What's new

Bangladesh votes for UNGA resolution criticising Russia, demanding aid for Ukraine

Black_cats

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Dec 31, 2010
Messages
10,031
Reaction score
-5
Published on 01:48 AM, March 25, 2022

Bangladesh votes for UNGA resolution criticising Russia, demanding aid for Ukraine​


lryzw74nznot7f27xm3klnr47a.jpg

Voting results are seen on the screen during a special session of the U.N. General Assembly on Russia's invasion of Ukraine, at the United Nations headquarters in New York City, New York, U.S., March 24, 2022. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

Star Digital Report

Bangladesh is one of the 140 countries that voted for a UN General Assembly resolution demanding aid access and civilian protection in Ukraine on Thursday, and criticized Russia for creating a "dire" humanitarian situation after Moscow invaded its neighbor one month ago.

It is the second time the 193-member General Assembly has overwhelmingly isolated Russia over what Moscow calls a "special military operation" that it says aims to destroy Ukraine's military infrastructure, reports Reuters.

"We voted on the grounds of the humanitarian situation," an official of Bangladesh Permanent Representative to the UN in New York told The Daily Star.

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has blasted Russia's "absurd war." Thousands of people have been killed in Ukraine, millions made refugees, and cities pulverized in the past month.

The resolution adopted on Thursday, which was drafted by Ukraine and allies, received 140 votes in favor and five votes against - Russia, Syria, North Korean, Eritrea and Belarus - while 38 countries, including China and India abstained.

General Assembly resolutions are non binding, but they carry political weight. There was a round of applause in the hall after the adoption on Thursday.

Russia's UN Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia described the resolution adopted on Thursday as a "pseudo humanitarian draft" that took a "one-sided view of the situation." He again accused Western countries of a campaign of "unprecedented pressure" to win votes, a claim that the United States has rejected.

Ukraine and its allies had been looking to match or improve on support received for a March 2 General Assembly resolution that deplored Russia's "aggression" and demanded it withdraw its troops. That received 141 yes votes, the same five no votes, while 35 states - including China - abstained.

'ASTOUNDING SUCCESS'

US Ambassador to the United Nations Linda Thomas-Greenfield described the vote on Thursday as an "astounding success," telling reporters: "There's really no difference between 141 and 140."

The resolution demands the protection of civilians, medical personnel, aid workers, journalists, hospitals and other civilian infrastructure. It also demands an end to the siege of cities, in particular Mariupol.

Ukraine and Western allies have accused Moscow of attacking civilians indiscriminately. Moscow denies attacking civilians.

The resolution echoes the March 2 General Assembly text by again demanding that Moscow stop fighting and withdraw its troops from Ukraine.

South Africa had proposed a rival draft resolution that focused on the humanitarian situation and did not mention Russia. Russia appealed for countries to support that text.

The General Assembly decided not to act on the South African draft after Ukraine called a vote under a rule covering draft resolutions on the same issue.

The General Assembly vote came one day after a Russian-drafted resolution calling for aid access and civilian protection in Ukraine - and not mentioning Moscow's role - failed at the UN Security Council, with only Russia and China voting yes and the remaining 13 members abstaining.

The Russian Security Council draft was very similar to the text put forward in the General Assembly by South Africa.

 
. . .
Just eye-wash, the first resolution condemning the Russian actions was the one that showed where countries stand on the so called "Special operation" and Bangladesh aptly abstained.

This resolution is meaningless (They all are anyway).
 
. . .
Just eye-wash, the first resolution condemning the Russian actions was the one that showed where countries stand on the so called "Special operation" and Bangladesh aptly abstained.

This resolution is meaningless (They all are anyway).
Still, we should have stayed neutral on this one too just like the first one. We don't need to get in between power plays of other countries.

Nuland must have offered something juicy or threatened SHW to remove her from power to change position.
 
.
Without Russia (USSR) diplomatic aid at UN, Bangladesh probably wouldn't exist
 
.
"Bangladesh is one of the 140 countries that voted for a UN General Assembly resolution demanding aid access and civilian protection in Ukraine on Thursday, and criticized Russia for creating a "dire" humanitarian situation after Moscow invaded its neighbor one month ago".

The paragraph above is the gist of the resolution. It is more about civilian protection and humanitarian situation.

So, BD was right to vote for it.
 
. . . .
All I have to say is the age of Dajjal seems to be here.

This world is crazy shady.


I think if the world can survive this decade without a full blown nuclear war between USA/Russia and China, we should hopefully get to a better place as China as a balancing superpower will calm things down.

US primacy has caused far too much instability, death and destruction over the last 3 decades.

China for all their faults will probably follow a less intrusive and aggressive attitude around the world far away from their own region.
 
.
I think if the world can survive this decade without a full blown nuclear war between USA/Russia and China, we should hopefully get to a better place as China as a balancing superpower will calm things down.

US primacy has caused far too much instability, death and destruction over the last 3 decades.

China for all their faults will probably follow a less intrusive and aggressive attitude around the world far away from their own region.

I wish we all could discuss these things over tea instead of having to type out our thoughts.

At least for me, it limits what I have to say because I'm too lazy to type it out.

In any case, we are all witnessing history in the making.

Like crazy shifts.

Hopefully, things stabilize and cooler heads prevail.

Ukraine is not worth WW3.

And Zelensky is annoying.
 
.
I wish we all could discuss these things over tea instead of having to type out our thoughts.

At least for me, it limits what I have to say because I'm too lazy to type it out.

In any case, we are all witnessing history in the making.

Like crazy shifts.

Hopefully, things stabilize and cooler heads prevail.

Ukraine is not worth WW3.

And Zelensky is annoying.



The Russian position was actually quite reasonable if you think about it.

1. Ukraine never joins Nato.

2. Crimea,that was always part of Russia till Khruschev without consulting the Russian people decides to hand it to Ukraine in 1954, goes to Russia. Also the two separatist areas in the East that are ethnic Russian get autonomy.

I do not agree with the war that Putin has launched against Ukraine but from their position what was happening in Ukraine was an existential threat to the Russian state.

Zelensky for all his bravery is failing his people. He should have been less confrontational and more willing to take Russian security considerations on board.
Even now, he can make a reasonable peace and save his people from more death and destruction.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom