Two platforms is a difficult task for even the best air forces. But you propose 3 different platforms that will need airmen trained for maintenance of three different suppliers not to mention the cost associated with spares not just based on numbers but the different varieties as well. This approach is nothing short of Indonesia’s incompetence at maintaining a decent submarine force, all they bought were at some point cannibalized... or if we’re sticking with air forces, india... less than 70% of flanker platform is operational at any given time and heir mix of Jaguars, mirages and migs are nightmare for them...
Many small air forces operate three different platforms. It is not that difficult to manage maintenance regimen for three different platforms. Even BAF has past experience in maintaining three different fighter platforms.
India's maintenance struggles are unique in that it is a poor country with a massive air force managed by incompetent people. Also unreliability of Russian equipment and Russians as suppliers also plays a huge part in India's struggles. BAF's need of 6-10 squadrons is minuscule in comparision.
By the time BAF would transition to three new platforms, MiG-29s and F-7s will be out of the picture.
what bd needs is as cost effective aircraft that meets capabilities for latest operational scenarios.
bangladesh can’t afford to lose an eft (accident or otherwise) Bangladesh certainly won’t bat an eye if they lost a f7 BGI tomorrow...
BAF needs at least a couple of squadrons of high performance (manoeuvrability + range + payload) air superiority fighters to strike deep into enemy territory and counter Su-30 and MiG-29 variants. Numbers alone cannot fulfill this particular role.
Such fighters will be costly to operate no matter where you get them from. EFT would at least be reliable.
in that regards as air chief talked about credible deterrence, my approach will be to stick with one platform for the foreseeable future, platform may be single engined, what matters us numbers.
You cannot achieve "credible deterrence" when you keep yourself exposed for being hamstrung by the supplier (West against India and China against Burma)
We do need single engine fighters both in numbers and with redundancy.
If we are forced to stick to only two platforms, I'd forget EFTs and get J-10s and Gripens in numbers with as much ToT as possible for both.
BAF should forget whatever vanity project on building trainers they are up to and instead collaborate with SAAB to prepare BAC, the aviation university and BAF to operate, maintain, overhaul and eventually assemble and manufacture (spares at least) Gripens.
I would sign a contract for 3 squadrons of j10c with an optional contract for 4 more. 3x16=48 j10c within 2-3 years isn’t impossible to achieve and gives our airforce the breathing room it needs. A further 64 aircraft purchase ensures airforce can maintain effective deterrence and control over the airspace. Fancy fighters can always come at a later stage when the economy is bigger.
Agreed. The above is a no brainer. I cannot find any justification as to why BAF has not ordered J-10s yet.
But here’s what’s actually going to happen
BAF will get a white elephant 16 EFT or whatever platform that doesnt provide adequate strength and then stick with it for the next 30 years
Agreed again. I fear this is exactly what is going to happen.