#BombAssad trending updates. Strikes imminent

[LeGenD]

Yes, in their dreams. Cowards are fleeing Syria.

 

[Basel]

What Russia is deploying at sea??

https://twitter.com/x/status/984098691698094081

https://twitter.com/x/status/984098679027007489

https://twitter.com/x/status/984062578400866304

 

[F-22Raptor]

Most expect an attack from the Mediterranean, but the US could safely strike from the east in Iraqi airspace using B-1 bombers and JASSM-ER cruise missiles. B-1's carry 24 JASSMs with a 1,000km range. IMO, JASSMs are superior missiles to Tomahawks outside of range. There low observable airframe will make it extremely difficult to shoot down.

 

[Basel]

https://twitter.com/x/status/983946738074464256

 

[HannibalBarca]

What Russia is deploying at sea??

https://twitter.com/x/status/984098691698094081

https://twitter.com/x/status/984098679027007489

https://twitter.com/x/status/984062578400866304

Nothing... 11 ships already left Tartus port...
ASSad and Cie are packing as much as they can to RU airbase... that way, the US can't do much about it... Most of other "strategical points" are almost empty or under RU flag...

 

[Basel]

Most expect an attack from the Mediterranean, but the US could safely strike from the east in Iraqi airspace using B-1 bombers and JASSM-ER cruise missiles. B-1's carry 24 JASSMs with a 1,000km range. IMO, JASSMs are superior missiles to Tomahawks outside of range. There low observable airframe will make it extremely difficult to shoot down.

If Russia decided to engage with full force it will be bloody for both side.

 

[500]

https://twitter.com/x/status/984088578627129344

Russian navy fled from Syria.

 

[Army research]

https://twitter.com/x/status/984088578627129344

Russian navy fled from Syria.

Or they might have left port to be ready to intercept missiles in sea? Or they could have fled.
Please don't present speculation as fact ( I'm neutral in this conflict, don't pick any side )

 

[LeGenD]

If Russia decided to engage with full force it will be bloody for both side.

FYI: https://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/russia-s-involvement-in-syria-proves-that-its-far-behin-1794966734

 

[HannibalBarca]

Or they might have left port to be ready to intercept missiles in sea? Or they could have fled.
Please don't present speculation as fact ( I'm neutral in this conflict, don't pick any side )

They did left Tartus port... 11 of their ship... And there is no "News" of deployment in the Med sea as it's commonly done for every navy... the US did...France did etc...

So if it's not a military maneuver, it's either they going back to RU or changing port for another country...

 

[Army research]

They did left Tartus port... 11 of their ship... And there is no "News" of deployment in the Med sea as it's commonly done for every navy... the US did...France did etc...

So if it's not a military maneuver, it's either they going back to RU or changing port...

Sorry, my mistake then.
Kudos

 

[F-22Raptor]

If Russia decided to engage with full force it will be bloody for both side.

If Russia attacks US assets they'll no longer have a presence in Syria. You can count on that.

 

[LeGenD]

Russian forces stand no chance against American in a conventional engagement.

 

[500]

Or they might have left port to be ready to intercept missiles in sea? Or they could have fled.
Please don't present speculation as fact ( I'm neutral in this conflict, don't pick any side )

yes transport ships also went to intercept.

 

[HannibalBarca]

https://twitter.com/x/status/984107410871717888