://warisboring.com/chinas-shoddy-noisy-nuclear-submarines/ -

LOL - the original source is an article from 2009(?) that was already predicting the noise levels of the Type-095SSN that had not even been launched.


Now let us compare to the latest news where the just launched Type-093B is as quiet as improved Los Angeles class SSN(still the backbone of the US fleet), and the just about to be put into service Type 95 SSN will be the FIRST submarine in the world to have electric drive. You know that electric drive submarines will be very,very, very quiet now dont you?
Check following:

http://www.nti.org/analysis/articles/china-submarine-capabilities/
https://alfinnextlevel.wordpress.co...submarines-of-china-india-russia-take-to-sea/
 
.
IAF has huge number of asset around BD although they are aimed at china.

We should not underestimate the threat although in all seriousness there is never going to be a conflict between India and BD. It's inconceivable. There is nothing to be gained for either party.
In conclusion bd doesn't have any threat but if i really have to list a direct threat... only Myanmar to the list but a suitable deterrence no matter the threat perception should be built which will not encourage mis adventures in bd territory by anyone...... whosoever it might be.
 
.
Agree. Only airbases near BD on Indian side are mostly geared towards China anyway....they can be re-assigned if needed....but that needs a serious prolonged deteoriation in India - BD relations (like say 10 times worse than BNP level)

I believe Kalaikunda AFS (kharagpur) is probably the only major one that has some assignment towards BD airspace...but that is more from historical inheriting of location rather than response based.

These aircraft do not need to be "reassigned" against BD lol.

They can be put into action against BD at a moment's notice.
 
.
http://warisboring.com/chinas-shoddy-noisy-nuclear-submarines/ -

LOL - the original source is an article from 2009(?) that was already predicting the noise levels of the Type-095SSN that had not even been launched.


Now let us compare to the latest news where the just launched Type-093B is as quiet as improved Los Angeles class SSN(still the backbone of the US fleet), and the just about to be put into service Type 95 SSN will be the FIRST submarine in the world to have electric drive. You know that electric drive submarines will be very,very, very quiet now dont you?
China's sub tech is still unproven at large.... Russia fell behind US by a lot after societ collapse but by recent interviews of US navy officials they're impressed with the latest Russian subs which they say to be of equal class as theirs on so many levels.... with that said, Chinese subs still have to be proven its worth to be called as technically equal to or superior of US subs.
 
.

You dont give up do you?

They are talking about the Type 94, which is a SSBN from last decade and that can be considered "noisy".

I was talking about the later Type-093B SSN(3 launched last year) which is on par with the bulk of the current US fleet, and the all electric Type 95 SSN which should at least match the best the US has right now.
 
.
These aircraft do not need to be "reassigned" against BD lol.

They can be put into action against BD at a moment's notice.
Let's imagine hitler back from the dead and is now the PM of India looking for new world order....
If he starts with Bangladesh it will be a suicide.... just putting those aircrafts against us opens up the entire Chinese-Indian border.... and any conflict starting with China will drag Pakistan in. No such scenarios can be imagined by a well thinking man.... but off we're talking about self destructing hitler back from his death so yeah....... xD
 
.
China's sub tech is still unproven at large.... Russia fell behind US by a lot after societ collapse but by recent interviews of US navy officials they're impressed with the latest Russian subs which they say to be of equal class as theirs on so many levels.... with that said, Chinese subs still have to be proven its worth to be called as technically equal to or superior of US subs.

Check this thread out and make an assesment for yourself:

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/chin...t-electric-drive-on-a-military-submar.499844/

Bear in mind that the latest Chinese Type 93B is believed to be as quiet as the bulk of the current US fleet(Improved Los Angeles Class)
 
.
These aircraft do not need to be "reassigned" against BD lol.

They can be put into action against BD at a moment's notice.

I am talking about the overall role of the Airforce base, not the aircraft.
 
.
Check this thread out and make an assesment for yourself:

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/chin...t-electric-drive-on-a-military-submar.499844/

Bear in mind that the latest Chinese Type 93B is believed to be as quiet as the bulk of the current US fleet(Improved Los Angeles Class)
So you're gonna trust mainstream media talking about highly sensitive subject so openly to the mass public?

Ps you don't even have the performance figure of how quite they're under sonar compared to Los Angeles class..... this is purely speculation on your part as I'm sure such datas are highly classified.
 
.
China's sub tech is still unproven at large.... Russia fell behind US by a lot after societ collapse but by recent interviews of US navy officials they're impressed with the latest Russian subs which they say to be of equal class as theirs on so many levels.... with that said, Chinese subs still have to be proven its worth to be called as technically equal to or superior of US subs.

He's a good China shill. Let's give him that.
 
.
You dont give up do you?

They are talking about the Type 94, which is a SSBN from last decade and that can be considered "noisy".

I was talking about the later Type-093B SSN(3 launched last year) which is on par with the bulk of the current US fleet, and the all electric Type 95 SSN which should at least match the best the US has right now.
Do you even bother to read?

Some experts argue that the Type 093B is approaching the quality of the U.S. Los Angeles-class, but heavy classification makes assessing the full capabilities of both classes difficult.

Source: http://www.nti.org/analysis/articles/china-submarine-capabilities/

The "some experts argue" part does not translates into credibility, my friend.

What do you know about the noise levels of Type 93B submarines?

FYI: http://gentleseas.blogspot.com/2016/10/submarine-noise.html
 
.
So you're gonna trust mainstream media talking about highly sensitive subject so openly to the mass public?

Ps you don't even have the performance figure of how quite they're under sonar compared to Los Angeles class..... this is purely speculation on your part as I'm sure such datas are highly classified.

Ok. Believe as you wish as you are free to do so.

PS "All electric drive" is not a highly senstive subject. It is a new type of propulsion system and the Chinese have confirmed that they will be putting it into their new submarine. It would be a bit like the US revealing that their new fighter plane would be the first to use a new type of non-jet engine.
Like I have said before you are just a little kid who has little life experience and so cannot really debate properly yet.

Do you even bother to read?

Some experts argue that the Type 093B is approaching the quality of the U.S. Los Angeles-class, but heavy classification makes assessing the full capabilities of both classes difficult.

Source: http://www.nti.org/analysis/articles/china-submarine-capabilities/

The "some experts argue" part does not translates into credibility, my friend.

What do you know about the noise levels of Type 93B submarines?

FYI: http://gentleseas.blogspot.com/2016/10/submarine-noise.html

And what do YOU know about the capabilities of Improved Los Angeles versus Type 93B? Absolutely nothing.

Anyway have a good day as you would probably be the type that would have believed the nonsense written about the "inferior" zero on the eve of WW2 before it decimated allied fighters in the opening stages of WW2.
 
Last edited:
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom