Well its a heck of a long post. I cant just go and split them as the window here is too small.
Few points. You dont have to go personal if you cant find a counter logic. He stand by his own view so do you. His role in 1971 was never questioned. So far I know him his view points are as such.
1) We should be equally proud of 1971 and 1947 and they are not mutually exclusive.
2) It was progressive politics in the years of 1960's on the street of Dhaka so did it in Park street in Calcutta before 1947. Mujib was also an actor to it.
3) Ideologically Bangladesh cease to exist if you leave aside 1947.
So his approach was balanced.
Regarding the Namasudra part, even some Muslim fall for it. We discussed it over and over again. It was buddhist who were made Nama Sudra (correct phrase would be lower caste) by the Sena Dynasty which resulted in wholesale conversion to Islam later on. It was all along a Buddhist Land and never been a Hindu land and later turned to Muslim land.
Long post it is because it analysed three long video recording appended.
One would not have gone personal unless the man himself got personal. And, since you did not wish to see or admit, I countered each of his statement.
I just analysed what he said and what I thought was just ranting of imagined slights.
Also, I find it most uncharitable of anyone to quote those who are dead and cannot defend themselves. If the man had morality, he would have said everything that he wanted when these people were alive and could defend themselves.
It is only the vainglorious, who want to appear wearing a halo over their heads with big talk when safe in the thought that what he is saying cannot be refuted since all those mentioned are Dead!!
On the issue of Liberation, he did mention that since he was not a part of the Liberation, he was handicapped! That should be an indication as to which side of the bread was buttered for him!
He shows how he ticked off all national leaders, be they Indian or Bangaldeshi. He claims he categorically disagreed with the Bangladeshi Govt views. Well, he should have resigned if he felt so strongly as he is trying to portray now. He did not resign. And now, what is the idea of projecting himself as a great hero? Such people are no heroes who cannot stand up to their conviction and only speak when all are Dead who could refute him.
Nama sudra is worse than sudra and it is silly to bring in this aspect. And that too stating that someone said that Bangaldeshis are Nama Sudras etc when the poor man is dead and cannot refute it. No sane person will claim that all Bangaldeshi are Nama Sudras and that too an educated person.
Imagine to what low level this man has stooped to.
He has condemned this dead man on a video which will be watched by many other Bangladeshi and now even us here!!
Is that a correct thing to do?
He has spread hate for this dead man and his family will be ostracised for this very unfair remark - a remark he may have never made, but this Speaker slipped it in to be a hero for the moment and stooped so low as to use him to prove a point.
Eastwest and Integra by thanking you may find such a despicable and condemnable thought very honourable to condemn the dead who cannot defend themselves, but then I do not share that view.
In fact, I find this man an incorrigible wretch of humanity.
A scum with scum like thought.
