bd_4_ever
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2009
- Messages
- 2,458
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Reply to the underlined portions:
1. Yah, I was little biased.
2. It’s true that BA will do the main battle and we know that. But I said that because: it seems to me that our neighbors will not ever attack us vigorously, but they will always try to capture our little areas whenever they will get any chance and kill 2 or 5 people in every week and in those cases there is no role for BA but for BDR. So what are the solutions for those frequent little offences by BSF?
3. And I heard that BSF often makes bunkers in the opposite side and their monitoring towers are in higher altitude (like in Sylhet) than ours, that's why I said about UAV just for monitor sometimes if necessary.
4. Come on! Days are changing, so if it's necessary and time requires then we shall familiarized and become experienced with other new technologies again if we believe that we are dynamic. Today Burma is using MIG and who knows tomorrow they will use MIG. If they will procure new jets then in future ultimately we will also have to procure and adapt new technologies.
*I want well relationship with Burma for the future betterment of Bangladesh.
I will reply according to your points:-
1. Appreciated that you agreed.
2. You mentioned about countries not attacking us by tanks and planes but by taking away our lands. Dude, your conception (as u highlighted "it seems to you") that no other country will attack us by force needs to be corrected. When you have neighbours like an isolated Burma, ruled by millitary....i would be bound to think twice before saying that. Yes, our people around the border are being killed and you know whose fault it is apart from the BSFs? Our political leaders, policy makers and some creepy heads of forces.
You asked for the solutions....well improvement of BDR with new guns, SMGs, LAVs will not give you a penny benefit if "THEY ARE NOT USED". Given the current situation, BDR must first be given the authority to shoot at sight if any mishaps occur. They should use that Ak-47 or whatever they have in their hand to deal with that first, then comes the matter of their improvement. Off course you wont want the new equipments to stay in the inventory for ever.
3. There are other ways to solve the problem of monitoring, if that is what you are concerned with. We can also build higher outposts and build bunkers on our side, and economically speaking you can afford like 50-60 more of them with the money of a single UAV, just for the sake of monitoring. Moreover, a force where a mutiny has taken place, i dont think policy makers will agree to provide them with those high-tech equipments, let alone a UAV.
4. I am sure our decision makers have that in mind. For the time being we need to increase our numbers and so i believe MIG is ok, given that we get a different variant like SMT. It is probably to deal with current shortage and uncertainties and i think, we may have a long term plan as well. Hasina is unpredictable you know, i wont be suprised if she get 4 B-2 bombers during the last year of her present term.
*Well, i may sound odd but Bangladesh is far better off even with the absence of any relation with Burma.
Cheers!!!