What's new

Bangladesh to observe one-minute blackout on March 25

Yeah...we gucci. Myanmar is Myanmar...tries to provoke BD, but we are mature enough to let it slide. And the sea is good. Having sea access is a blessing. So yeah... We gucci
Haha coward enough to never confront,that Junta.
Untill Sea doesn't tries to take you in.
 
Actually most of prime Minister of pakistan (from 1947 to 1971 )was from East pakistan aka bangladesh.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Prime_Ministers_of_Pakistan

i agree with this.

And also about the military regime , most of military personnel were pathans not Punjabi.
It's our favorite and popular mistake that we love to believe that we were under panjabi rule.

Not this. Punjabis were always majority in Pak army. General Ayub was Hindko commonly known as Hazara or Hazar'wal (not the mongolian Hazara living in Balochistan) they look Pashtun from KPK. Hindko language is dialect of Punjabi.

Here the seller is speaking in Hindko. you cant even differentiate whether its Punjabi or Hindko. lol.


Pakistanis proud of rape. Also proud of hiding Bin Laden. And all the terrorism generates through Pakistan.

No worry. With Murikan drone strike compensation money every thing will be taken care of.

Not exactly we are not proud on rape products, especially when they are rude like you..:rofl:

Yes, we are proud that we dealt with threat of soviets with help of mujahideen, even Uncle sam was proud when it nurture Osama during soviet war.. but its game of big guys... who are you pole vulture bengali scum? your place is beneath balls of bharati hindus. go suck em.

They drone us bcoz we are flirting with their harem girl called Afghanistan and have killed their 5000 illegal sons and cause them trillion worth of damage to their treasure and fail their Afghan project..

BTW be aware, bharat is getting drones too from uncle sam :lol:
 
Last edited:
CPEC cannot make anyone but a small state of a few million people rich. You forget that Pakistan has an enormous population of 200 million that is growing at 2% a year. It needs major political and economic reform in order to grow GDP/capita at least 5-6% a year(it is currently at just over 3% with BD at 6%), and it has never grown at these rates sustained in it's whole 7 decades of independence. CPEC will certainly help the Pakistan economy for sure but it is not a magic wand to transform Pakistan into another Japan.
Pakistan has has 2 decades of subsidies from BD in the 1950s and 1960s with fiscal transfers, and one decade of it in the 1980s with US for Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, and yet BD has just surpassed them in GDP/capita. I am discounting the last decade and a half as what it got from the US, it lost in terrorism etc.
Yet, 3m BD folks work as domestic helps in Karachi.....
 
Not this. Punjabis were always majority in Pak army. General Ayub was Hindko commonly known as Hazara or Hazar'wal (not the mongolian Hazara living in Balochistan) they look Pashtun from KPK. Hindko language is dialect of Punjabi.
Ok thanks brother for this information.

@django @Valar. @Nilgiri @Skull and Bones @American Pakistani @Janbaz Rao

30 years of Pakistani rule and they still have learned how to pronounce Z!!! I’m having a great laugh here!!

@Avicenna plz tell me you can pronounce Z...


'j' and 'z' don't have different pronunciation in Bengali. But if z is a strict rule in Urdu , then I must write z.

However @Śakra , so from 1947 to 1971 total 30 years? You are a genius.

@Śakra

let's tag them back .

@django @Valar. @Nilgiri @Skull and Bones i@American Pakistani @Janbaz Rao
@Avicenna
:) Guys please tell me how do you calculate the time. Between 1947 to 1971 ?
 
Last edited:
Same thing.
BD does not take orders from foreigners.
Yes, I find it very hilarious that Punjabi-pathan elite thought they can boss around Bengali people any period of time without any consequences. They don't know rebelliousness to foreign rules and injustice is in the gene of Bengali people.In the middle ages, when Bengal was under Delhi sultanate, this region was experienced so much rebellion, that the Delhi sultans called it 'Bulghaqpur' or House of strife. If we look at who ruled Bengal in the last 1000 years before the British than we can see that Bengal was independent for overwhelming majority of times.

Independent Pala empire from 750-1070 AD=320 years
Independent Sena dynasty from 1070- 1230 AD=160 years
Under Delhi sultanate from 1230-1338 AD=108 years
Independent Bengal sultanate from 1338-1576 AD= 238 years
Under Mughal rules from 1576- 1717 AD= 141 years.
Independent Bengal Nawabi from 1717-1757 AD=40 years.

So out of 1007 years of history, Bengal was under Delhi's rule for mere 249 years.Emperor Akber needed 30 years long campaign to finally subdue the Bengal and incorporate it to the Mughal empire.Bengal was also the first region to rebel against the British rules and anti British agitation was strongest in this region. And west Pakistani military junta deluded themselves that they can boss around Bengalis and can continue their exploitative rules without any consequences.:lol::lol:
 
Last edited:
^ +1, you don't mess around with the descendants of the mighty Ballal Sen and Lakshman Sen. Pakjabis learnt it the hard way!
 
