Bibi's speech to the UN (video and text)

[Mosamania]

The government of KSA is not a fan of the Iranian regime but the population still favors the Iranian people more than their neighbors to the west by a long shot. That move by King Abdullah would be political suicide.

The population hate the government apparent inactivity regarding Iran. But true, Iran is far more tolerable than Israel but both rank very low in the popularity ratings not so far from each other.

 

[Solomon2]

I agree with that. Specially because Iran made it clear that she will retaliate by striking our oil facilities even if Israel carried out the attack alone. So either case we will get dragged to war. But than again, our government has always been reactionary and never takes initiatives. Why we still have diplomatic relations with them is beyond me.

Although Saudi society is very conservative, Saudi Arabia's kings can be very skilled at applying the Koran, hadiths, and history to supporting new and previously unimaginable innovations, ranging from television broadcasting to hosting U.S. troops on Saudi soil. However Number Six, King Abdullah, has a personal hang-up when it comes to relations with Zionists. Jews he will deal with but not avowed Zionists. Maybe if Israel promised its planes would be manned by anti-Zionist Jews, do you think that would make him feel better?

 

[/dev/null]

Wow! Look at the Saudis - Sh!t scared of Iranians despite having the best equipment (Of course not the manpower...)Iranians must acquire nuclear weapons now by hook or by crook - It's a do or die situation.Iran's territorial integrity is in danger from these savages (Arabs+Israelis)

 

[KingMamba]

lol what the **** are you talking about?
Iranian regime is despised in Saudi Arabia and entire GCC. In fact, the overwhelming majority believe our government is doing too little regarding Iran.

So you are saying that your population is willing to favor the Zionists over the Iranians??? Then you are fooling yourself and the inaction on the part of King Abdullah shows that he agrees with me. It really comes down to who do you guys despise more.

 

[KingMamba]

The population hate the government apparent inactivity regarding Iran. But true, Iran is far more tolerable than Israel but both rank very low in the popularity ratings not so far from each other.

Exactly, so how would the population of KSA react to the government of KSA allowing access to air fields in the Kingdom to Zionists??? Especially considering KSA has a backroom deal in place with Pakistan (allegedly) to procure nukes in case they need them anyway. Not to mention even if they didn't have a deal in place, Pakistan would not allow Iran to threaten the Kingdom and would at the very least provide an umbrella if they haven't already. Last but not least there is no evidence that Iran is even planning an attack on KSA to begin with considering that would isolate them from the rest of the Muslim world.

PS- One more thing, Mecca and Medina do not belong to KSA. They are the custodians to the holy lands as said by King Abdullah they have no sovereignty over them in reality, they belong to the Muslims worldwide. How would Muslims feel about King Abdullah allowing access to air fields near Islamic Holy Lands to the Zionists?? I am sure King Abdullah has thought about all this and more. Right now the Kingdom is looked on as leader by most Muslims worldwide (although personally I am not a fan) but things would change if the above scenario played out. I would like your thoughts on this.

 

[raptor22]

I've been speaking about the need to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons for over 15 years.

Mr prime minister where is that nuke ? till when you wanna continue it ? As I remember it's 100th times that you set a date for an Iranian nuke ? why it has never ever happened ? 15 years ? as I remember you've been repeating your claims at least for 24 years and it has never come in practice , why?

besides attacking Iran needs balls that they suffer from lack of it .

 

[Banu Umayyah]

Exactly, so how would the population of KSA react to the government of KSA allowing access to air fields in the Kingdom to Zionists??? Especially considering KSA has a backroom deal in place with Pakistan (allegedly) to procure nukes in case they need them anyway. Not to mention even if they didn't have a deal in place, Pakistan would not allow Iran to threaten the Kingdom and would at the very least provide an umbrella if they haven't already. Last but not least there is no evidence that Iran is even planning an attack on KSA to begin with considering that would isolate them from the rest of the Muslim world.

PS- One more thing, Mecca and Medina do not belong to KSA. They are the custodians to the holy lands as said by King Abdullah they have no sovereignty over them in reality, they belong to the Muslims worldwide. How would Muslims feel about King Abdullah allowing access to air fields near Islamic Holy Lands to the Zionists?? I am sure King Abdullah has thought about all this and more. Right now the Kingdom is looked on as leader by most Muslims worldwide (although personally I am not a fan) but things would change if the above scenario played out. I would like your thoughts on this.

