I have hardly disagreed with him on Sensitive issuesNot really , thing is most of these people who talk big about secularism in pdf don't believe it themselves considering how much they claim that we are evil Hindutvadi Modi Bhakts . Either that or they choose to remain as ignorant as a drunken monkey
Though i disagree that @seiko is not a sickular he is a secular in actual thinking from what conversations i had with him
I have hardly disagreed with him on Sensitive issues
. In fact me and @seiko agree with each other on several other points . Which may mean you have absolutely no clue on what supposed communal evil Hindus really want and you oppose just for the sake of keeping your secular tag 
If Narendra Modi joins PDF tomorrow and he stands by the principles he use to follow in his speeches, it won't take seconds before he will be declared as a pseudo secular or leftist as per pdf and ultra nationalist version of secularism. No wonder he might become a TTA too as per @arp2041
PDF Has some Really Good Thinkers. This is My Effort to pull the Most Electrifying and Unique Posts.
This is a Beautiful Post. Hats Off, to the Man "@SarthakGanguly" Who Wrote This :
View attachment 99130
That unfortunately is the bottomline for the separatists and their fanboys.
Oh btw - do you know Mirwaiz was pelted with stones when he tried giving a speech on Army's mishandling?
Pakistanis often claim Kashmir as the unfinished business of Partition. That's the communal State policy ( since partition was itself was communal!)
But it was unfair that in 1947, only Muslims were asked if they wished to separate. The Hindus were not consulted if they wanted to stay united or not! If a referendum is done, let's do one for all of India and Pakistan as well by the same logic? It's not too far-fetched. East West Germany, North South Yemen etc did get united. Why not do a referendum and get over with it?
If not, then at least let all Indians (who have invested money, shed blood and cried and labored over Kashmir) also have a vote? They certainly have done more for Kashmir than Geelani and his cohorts.
On the other hand, if Muslim majority is the only logic (as it is) then why not hold a referendum in Western UP, North Kerala, parts of West Bengal, Southern Assam, Hyderabad, etc? Why should they be discriminated? They are also as Muslim as a Dar or a Butt(converted from Dhar and Bhatt) of Kashmir. They should also be given the choice of not only joining Pakistan but carry the land along as well!
The whole idea is hilarious, to say the least.
Source : Should Kashmir get a chance to decide their future through Referendum?
View attachment 99107
no sir it dosent works like that specialli after shimla agreement and pakistans new found status vice versa in todays world but you can choose to live in denial at your own peril
No. It does not mean so. The fundamental problem of this whole argument is that you are assuming yourself on the extremist end which perhaps, you are not and neither I, have personally ever considered you to be. The people whom I consider utter bigot and totally illiterate about Indian History do not share your opinion about Seiko or any other people whom you might consider true secular as per this forum standard. You can revisit the threads where the true secular lot has been literally cursed and abused with the lowest standard by people who are communal and evil in all sense. So, please. Do not put yourself down that lot. I have not seen you degraded to that level.Difference is, he tries to understand others point of view and just simply doesn't brand others as "Communal hindutavdi Modi Bhakts etc... etc... " Its funny how liberals are liberal until you disagree with them
Lol..