Yes, I find it very hilarious that Punjabi-pathan elite thought that they can boss around Bengali people any period of time without any consequences. They don't know rebelliousness to foreign rules and injustice in the gene of Bengali people.In the middle ages, when Bengal was under Delhi sultanate, this region was experienced so much rebellion, that the Delhi sultans called it 'Bulghaqpur' or House of strife. If we look at who ruled Bengal in the last 1000 years before the British than we can see that Bengal was independent for overwhelming majority of times.

Independent Pala empire from 750-1070 AD=320 years
Independent Sena dynasty from 1070- 1230 AD=160 years
Under Delhi sultanate from 1230-1338 AD=108 years
Independent Bengal sultanate from 1338-1576 AD= 238 years
Under Mughal rules from 1576- 1717 AD= 141 years.
Independent Bengal Nawabi from 1717-1757 AD=40 years.

So out of 1007 years of history, Bengal was under Delhi's rule for mere 249 years.Emperor Akber needed 30 years long campaign to finally subdue the Bengal and incorporate it to the Mughal empire.Bengal was also the first region to rebel against the British rules and anti British agitation was most strong in this region. And west Pakistani military junta thought they can boss around Bengalis and can continue their exploitative rules without any consequences.:lol::lol:


You did not add another part, Bengal was the richest region of India. These poor Punjabis and Pathans were no match to the wealth that this region had at that time. However now Bangladesh has overtaken Pakistan in terms of per capita GDP (nominal), export earning (almost double), literacy rate, HDI and in most of the indicators. It is appearing Pakistanis of PDF prefer to live in their la la land!!!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bengal_Subah#cite_note-star-4

Bengal was the Mughal Empire's wealthiest province.[3] It generated 50% of the empire's GDP and 12% of the world's GDP,[4] globally dominant in industries such as textile manufacturing and shipbuilding,[5][6][7] with the capital Dhaka having a population exceeding a million people.[4] It was an exporter of silk and cotton textiles, steel, saltpeter, and agricultural and industrial produce.

After British colonialism Kingdom of Mysore under Hyder Ali and Tipu Sultan became the richest province of India by overtaking Bengal Subah.
 
^ +1, you don't mess around with the descendants of the mighty Ballal Sen and Lakshman Sen. Pakjabis learnt it the hard way!
First of all those sens are from south india. 2nd, entire kingdom fell in front of 18 warrior. No wonder you west bengalis are the descendant of sens.
 
What are you smoking dude? Pakistan achieved 5.5% growth last year and will achieve 6% this year.




its clear no, now stop begging for apology.. you can go fck yourself along with shupppa pooowaaa.

What is GDP capita growth for Pakistan last fiscal?
GDP growth comparison is useless as Pakistan has higher population growth.
 
Edit - As for corruption according to transparency international:

1. BD is at 143/180
2. Pakistan is at 117/180
3. India is at 81/180

For comparison Turkey is at 81/180
There are not much difference between 143 and 117. Both are highly corrupt. But corruption is not a big impediment of economic progress. China, Vietnam and some other African countries are also very corrupt, but they are developing at breath neck speed.
 
They aren't.

No one is wasting anything on them. Pakistanis bring 1971 back more then we do. Last time Hasina talked about Pakistan was like 7-8 months ago. While in this year Pakistani ex Nawaz talked about 1971 and like a month ago thgeir foreign minister brought 1971 again and the war crime trial while claiming BD was sabotaging SAARC.

Past has to be remembered. It is there to take valuable lessons from.


Well, he is from Jamaati Master race. Almost on equal footings with Pakistanis. He is nothing like average Bangladeshis like us.

Lol. When did we bring up the issues of 1971 ? Nawaz might have talked about 2-3 words of BD and you guys are going gaga on it. It is no secret that how Your whole country and PM is obsessed about 1971 and she talked about 1971 few days back as well in some speech . You just Collect Nawaz all speeches till today and compare it with your PM speeches and then see who talked more about 1971?
 
@Homo Sapiens

Doyalbhai

I find it very hilarious that Punjabi-pathan elite thought they can boss around Bengali people any period of time without any consequences.

With due respects, sir, and in spite of being a (Hindu) Bengali myself, I am willing to see how why the Punjabis and Pathanis have such a high opinion of themselves vis-a-vis Bongs. After all, they ruled us for several decade, is not centuries, not the other way round.

Regards
 
However Punjabis are very partial to their own kind, on preferences of jobs, opportunities and education. This is essentially what caused a lot of discontent in East Pakistan before 1971. I hate to generalize, but most writers (even large numbers of independent thinkers in Bangladesh) wrote about this as the cause. This was not dealt with well by the Pakistani administration at all, hence hastening the split, which was undesirable by all concerned.
The crux of the problem was, Punjabi hold the gun in independent Pakistan due to British legacy. Which created problem.If Bengali hold the gun then we could have set up the capital in Dhaka and all the elite would have migrated to Dhaka. With army and capital in our side we could have eaten most of the pie and dominate the western wing.This is exactly the thing happened in united Pakistan. Only a highly democratic and inclusive rule could have avoided the events in 1971. But you know, Paksatani are hot headed and love to solve the problem by brute force rather than intelligence and pragmatism. There are many jokes about Pathan intelligence. I think these jokes also apply other ethnicity in Pak as well.
 
Back
Top Bottom