Mecca and Medina are our personal property. Its a privilege we allow outsiders to visit not a right. Deal with it.

 

[BLACKEAGLE]

I agree with that. Specially because Iran made it clear that she will retaliate by striking our oil facilities even if Israel carried out the attack alone. So either case we will get dragged to war. But than again, our government has always been reactionary and never takes initiatives. Why we still have diplomatic relations with them is beyond me.

I did not expect this from you.

 

[BLACKEAGLE]

Both Iran and Israel are seen as threats. The deference between them two is that Israel is a clear threat and it acts so, while Iran isn't because it uses Islam and patriotic resonant slogans as a facade of it's real intentions in the region, the only people Iran has been long active against are Arabs by creating proxies and chaos in their countries. Iran was the only beneficiary of US invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, their rulers came over American tanks and took over the reigns, and what a coincidence! both are the closest allies of Iran.

 

[airmarshal]

Both Iran and Israel are seen as threats. The deference between them two is that Israel is a clear threat and it acts so, while Iran isn't because it uses Islam and patriotic resonant slogans as a facade of it's real intentions in the region, the only people Iran has been long active against are Arabs by creating proxies and chaos in their countries. Iran was the only beneficiary of US invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, their rulers came over American tanks and took over the reigns, and what a coincidence! both are the closest allies of Iran.

I think the appropriate thing to say is that the differences between the Muslims is letting the enemies in and create and play with our diffferences. Its natural to have differences but to use them to make enemies and to fight is currently the reason for downfall of Islamic countries. We have not able bridge that properly.

I respect Saudi Arabia for the holiest of Islamic shrines it has in its borders. I dont respect their government at all. If you read '7 pillars of wisdom' by T E Lawrence (aka Lawrence of Arabia), you will know I m saying this. They are traitors. They have always gone in league with the enemies of Islam to get the benefits that serve them.

 

[Takaavar]

Mecca and Medina are our personal property. Its a privilege we allow outsiders to visit not a right. Deal with it.

Muslims should free them from your dirty hands then.

 

[BLACKEAGLE]

I think the appropriate thing to say is that the differences between the Muslims is letting the enemies in and create and play with our diffferences. Its natural to have differences but to use them to make enemies and to fight is currently the reason for downfall of Islamic countries. We have not able bridge that properly.

I respect Saudi Arabia for the holiest of Islamic shrines it has in its borders. I dont respect their government at all. If you read '7 pillars of wisdom' by T E Lawrence (aka Lawrence of Arabia), you will know I m saying this. They are traitors. They have always gone in league with the enemies of Islam to get the benefits that serve them.

Believe me, the last thing they would think about is your guys respect. It's unfortunate that you keep parroting Iranian typical slogans of Saudis enmity to Islam, of course they mean their version of Islam. Iran is among those enemies you are talking about.

 

[Banu Umayyah]

Muslims should free them from your dirty hands then.

You know where they are. Come and get them.

 

[Armstrong]

Mecca and Medina are our personal property. Its a privilege we allow outsiders to visit not a right. Deal with it.

Try & stop us, brother !

And yeah Pakistan Zindabad, Iran Zindabad & KSA Zindabad !

 

[Banu Umayyah]

Although Saudi society is very conservative, Saudi Arabia's kings can be very skilled at applying the Koran, hadiths, and history to supporting new and previously unimaginable innovations, ranging from television broadcasting to hosting U.S. troops on Saudi soil. However Number Six, King Abdullah, has a personal hang-up when it comes to relations with Zionists. Jews he will deal with but not avowed Zionists. Maybe if Israel promised its planes would be manned by anti-Zionist Jews, do you think that would make him feel better?

I really doubt that our government will take this zionist factor into consideration if they made up the decision to allow Israeli fighters. I also doubt that the government even cares about that and king Abdullah's decision are made 95% by his advisors. Not surprising for a 85 year old semi-illiterate man.
The most likely reason is US objection IMO. I can't imagine us orchestrating something like this with Israel behind the US, specially since we have no diplomatic relations. Qatar would be a much more likely host, since the previously had diplomatic relations with Israel before the Gaza war. But all of this is very unlikely, since any attack would almost necessarily involve the US which renderes this collaboration unnecessary.